Section 150(1) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.283

Section 150(1) falls under section 150 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 283 (Provision for cases where assessment is in pursuance of an order on appeal, etc) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 283 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 150(1) is Sonic Biochem Extractions (P.) Ltd. v. ITO ( (25 Taxmann.com 25), cited in 63 of the 98 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 150(1)

Sonic Biochem Extractions (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (
25 Taxmann.com 25 · 2012 · ITAT
63
citing judgments

Prior to the jurisdictional High Court's decision in CIT v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. on October 15, 2011, the purchase of off-the-shelf software was not subject to TDS, and therefore, no disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) or 40(a)(ia) could be made.

CIT v. Foramer Finance
251 ITR 416 · 2001 · High Court
41
citing judgments

Reopening assessments is permissible after four years if there was an escapement of income due to the assessee's failure to disclose material facts necessary for assessment, even if the initial assessment involved a change of opinion.

United Electrical Co. Pvt. Ltd. 258 ITR 317 (Del), DCIT v. Lotus Hearbals Pvt. Ltd.
167 Taxmann.com 533 · 2024 · High Court
14
citing judgments

Reassessment proceedings under Section 147 are invalid if the reassessment notice is issued without the necessary sanction from the specified authority as mandated by Section 151. The sanctioning authority must apply its mind to the reasons recorded for reassessment before granting approval.

CSC Technology Singapore Pte. Ltd. v. ADIT
19 Taxmann.com 123 · 2012 · High Court
12
citing judgments

Income is taxable in India if it accrues in India, irrespective of whether it contains a profit element. Taxability of royalty or fees for technical services (FTS) is determined based on their arising in India and payment to a resident of a contracting state under a DTAA.

(1) CIT v. Premier Mills
296 ITR 157 · 2008 · High Court
11
citing judgments

Reopening an assessment under section 148 beyond four years from the relevant assessment year, following an assessment under section 143(3), is only valid if there's a proven failure by the assessee to disclose all material facts. The reassessment cannot be sustained if material facts were available during the original assessment or if it's based on a mere change of opinion.

ltd vs. R.B. Wadekar, 268 ITR 332 Bom. (12) Haryana Acrylic Mfg Co. v. CIT
296 ITR 603 · 2008 · High Court
9
citing judgments
Duli Chand Singhania v. Asstt. CIT
136 Taxmann 725 · 2004 · High Court
8
citing judgments
Bhot Industries Ltd V/s ACIT (2004) 267 ITR 161 (Bomb.), (vii) CIT (Addl) v. IFCI
296 ITR 573 · 2008 · High Court
8
citing judgments
A.B. Parikh v. ITO
203 ITR 186 · 1993 · High Court
7
citing judgments
Caprihans India Ltd. v. Tarun Seem, Deputy CIT
266 ITR 566 · 2004 · High Court
7
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 150(1)