Section 205 of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.401

Section 205 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 401 (Bar against direct demand on assessee) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 401 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 205 is Yashpal Sahni v. ACIT (293 ITR 539), cited in 38 of the 119 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 205

Yashpal Sahni v. ACIT
293 ITR 539 · 2007 · High Court
38
citing judgments

Once tax has been deducted at source (TDS), the bar of section 205 applies, preventing the deductee from being asked to pay the tax again, even if the deductor fails to deposit the tax or issue TDS certificates.

Kartik Vijaysinh Sonavano v. DCIT
132 Taxmann.com 293 · 2021 · High Court
33
citing judgments

The tax department cannot speculate to deny the benefit of tax deducted at source by the employer to the petitioner.

Yashpal Sahni v. Rekha Hajarnavis
165 Taxmann 144 · 2007 · High Court
27
citing judgments

If a deductor deducts TDS but does not deposit it into the government account, the assessee is not liable for that TDS.

Asst. CIT v. Om Prakash Gattani
242 ITR 638 · 2000 · High Court
18
citing judgments

An assessee cannot be denied the credit of tax deducted at source (TDS) if they produce Form 16A, and any demand notice issued under Section 221(1) for non-payment of tax, when TDS credit is due, cannot be sustained.

Smt. Ansuya Alva v. DCIT
278 ITR 206 · 2005 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Section 205 of the Income Tax Act prevents the tax department from demanding tax from an assessee who has already suffered TDS when the liability has shifted to another entity, such as a liquidator.

LSG Sky Chef India Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT
45 Taxmann.com 256 · 2014 · Reported
11
citing judgments

An assessee cannot be denied credit for Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) solely due to a mismatch in Form 26AS if the mismatch is not attributable to the assessee. The burden of proving why Form 26AS does not reflect all TDS details should not be placed on the assessee.

Sanjay Sudan v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
452 ITR 107 · 2023 · High Court
9
citing judgments
CIT v. Century Plyboards (I) Ltd.
153 Taxmann.com 179 · 2019 · High Court
8
citing judgments
Sumit D Rajani v. ACIT
49 Taxmann.com 31 · 2014 · High Court
6
citing judgments
Pushkar Prabhat Chandra Jain v. UOI
103 Taxmann.com 106 · 2019 · High Court
5
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 205

Bhide Educatio Pvt Ltd., Mumbai vs. ITO 9(2)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 662/MUM/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singhaayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 662/Mum/2020 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2015-16) Bhide Education Pvt. Ltd. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 9(2)(1), B-43, Swapnashilp, Mahant Road, Vs. Mumbai-400 020 Vile Parle (East), Mumbai-400 057 .. (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) स्थामी रेखा िं./Pan No. Aadcb1401E अऩीराथी की ओय े / Appellant By : Shri Saurabh Bhat, Ar प्रत्मथी की ओय े / Respondent By : Shri V.K. Chaturvedi, Dr स नवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 07.10.2021 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 07.10.2021 Aadosa / O R D E R भहावीय स िंह, उऩाध्मक्ष के द्वाया / Per Mahavir Singh, Vp: This Appeal Of The Assessee Is Arising Out Of Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)]-16, Mumbai [In Short Cit(A)], In Appeal No. Cit(A)-16/It-10138/Ito-19(2)(1)/2017- 18 Vide Dated 29.11.2019. The Assessment Was Framed By The Income Tax Officer, Ward-9(2)(1) Mumbai (In Short Ito/ Ao) For The A.Y. 2015-16 Vide Order Dated 31.10.2017 Under Section 143(3) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter ‘The Act’). 2. The Assessee Has Raised Two Inter-Connected Issues In This Appeal & The Issue Is Regarding The Order Of Cit(A) Upholding The Order Of The Assessing Officer In Taxing The Amount Of ₹42,63,641/- Being Interest Income Not Realized Or Has Not Accrued During The Year & Hence Not Taxable. Alternatively, The Assessee Requested That In Case The Interest Is Assessed As 2 Bhide Education Pvt. Ltd.; Ay 15 -16 Income, The Tds Credit Claimed By The Assessee In The Original Returned Of Income Be Allowed. For This, Assessee Has Raised The Following Five Grounds:-

For Appellant: Shri Saurabh Bhat, ARFor Respondent: Shri V.K. Chaturvedi, DR
Section 143(3)Section 205