Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.281

Section 148A(b) falls under section 148A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 281 (Procedure before issuance of notice under section 280) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 281 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 148A(b) is Sir Kikabhai Premchand v. CIT (24 ITR 506), cited in 156 of the 524 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 148A(b)

Sir Kikabhai Premchand v. CIT
24 ITR 506 · 1953 · Supreme Court
156
citing judgments

One cannot make a taxable profit or loss from transactions with oneself, as profit only arises from dealings with external third parties, even when transferring assets between different accounts or divisions of the same entity.

CIT v. K.G. Rukminiamma
331 ITR 211 · 2011 · High Court
104
citing judgments

For capital gains exemption under Sections 54 and 54F of the Income Tax Act (prior to the 2015 amendment), the expression "a residential house" includes multiple residential units and should not be construed in the singular, by applying Section 13 of the General Clauses Act.

Mis Yahoo India Pvt Ltd. v. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai), Standard Chartered Bank
307 ITR 59 · 2008 · High Court
90
citing judgments
Vishakapatnam in Smt. Bommana Swarna Rekha v. A. CIT
147 Taxmann 59 · 2005 · Reported
70
citing judgments
Deepak Steel and Power Ltd. v. Central Board of Direct Taxes
174 Taxmann.com 144 · 2025 · Supreme Court
70
citing judgments

Reassessment notices issued after April 1, 2021, for Assessment Year 2015-16 are time-barred. The relaxation provided by the Taxation and Other Laws (Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020, does not extend the period of limitation for such notices.

State of A P v. A P Pensioners Association
13 SCC 161 · 2005 · Reported
37
citing judgments

Legal fictions are to be construed to enable the person for whose benefit they are created to obtain all flowing consequences. This principle applies when determining procedures for reassessment under Section 148, including decisions under Section 149A(d) and issuing notices within the surviving time limit.

Gurdas Garg v. CIT
63 Taxmann.com 289 · 2015 · High Court
37
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 40A(3) can be dispensed with if the assessee proves business expediency for cash payment and verifies the genuineness of the transaction, even if it doesn't fall under Rule 6DD.

ATS Infrastructure Ltd. v. ACIT
166 Taxmann.com 61 · 2024 · High Court
30
citing judgments

Once an addition made based on original reasons recorded for reopening is deleted, other additions not part of those original reasons cannot be sustained.

CIT v. Micron Steels (P.) Ltd.
372 ITR 386 · 2015 · High Court
27
citing judgments

A statutory notice issued in the name of a non-existent entity renders the entire assessment a nullity in the eyes of law.

Giridhar Gopal Dalmia Vs.Union of India v. Ors7
156 Taxmann.com 478 · 2024 · Reported
25
citing judgments

High Courts have allowed writ petitions in favour of assessees concerning issues of jurisdiction.

Judgments on Section 148A(b)

DCIT, Circle-4(1)(1), Ahmedabad, Vejalpur vs. United Tech Ventures Pvt Ltd, C. G. Road, Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is hereby dismissed

ITA 214/AHD/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad22 Jul 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Mrs. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarआयकर अपील सं / Ita No. 214/Ahd/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 बनाम Dcit United Tech Ventures Pvt Ltd., Vs. Circle 4(1)(1), 605, Samedh Complex, Nr. Ahmedabad Associated Petrol Pump, C.G. Road, Ahmedabad-380006 [Pan : Aabcu 0357 N] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) िनधा")रती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Vihar Soni, Ar +,थ. की ओर से / Revenue By : Shri Rignesh Das, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.05.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 22.07.2025 आदेश/O R D E R Per T.R. Senthil Kumar: This Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue As Against The Appellate Order Dated 07.11.2024 Passed By The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Hereinafter Referred To As The “Cit(A)”), Arising Out Of The Reassessment Order Passed Under Section 147 R.W.S. 144B Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As The “The Act” In Short), Relating To The Assessment Year (Ay) 2018-19. 2. The Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee, A Private Limited Company, Filed Its Original Return Of Income For Ay 2018-19 On 01.10.2018, Declaring Rs. Nil Income & Claimed Current Year Loss Of Rs.6,36,309/-. The Assessee Also Filed A Revised Return Claiming Current Year Loss Of Rs.19,34,006/-. The Returns Were Processed Under Regular Assessment Under Section 143(3) & The Order Was Passed On 08.03.2021, Accepting The Returned Loss. Thereafter, The Assessment Was Re-Opened On Account Of Accommodation Entry Of Rs.1.5 Crores Received From Dishman Group. Hence, A Show Cause Notice U/S 148A(B) Of The Act Was Issued To The 2 Dcit Vs. United Tech Ventures Pvt Ltd Ay : 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri Vihar Soni, ARFor Respondent: Shri Rignesh Das, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148ASection 68

Anil Singh, Kolkata vs. I.T.O., Ward - 49(1), Kolkata

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 531/KOL/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata16 Jul 2025AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri George Mathanआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.531/Kol/2025 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2017-2018) Anil Singh Vs Ito Ward-49(1), Kolkata/Nfac 4, Railway Gate, Lalkuthi, Kamarhati, Kolkata Pan No. : Bflps 0954 J (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Advocate राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt. Sima Das Biswas, Jcit-Sr.Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 16/07/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16/07/2025 आदेश / O R D E R This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, Dated 29.07.2024 For The Assessment Year 2017-2018. 2. Shri Soumitra Choudhury, Ld.Ar Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee & Smt. Sima Das Biswas, Ld. Sr.Dr Appeared On Behalf Of The Revenue. 3. The Appeal Of The Assessee Is Barred By 168 Days. In This Regard, The Assessee Has Filed An Application For Condonation Of Delay Stating Therein Sufficient Reasons For Delay, Which Are Plausible & Not Found To Be False. Ld. Sr.Dr Also Did Not Raise Any Serious Objection To Condone The Delay. Accordingly, Delay Of 168 Days In Filing The Present Appeal By The Assessee Is Condoned & The Appeal Is Admitted For Hearing. 4. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar That This Is A Case Of Reopening & Issuance Of Notice U/S.148 Of The Act. It Was The Submission That The Notice

For Appellant: Shri Soumitra Choudhury, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Sima Das Biswas, JCIT-Sr.DR
Section 148Section 148ASection 151