Section 2(14)(iii)(b) of the Income Tax Act
The decision most relied on for Section 2(14)(iii)(b) is Dr. Motibhai D. Patel v. Commissioner of Income-tax (127 ITR 671), cited in 21 of the 43 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.
Leading authorities on Section 2(14)(iii)(b)
Dr. Motibhai D. Patel v. Commissioner of Income-tax
127 ITR 671 · 1981 · High Court
21
citing judgments
If agricultural operations are being carried out on land at the time of sale and revenue records indicate it is agricultural land, a presumption arises that it is agricultural in character, which the revenue must rebut. Permission to convert land to non-agricultural use does not render it non-agricultural if not obtained before the sale.
CIT v. Ashok Kumar Rathi
404 ITR 173 · 2018 · High Court
15
citing judgments
If land is recorded as agricultural land in revenue records, it is considered agricultural land for tax purposes, entitling the assessee to exemption from tax.
Trib.) 6. Smt. (Dr.) Subha Tripathi v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle
34 Taxmann.com 286 · 2013 · ITAT
7
citing judgments
Commissioner of Income-tax-3 v. Anthony John Pereira\n
425 ITR 134 · 2020 · High Court
5
citing judgments
Delhi). In Ashish Gupta v. ITO
163 Taxmann.com 739 · 2024 · Reported
4
citing judgments
PCIT v. M/s. K.P.R. Developers Ltd.
311 CTR 832 · 2019 · High Court
3
citing judgments