Section 148B of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 148B is 1. Malabar Industrial Company Ltd. v. CIT (332 ITR 231), cited in 23 of the 193 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 148B

1. Malabar Industrial Company Ltd. v. CIT
332 ITR 231 · 2011 · High Court
23
citing judgments

An Assessing Officer's order is not erroneous, in so far as it is prejudicial to the interest of the revenue, solely because the Principal Commissioner disagrees with the AO's conscious decision made after due verification.

6. C. S. Atwal v. CIT Ludhiana & Another
59 Taxmann.com 359 · 2015 · High Court
17
citing judgments

Capital gains are taxable only when there is a transfer of property, and not merely on the execution of an agreement for sale. The registration of an agreement for sale is crucial for determining the nature and taxability of the transaction.

Tiru S. Shyam Kumar v. ACIT
99 Taxmann.com 39 · 2018 · High Court
17
citing judgments
KAD Housing Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT (
469 ITR 32 · 2024 · High Court
15
citing judgments

Assessments reopened under Section 147/148 based on information found during a search under Section 153A/153C require compliance with the conditions laid out in Section 149, as interpreted in relation to the law prior to the Finance Act, 2021.

ACIT v. Ms. Katrina Rosemary Turcotte
87 Taxmann.com 116 · 2017 · ITAT
13
citing judgments

Loose papers without independent corroboration are considered 'dumb documents' and cannot be used as the sole basis for an income tax addition.

Trib.). 12) Utility Supply (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
174 Taxmann.com 250 · 2025 · Reported
11
citing judgments

Mechanical approval of a draft assessment order by a superior authority renders the assessment order void ab initio, as it indicates a lack of proper application of mind.

TR 83 (Del.), Bimal Kumar Anant Kumar Vs. CIT (2007) 159 TAXMAN 402 (All.), Salem Steel Co. v. CIT
377 ITR 158 · 2015 · High Court
11
citing judgments
Trustees Anupam Charitable Trust (1987) 167 ITR (129) (Rajasthan), CIT v. Godawari Sugar Mills Ltd.
160 CTR 107 · 2000 · High Court
6
citing judgments
Commissioner of Income-tax, Faridabad v. Anupam Kapoor
166 Taxmann 178 · 2008 · Reported
5
citing judgments
Homelife Buildcon (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT
176 Taxmann.com 614 · 2025 · Reported
5
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 148B

M/S. Shree Hari Builders, Mumbai vs. The Income Tax Officer Ward 17(3)(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4457/MUM/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Sept 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Smt. Renu Jauhriआयकर अपील सुं./Ita No.4457/Mum/2025 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2013-2014) M/S. Shree Hari V/S. Income Tax Officer, Ward Builders बिाम 17(3)(1), Mumbai 139 2Nd Floor, Seksaria Kautilya Bhavan, C-41 To C- Chambers, N.M. Road, 43, G Block, Bandra Kurla Fort, Mumbai 400023 Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400051 स्थायी लेखा सुं./जीआइआर सुं./Pan/Gir No: Aabfs2234F Appellant/अपीलाथी .. Respondent/प्रधिवादी धििााररिी की ओर से /Assessee By: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, Ca (Virtually Appear) राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By: Shri Ritesh Misra, Cit Dr स िवाई की िारीख / Date Of Hearing 25.08.2025 घोर्णा की िारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 19.09.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Renu Jauhri [A.M.] :- This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi [Cit(A)] Dated 14.05.2025 Passed U/S. 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 [Hereinafter Referred To As “Act”] For Assessment Year 2013-2014. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds In This Appeal.

For Appellant: Shri Rajiv Khandelwal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Ritesh Misra, CIT DR
Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 250