Section 23(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.21

Section 23(1)(a) falls under section 23 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 21 (Determination of annual value) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 21 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 23(1)(a) is CIT v. Tip Top Typography (368 ITR 330), cited in 161 of the 272 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 23(1)(a)

CIT v. Tip Top Typography
368 ITR 330 · 2014 · High Court
161
citing judgments

For computing income from house property, the Annual Letting Value (ALV) cannot be arbitrarily estimated by the Assessing Officer, but must be determined based on the Municipal ratable value of the property.

CIT v. Moni Kumar Subba
333 ITR 38 · 2011 · High Court
78
citing judgments

Notional interest on an interest-free security deposit cannot be considered as actual or deemed rent under Section 23(1) of the Act. For determining Annual Letting Value (ALV) under Section 23(1)(a), it must be in accordance with municipal laws, considering extraneous circumstances, but not exceeding the standard rent as per rent control legislation.

Narendra & Ors. v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.10 8
7 SCC 714 · 2011 · Reported
69
citing judgments

The benefit of higher compensation should be granted to landowners who could not approach the court, based on evidence of solitary sale deeds or small pieces of land.

CIT v. Ajax Products Ltd.
55 ITR 741 · 1965 · Supreme Court
63
citing judgments

A taxing statute must be strictly construed: the subject is not to be taxed unless the charging provision clearly and explicitly imposes the obligation, without room for intendment or implication. There is no equity about a tax, and nothing is to be read into or implied within the language used.

Radha Devi Dalmia v. CIT
125 ITR 134 · 1980 · High Court
55
citing judgments

When determining income from house property under Section 23, the Annual Letable Value (ALV) can be estimated by deeming 7% of the property's value as notional rent, particularly when actual rent or other clear basis for ALV is absent.

Commissioner of Income Tax v. J. K. Investors (Bombay) Ltd.
248 ITR 723 · 2001 · High Court
47
citing judgments

The annual value of house property under Section 23 of the Income Tax Act cannot include notional interest on interest-free security deposits received from tenants. Notional interest cannot be added to an interest-free security deposit to arrive at the annual value for income from house property.

Smitaben N. Ambani v. CWT
323 ITR 104 · 2010 · High Court
44
citing judgments

The annual value of a self-occupied property, for both wealth tax and income tax purposes, is the reasonable rent expected from a hypothetical tenant. When using municipal ratable value, statutory deductions permissible under municipal law must be added back to arrive at this expected rent.

Premsudha Exports (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT
110 ITD 158 · 2008 · ITAT
41
citing judgments

For the purpose of computing income from house property, the annual value under Section 23 must be determined even if the property is vacant or not actually let out, as the statutory phrase "property is let out" does not necessitate actual letting.

CIT v. Smt. Prabhabati Bansali
141 ITR 419 · 1983 · High Court
36
citing judgments

The annual value of a house property for income tax purposes is to be determined based on the higher of the actual rent received or the annual value determined by the municipal/local authority, provided the municipal assessment is contemporaneous and reflects the true annual value. In cases where the property is self-occupied or not actually let, the municipal valuation serves as a reasonable guide for determining the annual letting value.

105 ITR 92 (SC); Aphali Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. State of Maharashtra
4 SCC 378 · 1975 · Supreme Court
27
citing judgments

The meaning and intention of a statute must be gathered from its plain and unambiguous language, rather than from the court's notions of what is just or expedient. The scope of what is covered must be determined by a fair and straightforward reading of the statutory text.

Judgments on Section 23(1)(a)

DCIT Cen Cir 23, Mumbai vs. Rajendra Barot, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the revenue for the assessment year 2006-

ITA 2965/MUM/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Dec 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.2883/Mum/2011 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2006-07) फनाभ/ Shri Rajendra Barot, Dcit, Central Circle 23, 601, Shri Amba Shanti Chambers, R.No. 409, Vs. Opp. Hotel Leela, Aayakar Bhavan, Andheri Kurla Road, M.K. Marg, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400020. Mumbai – 400 059. स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./ Pan : Aenpb9154P (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.2965/Mum/2011 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2006-07) फनाभ/ Dcit, Central Circle 23, Shri Rajendra Barot, R.No. 409, Aayakar Bhavan, Opp. Hotel Leela, Andheri Vs. M.K. Marg, Mumbai-20. Kurla Road, Andheri (E), Mumbai – 400 059. स्थामी रेखा सं./ Pan : Aenpb9154P (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.2887 & 2888/Mum/2011 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08) Mrs.Rekha Barot, फनाभ/ Dcit, Central Circle 23, 601, Shri Amba Shanti Chambers, R.No. 409, Vs. Opp. Hotel Leela, Aayakar Bhavan, Andheri Kurla Road, M.K. Marg, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400020. Mumbai – 400 059. स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./ Pan : Aenpb5677H (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Anuj KishnadwalaFor Respondent: Shri K B Shukla
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 23(1)(a)Section 24

Rekha Barot, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cen Cir 23, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the revenue for the assessment year 2006-

ITA 2888/MUM/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Dec 2016AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.2883/Mum/2011 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2006-07) फनाभ/ Shri Rajendra Barot, Dcit, Central Circle 23, 601, Shri Amba Shanti Chambers, R.No. 409, Vs. Opp. Hotel Leela, Aayakar Bhavan, Andheri Kurla Road, M.K. Marg, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400020. Mumbai – 400 059. स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./ Pan : Aenpb9154P (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.2965/Mum/2011 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2006-07) फनाभ/ Dcit, Central Circle 23, Shri Rajendra Barot, R.No. 409, Aayakar Bhavan, Opp. Hotel Leela, Andheri Vs. M.K. Marg, Mumbai-20. Kurla Road, Andheri (E), Mumbai – 400 059. स्थामी रेखा सं./ Pan : Aenpb9154P (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.2887 & 2888/Mum/2011 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08) Mrs.Rekha Barot, फनाभ/ Dcit, Central Circle 23, 601, Shri Amba Shanti Chambers, R.No. 409, Vs. Opp. Hotel Leela, Aayakar Bhavan, Andheri Kurla Road, M.K. Marg, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400020. Mumbai – 400 059. स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./ Pan : Aenpb5677H (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Anuj KishnadwalaFor Respondent: Shri K B Shukla
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 23(1)(a)Section 24

Rekha Barot, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cen Cir 23, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the revenue for the assessment year 2006-

ITA 2887/MUM/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Dec 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.2883/Mum/2011 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2006-07) फनाभ/ Shri Rajendra Barot, Dcit, Central Circle 23, 601, Shri Amba Shanti Chambers, R.No. 409, Vs. Opp. Hotel Leela, Aayakar Bhavan, Andheri Kurla Road, M.K. Marg, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400020. Mumbai – 400 059. स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./ Pan : Aenpb9154P (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.2965/Mum/2011 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2006-07) फनाभ/ Dcit, Central Circle 23, Shri Rajendra Barot, R.No. 409, Aayakar Bhavan, Opp. Hotel Leela, Andheri Vs. M.K. Marg, Mumbai-20. Kurla Road, Andheri (E), Mumbai – 400 059. स्थामी रेखा सं./ Pan : Aenpb9154P (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.2887 & 2888/Mum/2011 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08) Mrs.Rekha Barot, फनाभ/ Dcit, Central Circle 23, 601, Shri Amba Shanti Chambers, R.No. 409, Vs. Opp. Hotel Leela, Aayakar Bhavan, Andheri Kurla Road, M.K. Marg, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400020. Mumbai – 400 059. स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./ Pan : Aenpb5677H (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Anuj KishnadwalaFor Respondent: Shri K B Shukla
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 23(1)(a)Section 24

Rajendra Barot, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cen Cir 23, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the revenue for the assessment year 2006-

ITA 2883/MUM/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai20 Dec 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.2883/Mum/2011 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2006-07) फनाभ/ Shri Rajendra Barot, Dcit, Central Circle 23, 601, Shri Amba Shanti Chambers, R.No. 409, Vs. Opp. Hotel Leela, Aayakar Bhavan, Andheri Kurla Road, M.K. Marg, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400020. Mumbai – 400 059. स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./ Pan : Aenpb9154P (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.2965/Mum/2011 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2006-07) फनाभ/ Dcit, Central Circle 23, Shri Rajendra Barot, R.No. 409, Aayakar Bhavan, Opp. Hotel Leela, Andheri Vs. M.K. Marg, Mumbai-20. Kurla Road, Andheri (E), Mumbai – 400 059. स्थामी रेखा सं./ Pan : Aenpb9154P (अऩीराथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. Nos.2887 & 2888/Mum/2011 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Years : 2006-07 & 2007-08) Mrs.Rekha Barot, फनाभ/ Dcit, Central Circle 23, 601, Shri Amba Shanti Chambers, R.No. 409, Vs. Opp. Hotel Leela, Aayakar Bhavan, Andheri Kurla Road, M.K. Marg, Andheri (E), Mumbai-400020. Mumbai – 400 059. स्थधयी ऱेखध सं./ Pan : Aenpb5677H (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

For Appellant: Shri Anuj KishnadwalaFor Respondent: Shri K B Shukla
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 23(1)(a)Section 24