Section 80A(2) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.122

Section 80A(2) falls under section 80A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 122 (Deductions to be made in computing total income) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 122 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 80A(2) is CIT v. Kotagiri Industrial Co-operative Tea Factory Ltd. (224 ITR 605), cited in 25 of the 26 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 80A(2)

CIT v. Kotagiri Industrial Co-operative Tea Factory Ltd.
224 ITR 605 · 1997 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

Gross total income must be computed by setting off losses, including brought-forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation, before any deductions under Chapter VI-A can be considered. Deductions under Chapter VI-A are only available if the resulting gross total income is positive.

CIT v. Sona Koyo Steering Systems Ltd.
321 ITR 463 · 2010 · High Court
18
citing judgments

Each industrial undertaking must be considered independently when calculating deductions under Section 80-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961, even if the assessee has multiple units and incurs losses in one unit while making profits in another.

IPCA Laboratory Ltd. v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai
12 SCC 742 · 2004 · Reported
10
citing judgments

When computing deductions under Section 80HHC, profits from the export of self-manufactured goods and trading goods cannot be considered separately if there is a loss in one, and the deduction is admissible if the overall business income is positive after set-off.

CIT v. RPG Telecom Ltd. (Kar)
292 ITR 355 · 2007 · Reported
9
citing judgments
CIT v. Nima Specific Family Trust
248 ITR 29 · 2001 · High Court
8
citing judgments
CIT v. Sundravel Match Industries Pvt Ltd. (MAD)
245 ITR 605 · 2000 · Reported
7
citing judgments
Commissioner of Income-Tax, Tamil Nadu- III, Madras v. Madras Motors (P) Ltd.
150 ITR 150 · 1984 · Reported
3
citing judgments
Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Lucky Laboratories Ltd.
284 ITR 435 · 2006 · High Court
3
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 80A(2)

DCIT, Central Circle - 3(3), Kolkata vs. M/S. Kaushalya Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed

ITA 2544/KOL/2018[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 May 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A Nos.2543&2544/Kol/2018 Assessment Years: 2006-07 & 2007-08 Dcit, Central Circle-3(3), Kolkata............................................……Appellant Vs. M/S Kaushalya Infra. Development Corp. Ltd.........…….....…..…..Respondent Hb-170, Sector-Iii, Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700106. [Pan: Aacck1581F] Appearances By: Shri P. P Barman, Addl. Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Miraj D. Shah, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 05, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : May 01, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: Both The Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Dated 28.09.2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-21, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). Since, Common Issues Are Involved In Both The Appeals, Hence These Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order. The Appeal In Ita No.2543/Kol/2018 For Assessment Year 2006-07 Is Taken As Lead Case For The Purpose Of Narration Of Facts. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Original Assessment In The Case Of The Assessee Was Completed U/S 143(3) Of The Act On 31.12.2008. In The Said Assessment, The Claim Of Deduction U/S 80Ia(4) Of Rs.

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 801ASection 80I

DCIT, Central Circle - 3(3), Kolkata vs. M/S. Kaushalya Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are treated as partly allowed

ITA 2543/KOL/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 May 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Dr. Manish Boradi.T.A Nos.2543&2544/Kol/2018 Assessment Years: 2006-07 & 2007-08 Dcit, Central Circle-3(3), Kolkata............................................……Appellant Vs. M/S Kaushalya Infra. Development Corp. Ltd.........…….....…..…..Respondent Hb-170, Sector-Iii, Salt Lake City, Kolkata-700106. [Pan: Aacck1581F] Appearances By: Shri P. P Barman, Addl. Cit-Dr, Appeared On Behalf Of The Appellant. Shri Miraj D. Shah, Ar, Appeared On Behalf Of The Respondent. Date Of Concluding The Hearing : April 05, 2023 Date Of Pronouncing The Order : May 01, 2023 आदेश / Order संजय गग", "या"यक सद"य "वारा / Per Sanjay Garg: Both The Appeals Have Been Preferred By The Revenue Against The Separate Orders Dated 28.09.2018 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-21, Kolkata [Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Cit(A)’] Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act (Hereinafter Referred To As The ‘Act’). Since, Common Issues Are Involved In Both The Appeals, Hence These Have Been Heard Together & Are Being Disposed Of By This Common Order. The Appeal In Ita No.2543/Kol/2018 For Assessment Year 2006-07 Is Taken As Lead Case For The Purpose Of Narration Of Facts. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Original Assessment In The Case Of The Assessee Was Completed U/S 143(3) Of The Act On 31.12.2008. In The Said Assessment, The Claim Of Deduction U/S 80Ia(4) Of Rs.

Section 143(3)Section 250Section 801ASection 80I

Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT 8(3), Mumbai

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 4602/MUM/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Feb 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Rajendra & Ram Lal Negiआयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./I.T.A./4602 & 4603/Mum/2014, िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" /Assessment Year: 2005-06&2006-07 आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" M/S.Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Ltd. Dcit, -8(1) (Formerly Known As Transworks Information Services Ltd.) Aayakar Bhavan. M.K. Road (Now Known As Minacs Ltd.) Mumbai-400 020. Symphony It Park, 8Th, 9Th & 10Th Floor Vs. Chandivali Farm Road, Chandivali Andheri East, Mumbai-400 072 Pan:Aaact 1567 A (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) आयकर वष" /Assessment Year: 2005-06&2006-07 आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./I.T.A./4469 & 4470/Mum/2014, िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Dcit, -8(1)Aayakar Bhavan. Vs. M/S.Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Ltd. M.K. Roadmumbai-400 020. Mumbai-400 072. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Revenue By: Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav-Dr Assessee By: Shri Ronak Doshi-Ar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 16.02.2017 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 16.02.2017 आयकर आयकर आयकर अिधिनयम आयकर अिधिनयम अिधिनयम,1961 क" अिधिनयम क" क" धारा क" धारा धारा 254(1)केकेकेके अ"तग"त धारा अ"तग"त अ"तग"त आदेश अ"तग"त आदेश आदेश आदेश Order U/S.254(1)Of The Income-Tax Act,1961(Act) लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य राजे"" राजे"" केकेकेके अनुसार अनुसार Per Rajendra, Am- लेखा लेखा सद"य सद"य राजे"" राजे"" अनुसार अनुसार Challenging The Orders Dated 18/03/2014 Of The Cit (A)-16 Mumbai,The Assessing Officer (Ao)And The Assessee Have Filed Cross Appeals For The Above-Mentioned Assessment Years (Ay.S.).Assessee-Company Is Engaged In The Business Of Information Technology Enabled Services.As The Issues Involved In Both The Years Are Common,So,A Single Order Is Being Passed.

For Appellant: Shri Ronak Doshi-ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav-DR
Section 10Section 10ASection 254(1)Section 72Section 80ASection 80B(5)

DCIT 8(1), Mumbai vs. Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide P.Ltd, Mumbai

The appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

ITA 4469/MUM/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai16 Feb 2017AY 2005-06

Bench: S/Shri Rajendra & Ram Lal Negiआयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./I.T.A./4602 & 4603/Mum/2014, िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" /Assessment Year: 2005-06&2006-07 आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" M/S.Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Ltd. Dcit, -8(1) (Formerly Known As Transworks Information Services Ltd.) Aayakar Bhavan. M.K. Road (Now Known As Minacs Ltd.) Mumbai-400 020. Symphony It Park, 8Th, 9Th & 10Th Floor Vs. Chandivali Farm Road, Chandivali Andheri East, Mumbai-400 072 Pan:Aaact 1567 A (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) आयकर वष" /Assessment Year: 2005-06&2006-07 आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./I.T.A./4469 & 4470/Mum/2014, िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Dcit, -8(1)Aayakar Bhavan. Vs. M/S.Aditya Birla Minacs Worldwide Ltd. M.K. Roadmumbai-400 020. Mumbai-400 072. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Revenue By: Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav-Dr Assessee By: Shri Ronak Doshi-Ar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 16.02.2017 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 16.02.2017 आयकर आयकर आयकर अिधिनयम आयकर अिधिनयम अिधिनयम,1961 क" अिधिनयम क" क" धारा क" धारा धारा 254(1)केकेकेके अ"तग"त धारा अ"तग"त अ"तग"त आदेश अ"तग"त आदेश आदेश आदेश Order U/S.254(1)Of The Income-Tax Act,1961(Act) लेखा सद"य लेखा सद"य राजे"" राजे"" केकेकेके अनुसार अनुसार Per Rajendra, Am- लेखा लेखा सद"य सद"य राजे"" राजे"" अनुसार अनुसार Challenging The Orders Dated 18/03/2014 Of The Cit (A)-16 Mumbai,The Assessing Officer (Ao)And The Assessee Have Filed Cross Appeals For The Above-Mentioned Assessment Years (Ay.S.).Assessee-Company Is Engaged In The Business Of Information Technology Enabled Services.As The Issues Involved In Both The Years Are Common,So,A Single Order Is Being Passed.

For Appellant: Shri Ronak Doshi-ARFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar Yadav-DR
Section 10Section 10ASection 254(1)Section 72Section 80ASection 80B(5)