Section 132 of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: ss.247, 249, 251

Section 132 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to section 247 (Search and seizure), section 249 (Reasons not to be disclosed) and section 251 (Copying, extraction, retention and release of books of account and documents seized or requisitioned) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 247 of the 2025 ActRead section 249 of the 2025 ActRead section 251 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 132 is National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT (229 ITR 383), cited in 5,834 of the 14,598 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 132

National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT
229 ITR 383 · 1998 · Supreme Court
5,834
citing judgments

Appellate authorities can consider new claims and additional grounds if the relevant facts are already on record. The purpose of assessment is to correctly determine tax liability, allowing both parties to raise issues.

CIT v. Kabul Chawla
380 ITR 573 · 2016 · High Court
3,235
citing judgments

In a search assessment under Section 153A, additions can only be made for completed or non-abated assessment years if incriminating material relevant to those years is found during the search, although notice under Section 153A(1) is mandatorily issued for six assessment years preceding the search.

CIT v. Vegetable Products Ltd.
88 ITR 192 · 1973 · Supreme Court
2,664
citing judgments

When two equally plausible interpretations of a taxing provision are possible, or when conflicting views exist from non-jurisdictional High Courts, the interpretation that favors the assessee must be adopted.

Pr. CIT v. Abhisar Buildwell (P.) Ltd.
149 Taxmann.com 399 · 2023 · Supreme Court
2,379
citing judgments

An assessment under section 153A is without jurisdiction if there is an absence of incriminating material for an unabated assessment year.

CIT v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd.
374 ITR 645 · 2015 · High Court
1,823
citing judgments

In Section 153A proceedings, the scope of assessment extends to abated proceedings, enabling an assessee to raise fresh legal claims that could have been made in regular assessment proceedings.

CIT v. Sinhgad Technical Education Society
397 ITR 344 · 2017 · Supreme Court
1,589
citing judgments

For assessments under Section 153C, a notice is legally unsustainable if there is no incriminating material correlated to the specific assessment years for which reassessment is sought.

CIT v. Simit P. Sheth
356 ITR 451 · 2013 · High Court
1,465
citing judgments

Additions for alleged bogus purchases should be restricted to the profit element, not the entire turnover. The profit element is often estimated at 12.5% of the purported bogus purchases.

Jute Corporation of India Ltd. v. CIT
187 ITR 688 · 1991 · Supreme Court
1,372
citing judgments

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) possesses co-terminus powers with the Assessing Officer and can direct the Assessing Officer to perform actions he failed to do, but cannot introduce a new source of income in the assessment. The appellate assessment must be confined to the items of income that were the subject matter of the original assessment.

Andaman Timber Industries v. CCE
281 CTR 241 · 2015 · Supreme Court
1,335
citing judgments

An assessee must be given an opportunity to cross-examine third parties whose statements are relied upon for adverse findings. Failure to provide this opportunity is a serious flaw rendering the order a nullity.

Pr. CIT v. Meeta Gutgutia
395 ITR 526 · 2017 · High Court
1,226
citing judgments

In search assessments under Section 153A, additions to income are permissible only if incriminating material is found during the search; in the absence of such material, completed assessments cannot be disturbed. A statement recorded under Section 132(4) and later retracted may not, on its own, constitute sufficient incriminating evidence for making additions.

Judgments on Section 132

Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central Circle vs. Aryan Arcade Limited, Rajkot

ITA 229/RJT/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Rajkot19 Dec 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआ. (खो और ज).सं./It(Ss)A Nos.14/Rjt/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ष /Assessment Year: (2014-15) Deputy Commissioner Of Income बनाम Shri Gopal Bhupendra Chudasama, Tax, Central Circle-1, “Amruta /Vs. Shop 10, Om Shivalik, 8 Chandan Estate", 2Nd Floor, M.G. Road, Park, Nr. Paradise Hall, Rajkot-360 Rajkot-360 001 005 (Gujarat) स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Ablpc 5612 L (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) आ. (खो और ज). सं./It(Ss)A Nos.63 To 65/Rjt/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Years: (2016-17 To 2018-19) M/S Aryan Arcade Ltd. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, “Amruta | बनाम Estate", 2Nd Floor, M.G. Road, /Vs. Rajkot-360 001 Iscon Mega Mall, Basement, Nana Mauva, Main Road, Of 150 Ft, Ring Road, Opp. Nehru Nagar Society, Rajkot-360 009 (Guj) स्थायी लेखा सं./जी आइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aafca 0162 P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.229/Rjt/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ष/Assessment Year: (2019-20) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-1, “Amruta | बनाम M/S Aryan Arcade Ltd. Estate", 2Nd Floor, M.G. Road, /Vs. Iscon Mega Mall, Basement, Nana Rajkot-360001 Mauva, Main Road, Of 150 Ft, Ring Road, Opp. Nehru Nagar Society, Rajkot-360 009(Guj) स्थायी लेखासं./जी आइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aafca 0162 P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) निर्धारिती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri Maneesh Upnejja, Ld. Ar & Shri Baldev Raj, Ld. Ar राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By :Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 25/09/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 19/12/2025 It(Ss)A Nos. 14/Rjt/2024, 63-65/Rjt/2023 & Ita No.229/Rjt/2023, Ays 14-15, 16-17 To 19-20 Gopal B Chudasama & Aryan Arcade Ltd. आदेश/Order Per Bench: This Is Bunch Of Five Appeals By The Revenue, Pertaining To Separate

For Appellant: Shri Maneesh Upnejja, Ld. AR &For Respondent: Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. CIT-DR
Section 143(3)