Section 80C of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.123

Section 80C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 123 (Deduction for life insurance premia, deferred annuity, contributions to provident fund, etc) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 123 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 80C is Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. Delco India Pvt. Ltd. (67 Taxmann.com 357), cited in 42 of the 658 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 80C

Judgments on Section 80C

Harindar Prasad, Ballia vs. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 169/VNS/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Varanasi31 Aug 2026AY 2017-2018

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2017-18 Harinder Prasad, Vs. Nfac, Delhi Kharicha Garwar Near Primary School, Ballia 277121, U.P. Pan: Btypp1376E (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. Arvind Shukla, Adv Revenue By: Sh. Sudipta Paul, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 07.08.2026 Date Of Pronouncement: 31.08.2026 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, Am: This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Ld. Cit(A), Nfac Dated 26.03.2025, Wherein The Ld. Cit(A) Has Dismissed The Appeal Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Assessing Officer Passed Under Section 147 R.W.S. 143(3) R.W.S. 144B For The A.Y. 2017-18 Dated 26.03.2022. The Grounds Of Appeal Are As Under: - “1. Because The Learned Cit(A) Has Erred In Law As Well As On Facts In Dismissing The Appeal Simply On The Point Of Imitation Without Addressing The Reasons For Condonation Of Delay Properly. 2. Because The Learned Cit(A) Has Failed To Appreciate That The High-Pitched Assessment Order Has Been Passed Simply On Conjectures & Surmises Without Appreciating The Submissions On Record & Also Without Giving Proper Opportunity Of Being Heard. 3. Because The Learned Ao As Well As The Learned Cit(A) Have Failed To Appreciate That The Computer Illiterate Rural Trader With Small Turnover Never Got Information About Notices Sent On Portal & Was Prevented Reasonable Responding.

For Appellant: Sh. Arvind Shukla, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Sudipta Paul, Sr. DR
Section 147Section 148Section 44ASection 68Section 69ASection 80C