Section 277 of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.482

Section 277 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 482 (False statement in verification, etc) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 482 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

29 judgments on BharatTax turn on Section 277.

Judgments on Section 277

ACIT, Circle-3, Mirzapur vs. M/S N Chaurasia Associates, Sonebhadra (Aajfm0374N)

In the result, while the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed the appeal of the Department is held to be allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 41/ALLD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Dec 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2014-15 Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S N. Chaurasia Associates, Income Tax, Circle-3, Mirzapur Shaktinagar, Sonebhadra Pan:Aajfm0374N (Appellant) (Respondent) & A.Y. 2014-15 M/S N. Chaurasia Associates, Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Khadia Bazar, Shaktinagar, Tax, Circle-Iii, Mirzapur Sonebhadra Pan:Aajfm0374N (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. Navin C. Agrawal, C.A. & Ms. Nita Goyal, C.A. Revenue By: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 25.10.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 31.12.2024 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M.: These Two Appeals For Have Both Been Filed Against The Order Under Section 250 Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Allahabad On 10.01.2019. The Grounds Of Appeal Preferred By The Revenue In Ita No. 41/Alld/2019, Are As Under:- "Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law The Ld.Cit(A) Has Not Erred In Allowing The Relief Of Rs. 6,51,65,031/- By Accepting The Assessee'S Statement That The Receipts Are From Its Business Activity In Civil Construction Without Any Verifiable A.Y. 2014-15 M/S N. Chaurasia Associates

For Appellant: Sh. Navin C. Agrawal, C.A. & Ms. NitaFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 139(5)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 250

M/S N Chaurasia Associates, Sonebhadra vs. ACIT, Mirzapur

In the result, while the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed the appeal of the Department is held to be allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 29/ALLD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Allahabad31 Dec 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastava & Sh. Nikhil Choudharya.Y. 2014-15 Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S N. Chaurasia Associates, Income Tax, Circle-3, Mirzapur Shaktinagar, Sonebhadra Pan:Aajfm0374N (Appellant) (Respondent) & A.Y. 2014-15 M/S N. Chaurasia Associates, Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Khadia Bazar, Shaktinagar, Tax, Circle-Iii, Mirzapur Sonebhadra Pan:Aajfm0374N (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Sh. Navin C. Agrawal, C.A. & Ms. Nita Goyal, C.A. Revenue By: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 25.10.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 31.12.2024 O R D E R Per Nikhil Choudhary, A.M.: These Two Appeals For Have Both Been Filed Against The Order Under Section 250 Passed By The Ld. Cit(A), Allahabad On 10.01.2019. The Grounds Of Appeal Preferred By The Revenue In Ita No. 41/Alld/2019, Are As Under:- "Whether On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law The Ld.Cit(A) Has Not Erred In Allowing The Relief Of Rs. 6,51,65,031/- By Accepting The Assessee'S Statement That The Receipts Are From Its Business Activity In Civil Construction Without Any Verifiable A.Y. 2014-15 M/S N. Chaurasia Associates

For Appellant: Sh. Navin C. Agrawal, C.A. & Ms. NitaFor Respondent: Sh. Amalendu Nath Mishra, CIT DR
Section 139(5)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 250

M/S Shahnawaj Quereshi, Meerut vs. ACIT, Meerut

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3454/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jan 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N. S. Saini & Shri Kuldip Singhassessment Year 2013-14 M/S. Shahnawaj Vs Asst. Cit, Circle-2, Quereshi, Meerut. M/S. Gmc International, H. No.123, Pocket A, Samar Garden, Fathoullapur Road, Meerut. (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Rajiv Singhal, Adv. & Shri Ramit Kakkar, Adv. Respondent By : Shri S.S. Rana, Cit & Shri Yogesh Sharma, Sr.D.R. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 08/01/2019 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 31/01/2019 Order Per N.S. Saini, A. M. This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Impugned Order Of Learned Cit(A), Meerut Dated 24.03.2017 For The Assessment Year 2013-14. The Sole Ground Of Appeal Taken By The Assessee In This Appeal Reads As Under. “1. The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Sustaining Disallowance Of Alleged Bogus Purchase Of Rs.5,20,15,994/-. Observation Made, Inferences Drawn & Findings Recorded Are Against The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case.” 2. The Assessing Officer Observed In His Order That Assessee Has Made Purchase Of Raw Meat From 15 Parties As Under. 2 “1. Mohd. Chand Rs.18,90,000/- 2. Mohd. Ashraf Rs.18,90,000/- 3. Babu Ji Aaftab Rs. 19,04,000/- 4. Raju S/O Kalava Rs.18,90,000/- 5. Irfan Qureshi Rs. 26,25,000/- 6. Aijaj Ahmad Rs.18,90,000/- 7. Shahin Rs.18,90,000/- 8. Mohd. Mansoor Rs.18,90,000/- 9. Mohd. Nazim Rs.18,20,000/- 10. Mohd. Yasin Rs.14,27,744/- 11. Mohd. Sazid Rs.1,04,79,000/- 12. Mohd. Rais Rs.1,78,64,000/- 13. Mohd. Deedar Rs.18,48,000/- 14. Sufiyan Rs.14,85,000/- 15. Valil Urf Vakiluddin Rs.12,23,250/- Total Rs.5,20,15,994/-”

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Singhal, Adv. &For Respondent: Shri S.S. Rana, CIT & Shri
Section 131