Section 206C of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.394

Section 206C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 394 (Collection of tax at source) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 394 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 206C is Kourani v. Union OF India (83 Taxmann.com 137), cited in 1,708 of the 269 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 206C

Kourani v. Union OF India
83 Taxmann.com 137 · 2017 · High Court
1,708
citing judgments

The fee under Section 234E for late filing of TDS/TCS statements cannot be levied retrospectively by processing an intimation under Section 200A for defaults occurring before the amendment allowing such processing.

2.8 In Conceria International (P.) Ltd. v. ITO
157 Taxmann.com 335 · 2023 · High Court
31
citing judgments

The levy of fees under section 234E for delayed filing of quarterly TDS returns is confirmed as per the binding precedent of Conceria International (P.) Ltd. The court also considered that Section 200A(1)(c) was not introduced during the Assessment Years 2012-13.

Anglo French Textile Company Ltd. v. CIT
23 ITR 101 · 1953 · Supreme Court
21
citing judgments

Profits attributable to a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India can be conservatively estimated, such as by applying a percentage of global profits to Indian sales, when the PE's activities in India are minimal.

CIT v. Adisankara Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd.
362 ITR 233 · 2014 · High Court
14
citing judgments

A technical breach of filing a statutory form, such as Form 27C, can be condoned. No liability under section 206C(6A) or 206C(7) can be fastened on the assessee if the statutory form is filed, even if not furnished in time.

Chandmal Sancheti v. ITO
72 Taxmann.com 237 · 2016 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

An assessee should be granted the benefit of a declaration filed at the appellate stage, even if delayed, as appeals are a continuation of assessment proceedings. The delay in filing declarations under section 206C(1A) should not be a ground to deny the benefit to the assessee.

Lampmaster Wolters India P. Ltd. v. ITO
141 Taxmann.com 149 · 2022 · ITAT
12
citing judgments

Late fees under section 234E can be levied for belated TDS returns filed, and processed, on or after June 1, 2015, in line with amendments to section 200A.

383 (Mad.), Nila Bakers and Confectionaries (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO
139 Taxmann.com 535 · 2022 · High Court
11
citing judgments

The levy of late fees under Section 234E of the Income-tax Act is illegal for TDS returns concerning periods prior to June 1, 2015. This is because Section 234E does not apply to assessment years before this date.

G.K. Traders v. ITO
143 Taxmann.com 425 · 2022 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

Delay in filing a buyer's declaration under Section 206C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, does not empower the Assessing Officer to deny the benefit of the declaration to the assessee.

Eurotech Maritime Academy (P.) Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer (TDS)
137 Taxmann.com 63 · 2022 · High Court
7
citing judgments
CIT (TDS) v. Priya Blue Industries (P.) Ltd.
65 Taxmann.com 206 · 2016 · High Court
7
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 206C

Secutech Automation (India) P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. Addl CIT (TDS) RG 3, Mumbai

ITA 961/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai21 Jul 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Sh.Rajendra & C.N. Prasadआयकर आयकर अपील अपील संसंसंसं./Ita.S./961-963/Mum/2014,िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" /Assessment Year: 2009-10 To2011-12 आयकर आयकर अपील अपील िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" Secutech Automation(India)Pvt.Ltd. Addl.Cit(Tds)Range-4 Nararyan Bhuvan,D L Vaidya Rd. K G Mittal Ayurvedic Hospital Bldg. Vs. Dadar,Mumbai-400028 Charni Road. Pan:Aaics 2475 F (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Revenue By: Shri N. Satya Moorthy-Dr Assessee By: Shri Dharmesh Shah सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 21.07.2016 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement: 21.07.2016 आयकर आयकर अिधिनयम अिधिनयम,1961 क" क" धारा धारा 254(1)केकेकेके अ"तग"त अ"तग"त आदेश आदेश आयकर आयकर अिधिनयम अिधिनयम क" क" धारा धारा अ"तग"त अ"तग"त आदेश आदेश Order U/S.254(1)Of The Income-Tax Act,1961(Act) लेखा सद"य सद"य राजे"" राजे"" केकेकेके अनुसार अनुसार Per Rajendra, Am- लेखा लेखा लेखा सद"य सद"य राजे"" राजे"" अनुसार अनुसार Challenging The Orders,Dated 18/12/2013 Of The Cit (A)-14,Mumbai The Assessee Has Filed The Appeals For The Above-Mentioned Three Assessment Years(Ay.S.).Issue Involved In All The Appeals Is About Levy Of Penalty U/S.272A(2)(K)Of The Act,For Filing Quarterly Returns In Form Number 24Q/26Q Belatedly.So,We Are Adjudicating All The Appeals By Single Order.

For Appellant: Shri Dharmesh shahFor Respondent: Shri N. Satya Moorthy-DR
Section 200Section 206Section 254(1)Section 272A(2)(K)