Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.270

Section 143(3) falls under section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 270 (Assessment) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 270 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 143(3) is National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT (229 ITR 383), cited in 5,834 of the 75,154 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 143(3)

National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT
229 ITR 383 · 1998 · Supreme Court
5,834
citing judgments

Appellate authorities can consider new claims and additional grounds if the relevant facts are already on record. The purpose of assessment is to correctly determine tax liability, allowing both parties to raise issues.

Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji
167 ITR 471 · 1987 · Supreme Court
3,926
citing judgments

Delay in filing appeals, when supported by sufficient or justifiable cause, should be condoned with a liberal approach to ensure substantial justice. This principle prioritizes the cause of justice over mere technicalities.

CIT v. Kabul Chawla
380 ITR 573 · 2016 · High Court
3,235
citing judgments

In a search assessment under Section 153A, additions can only be made for completed or non-abated assessment years if incriminating material relevant to those years is found during the search, although notice under Section 153A(1) is mandatorily issued for six assessment years preceding the search.

Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT
243 ITR 83 · 2000 · Supreme Court
2,943
citing judgments

For revision under Section 263, the Assessing Officer's order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue; if either condition is not met, the revisionary jurisdiction cannot be invoked. An order is not erroneous merely because the Assessing Officer did not record the details of enquiries conducted, provided due enquiries were made.

CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.
88 ITR 192 · 1973 · Supreme Court
2,664
citing judgments

When two equally plausible interpretations of a taxing provision are possible, or when conflicting views exist from non-jurisdictional High Courts, the interpretation that favors the assessee must be adopted.

CIT v. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory
359 ITR 565 · 2013 · High Court
2,590
citing judgments

A penalty notice issued under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) is invalid if it fails to specify whether the penalty proceedings are initiated for concealment of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. This non-specification vitiates the penalty proceedings.

Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd.
149 Taxmann.com 399 · 2023 · Supreme Court
2,379
citing judgments

An assessment under section 153A is without jurisdiction if there is an absence of incriminating material for an unabated assessment year.

CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.
38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
2,267
citing judgments

An appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal can be dismissed for non-prosecution or treated as unadmitted when the appellant fails to appear, cooperate, or show diligence, in accordance with Rule 19(2) of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules. The law aids the vigilant, not those who sleep on their rights.

CIT v. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd.
322 ITR 158 · 2010 · Supreme Court
2,228
citing judgments

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealment of income is not automatically leviable if the assessee has made a full disclosure of all particulars and the addition or disallowance arises from a difference of opinion.

CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.
313 ITR 340 · 2009 · High Court
2,118
citing judgments

Where an assessee claims that investments were made out of own funds, interest disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D may not apply if the assessee demonstrates the availability of sufficient interest-free funds to cover such investments.

Judgments on Section 143(3)

Hi Klass Moving Picture P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ACIT Cir 6(3), Mumbai

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 929/MUM/2013[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Sept 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri C.N.Prasad, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./Ita No.926 To 931/Mum/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2002-03 To 2007-08) Hiklass Moving Picture Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cir-6(3), Mumbai Ltd., 607/3, Navjivan Society, Lamingaton Road, Mumbai Central, Mumbai-400008 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaach 1582 K (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारयती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Bhupendra Shah याजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rahul Raman सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 30/08/2016 घोषणा की तायीख/Date Of Pronouncement 30/09/2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A), Mumbai, For The Assessment Years 2002-03 To 2007-08, In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S.143(3) R.W.S.153C Of I.T.Act. 2. Common Grounds Have Been Raised In All The Years Under Consideration. 3. Rival Contentions Have Been Heard & Record Perused. Facts In Brief Are That There Was A Search U/S.132 In The Raisoni-Sancheti Group Of Cases. As A Part Of The Said Group, The Director Of Assessee-Company Shri Chaitanya Kochar Was Also Covered Under The Search Conducted. During The Course Of The Search Undertaken, It Was Found That The Assessee- Company Was A Paper Company Used By The Raisoni-Sancheti Group As A 2

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Shri Rahul Raman
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153ASection 153C

Hi Klass Moving Picture P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ACIT Cir 6(3), Mumbai

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 928/MUM/2013[2004-05]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Sept 2016AY 2004-05

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri C.N.Prasad, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./Ita No.926 To 931/Mum/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2002-03 To 2007-08) Hiklass Moving Picture Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cir-6(3), Mumbai Ltd., 607/3, Navjivan Society, Lamingaton Road, Mumbai Central, Mumbai-400008 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaach 1582 K (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारयती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Bhupendra Shah याजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rahul Raman सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 30/08/2016 घोषणा की तायीख/Date Of Pronouncement 30/09/2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A), Mumbai, For The Assessment Years 2002-03 To 2007-08, In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S.143(3) R.W.S.153C Of I.T.Act. 2. Common Grounds Have Been Raised In All The Years Under Consideration. 3. Rival Contentions Have Been Heard & Record Perused. Facts In Brief Are That There Was A Search U/S.132 In The Raisoni-Sancheti Group Of Cases. As A Part Of The Said Group, The Director Of Assessee-Company Shri Chaitanya Kochar Was Also Covered Under The Search Conducted. During The Course Of The Search Undertaken, It Was Found That The Assessee- Company Was A Paper Company Used By The Raisoni-Sancheti Group As A 2

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Shri Rahul Raman
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153ASection 153C

Hi Klass Moving Picture P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ACIT Cir 6(3), Mumbai

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 927/MUM/2013[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Sept 2016AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri C.N.Prasad, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./Ita No.926 To 931/Mum/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2002-03 To 2007-08) Hiklass Moving Picture Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cir-6(3), Mumbai Ltd., 607/3, Navjivan Society, Lamingaton Road, Mumbai Central, Mumbai-400008 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaach 1582 K (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारयती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Bhupendra Shah याजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rahul Raman सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 30/08/2016 घोषणा की तायीख/Date Of Pronouncement 30/09/2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A), Mumbai, For The Assessment Years 2002-03 To 2007-08, In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S.143(3) R.W.S.153C Of I.T.Act. 2. Common Grounds Have Been Raised In All The Years Under Consideration. 3. Rival Contentions Have Been Heard & Record Perused. Facts In Brief Are That There Was A Search U/S.132 In The Raisoni-Sancheti Group Of Cases. As A Part Of The Said Group, The Director Of Assessee-Company Shri Chaitanya Kochar Was Also Covered Under The Search Conducted. During The Course Of The Search Undertaken, It Was Found That The Assessee- Company Was A Paper Company Used By The Raisoni-Sancheti Group As A 2

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Shri Rahul Raman
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153ASection 153C

Hi Klass Moving Picture P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ACIT Cir 6(3), Mumbai

In the result, all appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 926/MUM/2013[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai30 Sept 2016AY 2002-03

Bench: Shri R.C.Sharma, Am & Shri C.N.Prasad, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./Ita No.926 To 931/Mum/2013 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2002-03 To 2007-08) Hiklass Moving Picture Pvt. Vs. Acit, Cir-6(3), Mumbai Ltd., 607/3, Navjivan Society, Lamingaton Road, Mumbai Central, Mumbai-400008 स्थामी रेखा सं./ जीआइआय सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaach 1582 K (अऩीराथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारयती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Bhupendra Shah याजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Rahul Raman सुनवाई की तायीख / Date Of Hearing : 30/08/2016 घोषणा की तायीख/Date Of Pronouncement 30/09/2016 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A), Mumbai, For The Assessment Years 2002-03 To 2007-08, In The Matter Of Order Passed U/S.143(3) R.W.S.153C Of I.T.Act. 2. Common Grounds Have Been Raised In All The Years Under Consideration. 3. Rival Contentions Have Been Heard & Record Perused. Facts In Brief Are That There Was A Search U/S.132 In The Raisoni-Sancheti Group Of Cases. As A Part Of The Said Group, The Director Of Assessee-Company Shri Chaitanya Kochar Was Also Covered Under The Search Conducted. During The Course Of The Search Undertaken, It Was Found That The Assessee- Company Was A Paper Company Used By The Raisoni-Sancheti Group As A 2

For Appellant: Shri Bhupendra ShahFor Respondent: Shri Rahul Raman
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 147Section 148Section 153Section 153ASection 153C