Section 23(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.21

Section 23(1)(a) falls under section 23 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 21 (Determination of annual value) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 21 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 23(1)(a) is CIT v. Tip Top Typography (368 ITR 330), cited in 161 of the 272 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 23(1)(a)

CIT v. Tip Top Typography
368 ITR 330 · 2014 · High Court
161
citing judgments

For computing income from house property, the Annual Letting Value (ALV) cannot be arbitrarily estimated by the Assessing Officer, but must be determined based on the Municipal ratable value of the property.

CIT v. Moni Kumar Subba
333 ITR 38 · 2011 · High Court
78
citing judgments

Notional interest on an interest-free security deposit cannot be considered as actual or deemed rent under Section 23(1) of the Act. For determining Annual Letting Value (ALV) under Section 23(1)(a), it must be in accordance with municipal laws, considering extraneous circumstances, but not exceeding the standard rent as per rent control legislation.

Narendra & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.10 8
7 SCC 714 · 2011 · Reported
69
citing judgments

The benefit of higher compensation should be granted to landowners who could not approach the court, based on evidence of solitary sale deeds or small pieces of land.

CIT v. Ajax Products Ltd.
55 ITR 741 · 1965 · Supreme Court
63
citing judgments

A taxing statute must be strictly construed: the subject is not to be taxed unless the charging provision clearly and explicitly imposes the obligation, without room for intendment or implication. There is no equity about a tax, and nothing is to be read into or implied within the language used.

Radha Devi Dalmia v. CIT
125 ITR 134 · 1980 · High Court
55
citing judgments

When determining income from house property under Section 23, the Annual Letable Value (ALV) can be estimated by deeming 7% of the property's value as notional rent, particularly when actual rent or other clear basis for ALV is absent.

Commissioner of Income Tax v. J. K. Investors (Bombay) Ltd.
248 ITR 723 · 2001 · High Court
47
citing judgments

The annual value of house property under Section 23 of the Income Tax Act cannot include notional interest on interest-free security deposits received from tenants. Notional interest cannot be added to an interest-free security deposit to arrive at the annual value for income from house property.

Smitaben N. Ambani v. CWT
323 ITR 104 · 2010 · High Court
44
citing judgments

The annual value of a self-occupied property, for both wealth tax and income tax purposes, is the reasonable rent expected from a hypothetical tenant. When using municipal ratable value, statutory deductions permissible under municipal law must be added back to arrive at this expected rent.

Premsudha Exports (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT
110 ITD 158 · 2008 · ITAT
41
citing judgments

For the purpose of computing income from house property, the annual value under Section 23 must be determined even if the property is vacant or not actually let out, as the statutory phrase "property is let out" does not necessitate actual letting.

CIT v. Smt. Prabhabati Bansali
141 ITR 419 · 1983 · High Court
36
citing judgments

The annual value of a house property for income tax purposes is to be determined based on the higher of the actual rent received or the annual value determined by the municipal/local authority, provided the municipal assessment is contemporaneous and reflects the true annual value. In cases where the property is self-occupied or not actually let, the municipal valuation serves as a reasonable guide for determining the annual letting value.

105 ITR 92 (SC); Aphali Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra
4 SCC 378 · 1975 · Supreme Court
27
citing judgments

The meaning and intention of a statute must be gathered from its plain and unambiguous language, rather than from the court's notions of what is just or expedient. The scope of what is covered must be determined by a fair and straightforward reading of the statutory text.

Judgments on Section 23(1)(a)

M/S. Dhirajlal Amichand Shah & Others, Mumbai vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, -27, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 997/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey, Jm & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.997/Mum/2022 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18) M/S. Dhirajlal Amichand Pcit-27, Mumbai बिधम/ Shah & Others Room No. 401, 4Th Floor, Vs. C-06 Apmc Market I, Tower No. 6, Vashi Masala Bazar, Phase Ii, Railway Station Vashi, Navi Mumbai- Commercial Complex, 400705. Vashi, Navi Mumbai- 4000703. स्थधयी लेखध सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aarfa4544L (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri Dharan Gandhi Revenue By: Shri S. H. Usmani (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 25/11/2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 03/02/2023 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm: This Is An Appeal Preferred By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-27, [Hereinafter Referred To As The “Pcit”], Mumbai Dated 10.03.2022 For Assessment Year 2017-18 Passed Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”).

For Appellant: Shri Dharan GandhiFor Respondent: Shri S. H. Usmani (DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 23(1)(a)Section 24Section 263