Section 159 of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.302

Section 159 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 302 (Legal representative) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 302 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 159 is Savita Kapila v. ACIT (118 Taxmann.com 46), cited in 98 of the 280 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 159

Savita Kapila v. ACIT
118 Taxmann.com 46 · 2020 · High Court
98
citing judgments

There is no legal requirement for a legal representative to report an assessee's death to the income tax department; consequently, a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 to a deceased person is invalid as it lacks proper jurisdiction.

Sri Nath Suresh Chand Ram Naresh v. CIT
280 ITR 396 · 2006 · High Court
68
citing judgments

Section 292B of the Income Tax Act applies only to procedural irregularities and cannot cure fundamental jurisdictional defects, such as the non-issue of a mandatory Section 148 notice for reassessment or framing an assessment against a non-existing or dead person.

Chandreshbhai Jayantibhai Patel v. ITO
101 Taxmann.com 362 · 2019 · High Court
46
citing judgments

A notice under section 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is a jurisdictional notice and a condition precedent for reassessment. Such a notice issued against a deceased person is valid if the legal representative submits to the Assessing Officer without raising any objection.

Alamelu Veerappan v. ITO
95 Taxmann.com 155 · 2018 · High Court
44
citing judgments

Income tax proceedings initiated or an assessment order passed in the name of a deceased person are void ab initio, as such proceedings are without jurisdiction. Section 159 of the Income Tax Act does not apply if proceedings were not initiated during the assessee's lifetime.

202 ITR 932, CIT v. Durgawati
31 ITR 603 · 1957 · High Court
36
citing judgments

The same income cannot be assessed substantively in multiple hands. However, this principle does not prevent a single consolidated assessment order for multiple legal representatives.

ITO v. Bhupendra Bhikhalal Desai
131 Taxmann.com 40 · 2021 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

Assessment and penalty proceedings initiated against a deceased assessee are invalid if not made in the name of their legal heir.

CIT v. Surat Cotton
202 ITR 932 · 1993 · High Court
25
citing judgments

Income should be taxed only once in the hands of the rightful assessee; substantive assessments cannot be made simultaneously on multiple legal heirs.

Estate of Late Rangalal Jajodia v. CIT
79 ITR 505 · 1971 · Supreme Court
25
citing judgments

An omission or defect in serving a notice required by procedural provisions does not invalidate a tax liability created by substantive charging sections, making the assessment irregular but not void.

ITO Ward 1(3)(7), Surat v. Durlabhbhai Kanubhai Rajpara
114 Taxmann.com 482 · 2020 · Supreme Court
24
citing judgments

An assessment or reassessment proceeding initiated or continued against a deceased person after their demise is illegal and void ab initio, as no valid notice can be issued to a dead individual.

Krishnaawtar Kabra v. ITO
140 Taxmann.com 423 · 2022 · High Court
21
citing judgments

Assessment proceedings initiated against a deceased person are void ab initio, and such proceedings cannot be continued against their legal heirs if no notice was served during the assessee's lifetime or on the legal heir as a "deemed assessee" within the prescribed time.

Judgments on Section 159

ITO Ward-44(6), New Delhi vs. Harsh Arora, Delhi

Appeal of the revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 902/DEL/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 May 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Judical Member & Shri Manish Agarwalincome Tax Officer, Shri Harsh Arora, Ward 44(6), 38-C, Road No. 73, Room No. 1808, Vs. West Punjabi Bagh, E-2 Block, Civic Centre, New Delhi-110002. New Delhi-110026 Pan: Aajpa1520C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Rajeev Saxena, Adv. Ms. Sumangla Saxena, Adv. & Shri Dishant Sethi, Adv. Department By Shri Rajesh Kumar Dhanesta, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 29/05/2025 Date Of Pronouncement 29/05/2025 O R D E R Per Manish Agarwal, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax [Cit(A), In Short], National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) Dt. 19.01.2024 In Appeal No. Cit(A), Delhi- 14/10140/2017-18 For Assessment Year 2015-16 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act, In Short). 2. At The Time Of Hearing, The Ld. Counsel For The Assessee, Vide Letter Dated 29Th May, 2025, Placed On Record, Submitted That The Revenue Has Filed The Appeal In The Name Of Assessee Harsh Arora Who Had Expired On 04.09.2019 I.E. Prior To The Date When The Impugned Order Was Passed By The Ld. Cit(A). He Further Submitted That The Necessary Action Was Already Taken For Bringing The Legal Representative (Lr) On Record In It Portal & Copy Of The Same Is Also Produced Before Us. It Is, Therefore, Submitted By The Ld. Ar That The Appeal Filed By The Revenue Against The Dead Person Is Void & Thus Not Maintainable & Deserves To Be Dismissed. Ito Vs. Harsh Arora

Section 159Section 2Section 2(11)Section 2(29)Section 250