Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.270

Section 143(2) falls under section 143 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 270 (Assessment) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 270 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 143(2) is National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT (229 ITR 383), cited in 5,834 of the 13,613 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 143(2)

National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT
229 ITR 383 · 1998 · Supreme Court
5,834
citing judgments

Appellate authorities can consider new claims and additional grounds if the relevant facts are already on record. The purpose of assessment is to correctly determine tax liability, allowing both parties to raise issues.

CIT v. Kabul Chawla
380 ITR 573 · 2016 · High Court
3,235
citing judgments

In a search assessment under Section 153A, additions can only be made for completed or non-abated assessment years if incriminating material relevant to those years is found during the search, although notice under Section 153A(1) is mandatorily issued for six assessment years preceding the search.

Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT
243 ITR 83 · 2000 · Supreme Court
2,943
citing judgments

For revision under Section 263, the Assessing Officer's order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue; if either condition is not met, the revisionary jurisdiction cannot be invoked. An order is not erroneous merely because the Assessing Officer did not record the details of enquiries conducted, provided due enquiries were made.

CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.
313 ITR 340 · 2009 · High Court
2,118
citing judgments

Where an assessee claims that investments were made out of own funds, interest disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D may not apply if the assessee demonstrates the availability of sufficient interest-free funds to cover such investments.

Radhasoami Satsang v. CIT
193 ITR 321 · 1992 · Supreme Court
1,695
citing judgments

The principle of consistency applies in tax matters, meaning a fundamental aspect found to be true in one assessment year should not be changed in a subsequent year if the order was not challenged.

CIT v. Kelvinator of India Ltd.
320 ITR 561 · 2010 · Supreme Court
1,673
citing judgments

An Assessing Officer cannot initiate reassessment proceedings under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act based on a mere change of opinion. Reassessment is permissible only when there is fresh tangible material leading to the belief of income escapement, not merely a review of existing facts.

Maxopp Investment Ltd. v. CIT
402 ITR 640 · 2018 · Supreme Court
1,596
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A is not automatic and requires the Assessing Officer to record satisfaction before applying Rule 8D. Only investments yielding exempt income are considered for disallowance, irrespective of their strategic nature.

Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT
378 ITR 33 · 2015 · High Court
1,569
citing judgments

A disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income cannot be made if the assessee has not earned any exempt income during the relevant previous year.

CIT v. Vatika Township Pvt. Ltd.
367 ITR 466 · 2014 · Supreme Court
1,558
citing judgments

Taxing statutes are presumed to operate prospectively unless a clear contrary intention for retrospective application is evident. The law applicable for determining tax liability is that which stands on the first day of the assessment year, following the principle that law looks forward, not backward (lex prospicit non respicit).

CIT v. Simit P. Sheth
356 ITR 451 · 2013 · High Court
1,465
citing judgments

Additions for alleged bogus purchases should be restricted to the profit element, not the entire turnover. The profit element is often estimated at 12.5% of the purported bogus purchases.

Judgments on Section 143(2)

Gujarat Chemical Port Terminal Co. Ltd., Lakhigam vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(1)(1), Vadodara

In the result, assessee’s appeal for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed and for AY

ITA 394/SRT/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalassessment Year : 2013-14 Gujarat Chemical Port Deputy Commissioner Of Terminal Co. Ltd., Vs Income-Tax, Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Circle 1(1)(1), Dist: Bharuch-392130 Vadodara Pan : Aaacg 6861 A Assessment Year : 2013-14 Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat Chemical Port Circle 1(1)(1), Vs Terminal Co. Ltd., Vadodara Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Dist: Bharuch-392130 Pan : Aaacg 6861 A Assessment Year : 2014-15 Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat Chemical Port Circle 1(1)(1), Vs Terminal Co. Ltd., Vadodara Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Dist: Bharuch-392130 Pan : Aaacg 6861 A Assessment Year : 2014-15 Gujarat Chemical Port Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Terminal Co. Ltd., Vs Circle 1(1)(1), Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Vadodara Dist: Bharuch-392130 Pan : Aaacg 6861 A अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Ms. Amrin Pathan, Ca Revenue By : Shri Jamesh Kurian, Cit-Dr & Ms. Pooja Parekh, Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 26/07/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 05/08/2022

For Appellant: Ms. Amrin Pathan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Jamesh Kurian, CIT-DR &
Section 115JSection 143(2)

M/S. Gujarat Chemicals Port Terminal Company Limited, Baroda vs. The DCIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Baroda

In the result, assessee’s appeal for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed and for AY

ITA 2373/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalassessment Year : 2013-14 Gujarat Chemical Port Deputy Commissioner Of Terminal Co. Ltd., Vs Income-Tax, Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Circle 1(1)(1), Dist: Bharuch-392130 Vadodara Pan : Aaacg 6861 A Assessment Year : 2013-14 Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat Chemical Port Circle 1(1)(1), Vs Terminal Co. Ltd., Vadodara Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Dist: Bharuch-392130 Pan : Aaacg 6861 A Assessment Year : 2014-15 Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat Chemical Port Circle 1(1)(1), Vs Terminal Co. Ltd., Vadodara Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Dist: Bharuch-392130 Pan : Aaacg 6861 A Assessment Year : 2014-15 Gujarat Chemical Port Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Terminal Co. Ltd., Vs Circle 1(1)(1), Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Vadodara Dist: Bharuch-392130 Pan : Aaacg 6861 A अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Ms. Amrin Pathan, Ca Revenue By : Shri Jamesh Kurian, Cit-Dr & Ms. Pooja Parekh, Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 26/07/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 05/08/2022

For Appellant: Ms. Amrin Pathan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Jamesh Kurian, CIT-DR &
Section 115JSection 143(2)

The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Baroda vs. M/S. Gujarat Chemical Port Terminal Co. Ltd., Bharuch

In the result, assessee’s appeal for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed and for AY

ITA 2234/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalassessment Year : 2013-14 Gujarat Chemical Port Deputy Commissioner Of Terminal Co. Ltd., Vs Income-Tax, Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Circle 1(1)(1), Dist: Bharuch-392130 Vadodara Pan : Aaacg 6861 A Assessment Year : 2013-14 Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat Chemical Port Circle 1(1)(1), Vs Terminal Co. Ltd., Vadodara Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Dist: Bharuch-392130 Pan : Aaacg 6861 A Assessment Year : 2014-15 Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat Chemical Port Circle 1(1)(1), Vs Terminal Co. Ltd., Vadodara Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Dist: Bharuch-392130 Pan : Aaacg 6861 A Assessment Year : 2014-15 Gujarat Chemical Port Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Terminal Co. Ltd., Vs Circle 1(1)(1), Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Vadodara Dist: Bharuch-392130 Pan : Aaacg 6861 A अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Ms. Amrin Pathan, Ca Revenue By : Shri Jamesh Kurian, Cit-Dr & Ms. Pooja Parekh, Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 26/07/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 05/08/2022

For Appellant: Ms. Amrin Pathan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Jamesh Kurian, CIT-DR &
Section 115JSection 143(2)

The ACIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Baroda vs. Gujarat Chemical Port Terminal Company Ltd., Bharuch

In the result, assessee’s appeal for AY 2013-14 is partly allowed and for AY

ITA 1428/AHD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad05 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalassessment Year : 2013-14 Gujarat Chemical Port Deputy Commissioner Of Terminal Co. Ltd., Vs Income-Tax, Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Circle 1(1)(1), Dist: Bharuch-392130 Vadodara Pan : Aaacg 6861 A Assessment Year : 2013-14 Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat Chemical Port Circle 1(1)(1), Vs Terminal Co. Ltd., Vadodara Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Dist: Bharuch-392130 Pan : Aaacg 6861 A Assessment Year : 2014-15 Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat Chemical Port Circle 1(1)(1), Vs Terminal Co. Ltd., Vadodara Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Dist: Bharuch-392130 Pan : Aaacg 6861 A Assessment Year : 2014-15 Gujarat Chemical Port Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Terminal Co. Ltd., Vs Circle 1(1)(1), Po: Lakhigam, Via Dahej, Tal. Vagra, Vadodara Dist: Bharuch-392130 Pan : Aaacg 6861 A अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Ms. Amrin Pathan, Ca Revenue By : Shri Jamesh Kurian, Cit-Dr & Ms. Pooja Parekh, Sr Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 26/07/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 05/08/2022

For Appellant: Ms. Amrin Pathan, CAFor Respondent: Shri Jamesh Kurian, CIT-DR &
Section 115JSection 143(2)