Section 80G of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.133

Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 133 (Deduction in respect of donations to certain funds, charitable institutions, etc) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 133 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 80G is Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT (101 ITR 234), cited in 323 of the 6,482 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 80G

Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT
101 ITR 234 · 1975 · Supreme Court
323
citing judgments

This case defines 'education' under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act as systematic instruction, schooling, or training given to the young for preparation for the work of life. It clarifies that 'education' in this context has a narrow meaning, not extending to every acquisition of further knowledge.

CIT v. Nirav Modi
390 ITR 292 · 2017 · High Court
286
citing judgments

The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) cannot invoke revisionary powers under Section 263 merely on the ground of "inadequate enquiry" by the Assessing Officer (AO) if the AO has conducted an enquiry, examined evidence, and formed a possible view. For Section 263 to apply, the PCIT must demonstrate that the assessment order is both erroneous (contrary to law) and prejudicial to the revenue.

Vedabhai v. Santaram
253 ITR 798 · 2002 · Supreme Court
262
citing judgments

When substantial justice and technical considerations are in conflict, substantial justice should be prioritized. Condoning delay requires a cautious approach without malafide or dilatory tactics, and 'sufficient cause' should be interpreted liberally to advance substantial justice.

India Trade Promotion Organization v. DGIT(Exemption)
371 ITR 333 · 2015 · High Court
128
citing judgments

An institution engaged in the advancement of general public utility retains its charitable character and eligibility for exemptions under Section 11 or approval under Section 10(23C)(iv) provided profit is not its predominant motive, even if it generates incidental surpluses or collects fees.

Ananda Social and Educational Trust v. CIT
426 ITR 340 · 2020 · Supreme Court
116
citing judgments

For registration under Section 12AA, the Commissioner (Exemptions) must examine the objects of the trust and the genuineness of its proposed activities, even if the trust has not yet commenced actual charitable activities or incurred expenditure.

CIT v. ITC Ltd.
236 Taxmann 612 · 2016 · High Court
108
citing judgments

When computing deduction under Section 80IA, specifically for inter-unit transfer of power, the benefit cannot be claimed based on rates chargeable by distribution licensees to consumers. The deduction must be computed based on the rate fixed by the Tariff Regulation Commission for sale by electricity generating companies.

Dhanuka & Sons. v. CIT
339 ITR 319 · 2011 · High Court
100
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A for expenditure incurred to earn exempt dividend income (under Section 10(34)) is permissible. The assessee bears the burden to show the source of funds for acquiring shares, regardless of whether those shares are old or recently acquired.

Velu Palandar v. DCIT
83 ITR 683 · 1972 · High Court
94
citing judgments

The opportunity of hearing provided to an assessee must be real, effective, and realistic, not merely notional, and tax authorities are incumbent to decide cases on their merits after affording due opportunity.

CIT v. Fine Jewellery (India) Ltd.
372 ITR 303 · 2015 · High Court
93
citing judgments

An assessment order is not erroneous and prejudicial to the revenue merely because it does not explicitly discuss an issue for which the Assessing Officer had raised queries and the assessee had provided a response. In such a scenario, the Principal Commissioner cannot invoke revisionary powers under Section 263.

JMS Mining (P.) Ltd. v. PCIT
130 Taxmann.com 118 · 2021 · ITAT
93
citing judgments

Donations made as part of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) expenditure are eligible for deduction under Section 80G if all conditions of Section 80G are satisfied. Such expenses are not automatically disallowed merely because they are CSR expenditure, in the absence of specific amendments to Section 80G similar to those in Section 37(1).

Judgments on Section 80G

Ahir Samaj Trust, Porbandar vs. CIT(Exemption), Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes in above terms

ITA 49/RJT/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot23 Jul 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं /.Ita No.49/Rjt/2025 िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: N.A. बनाम Ahir Samaj Trust Principal Commissioner Of Income- At Bhoddar, Dist. Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad /Vs. Porbandar-360 570 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaita 1524 D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) िनधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By. : Shri Mehul Ranpura, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-Dr सुनवाई क" तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 09/07/2025 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 23/07/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per, Dr. Arjun Lal Saini: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad, [In Short “Ld.Cit(E)”] Wherein Ld. Cit(E) Denied The Approval Of The Assessee U/S. 80G(5)(Ii) Of The Act & Rejected The Assessee’S Application In Form 10Ab For Approval U/S. 80G(5)(Iii) Of The Act, Holding That Assessee Trust Has Violated The Main Condition Of Sub-Section 5 Of Section 80G Of The Act, As The Assessee- Trust Is Not A Purely Charitable Trust.

For Respondent: Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr-DR
Section 5Section 5BSection 80(5)(iii)Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(ii)Section 80G(5)(iii)

Bai Pirojbai Manekji Patel Singaporewalla English School for Girls, Surat vs. The CIT (Exemption), Ahmedabad

ITA 487/SRT/2025[NA]Status: DisposedITAT Surat23 Jul 2025

Bench: Shri Tr Senthil Kumar & Shri Bijayananda Prusethआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.487/Srt/2025 (Hybrid Hearing) Bai Pirojbai Manekji Patel Singaporewalla English School For Girls, Gr. Floor, Parsi Panchayat Office, Shahpore, Surat-395 003 बनाम / Vs. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad, Room No.609, Floor-6, Aayakar Bhavan, Vejalpur, Nr. Sachin Tower, 100 Foot Road, Ahmedabad-380 015 -394 601 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aaatl 1130 C (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.488/Srt/2025 The Sorabji Burjorji Dastur Darab Paahalana Trust Fund, Ground Floor, Parsi Panchayat Office, Shahpore, Surat-395 003 बनाम / Vs. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad, Room No.609, Floor-6, Aayakar Bhavan, Vejalpur, Nr. Sachin Tower, 100 Foot Road, Ahmedabad-380 015 -394 601 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aaatt 2648 B (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.489/Srt/2025 First Dastur Maherji Rana Trust Fund Ground Floor, Parsi Panchayat Office, Shahpore, Surat-395 003 बनाम / Vs. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Exemption), Ahmedabad, Room No.609, Floor-6, Aayakar Bhavan, Vejalpur, Nr. Sachin Tower, 100 Foot Road, Ahmedabad-380 015 -394 601 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No: Aaatt 2651 A (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent)

Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)