Section 41(2) of the Income Tax Act

A liability recognized in accordance with the Accounting Standards prescribed by the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) is an allowable expense for income tax purposes.

Compensatory interest or damages paid for a breach of contract, arising in the normal course of business, are allowable as a deduction under section 37(1) as wholly and exclusively incurred for business purposes. This principle extends to indirect taxes paid in the course of business, which are admissible as business expenditure.

When claiming an expenditure under section 37(1), the onus is on the assessee to prove the necessary facts, not on the revenue. Mere production of vouchers is insufficient if the genuineness of payment is doubted.

A non-compete fee, being a capital expenditure, is not allowable as a deduction from income and does not qualify for depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Depreciation is allowable on a non-compete fee as it constitutes an intangible asset, even if the right acquired cannot be transferred, provided it is treated as part of a block of assets.

Damages or penalties that are compensatory in nature are allowable as a deduction under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, while those that are penal and arise from a breach of law are not allowable as business expenditure.

Depreciation is allowable on non-compete fees when a businessman pays another to restrain them from competing, as this constitutes an intangible asset.

A non-compete fee is considered an intangible asset. The right acquired under a non-compete agreement is 'in personam'.

Depreciation is allowable on a non-compete fee paid as part of an acquisition, as it is an identifiable asset with a quantifiable life. The Assessing Officer's disallowance is not upheld.

A non-compete fee is considered an intangible asset eligible for depreciation under Section 32(1)(ii).