Section 139A of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.262

Section 139A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 262 (Permanent Account Number. B- Filing of Return of Income) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 262 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

33 judgments on BharatTax turn on Section 139A.

Judgments on Section 139A

M/S P.N. Gadgil & Sons, Pune vs. DCIT, Circle 6, Pune

In the result, the appeal filed by the assesse is partly allowed

ITA 1921/PUN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Pune05 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Shri Vinay Bhamoreआयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1921/Pun/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18 M/S. P. N. Gadgil & Sons, Vs. Dcit, Circle-6, Pune. Abhiruchi Mall, 4Th Floor, 59C Sinhagad Road, Pune- 411041. Pan : Aanfp4476C Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Shri M. R. Bhagwat Revenue By : Shri Arvind Desai Date Of Hearing : 15.01.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 05.03.2025 आदेश / Order Per Vinay Bhamore, Jm: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 02.08.2024 Passed By Ld. Cit(A)/Nfac For The Assessment Year 2017-18. 2. The Appellant Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “1) The Learned Cit (A) Nfac Delhi Erred In Confirming Penalty Of Rs.23,20,000/- Levied Under Section 272B(2). 2) The Learned Cit (A) Nfac Delhi Erred In Sustaining The Penalty At Rs.23,20,000/- When There Was Only One Default & As Such Penalty Could At The Must Be Sustained At Rs.10,000/- Only. 3) The Learned Cit (A) Nfac Delhi Erred In Sustaining The Penalty Even Though There Was A Reasonable Cause For Assessee'S Failure To Obtain Pan Of Its Retail Customers. 4) The Penalty Levied Be Cancelled Or Reduced To Rs. 10,000/-.

For Appellant: Shri M. R. BhagwatFor Respondent: Shri Arvind Desai
Section 133ASection 139ASection 139A(5)(c)Section 272Section 272BSection 272B(2)

M/S. Manohar Dealcom Private Limited., Kolkata vs. ITO, Ward-9(1), Kolkata.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 634/KOL/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Apr 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Ble & Shri Sonjoy Sarma, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 634/Kol/2023 Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Manohar Dealcom Private Limited Income Tax Officer, Ward – C/O Nigam Centre Vs 9(1), Kolkata 155, Lenin Sarani 1St Floor, Room No. 110 Kolkata- 700013 [Pan : Aafcm8273R] अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Sunil Surana, A/R Revenue By : Shri Arun Kumar Meena, Jcit, Sr. D/R सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07/02/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 12/04/2024 आदेश/O R D E R Per Dr. Manish Borad: The Present Appeal Is Directed At The Instance Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Hereinafter The “Ld. Cit(A)”) Dt. 29/04/2023, Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (“The Act”) For The Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:- “1. For That The Notice U/S 143(2) Of The Act Was Issued By The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(2), Kolkata Who Had No Jurisdiction Over The Case Of The Assessee & As Such The Assessment Is Bad In Law. 2. For That Ld. Cit(A) Erred In Confirming The Addition Of Rs. 3.86 Crore Made By The Ao U/S 69 In Respect Of Increase In Loans & Advances As Compared To Preceding Financial Year In Spite Of The Fact That The -Loans Were Duly Recorded In The Regular Books Of Account & Were Advanced Out Of Amount Received Against Sale Of Disclosed Investments.

For Appellant: Shri Sunil Surana, A/RFor Respondent: Shri Arun Kumar Meena, JCIT, Sr. D/R
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 69