Section 13(8) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: ss.332–355

Section 13(8) falls under section 13 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to sections 332 to 355 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, the provisions on registered non-profit organisations.

Read the 2025 provisions

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 13(8) is CIT v. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (264 ITR 110), cited in 398 of the 288 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 13(8)

CIT v. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection
264 ITR 110 · 2003 · High Court
398
citing judgments

Depreciation is allowable on assets for which the cost has been fully allowed as an application of income under Section 11 in previous years, when computing the income of a charitable trust. Charitable trusts are also entitled to carry forward their deficit.

ACIT v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority
143 Taxmann.com 278 · 2022 · Supreme Court
390
citing judgments

If activities for the advancement of general public utility are carried on as a business, income from such activities is not exempt under Section 11, even if the profits are utilized for the main charitable object. The argument that profits from general public utility activities can be ploughed back to charity to maintain exemption is not a good law.

Addl. CIT v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association
121 ITR 1 · 1980 · Supreme Court
328
citing judgments

A charitable institution, whose predominant object is general public utility, can engage in non-charitable activities yielding incidental profits, provided these profits are deployed to achieve the dominant charitable object. A subsidiary object, if ancillary to the primary charitable purpose, does not negate the institution's charitable character.

Income Tax v. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (IBPS)
131 Taxmann 386 · 2003 · High Court
188
citing judgments

The Income Tax Act, 1961, does not permit the carry forward of excess expenditure of a charitable trust to be set off against future surpluses, as such trusts are governed by a self-contained code under Sections 11 to 13, not the head 'Profits and Gains of Business'. However, depreciation on fixed assets is allowable to a charitable institution registered under section 12A.

India Trade Promotion Organization v. DGIT(Exemption)
371 ITR 333 · 2015 · High Court
128
citing judgments

An institution engaged in the advancement of general public utility retains its charitable character and eligibility for exemptions under Section 11 or approval under Section 10(23C)(iv) provided profit is not its predominant motive, even if it generates incidental surpluses or collects fees.

Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority v. ACIT
396 ITR 323 · 2017 · High Court
108
citing judgments

Development authorities can continue to be regarded as existing for a 'Charitable Purpose' under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, even after the introduction of the proviso to that section. The contention that such authorities automatically lose their charitable status due to the proviso is incorrect.

CIT v. Gujarat Maritime Board
295 ITR 561 · 2007 · Supreme Court
98
citing judgments

A statutory corporation undertaking activities that generate income qualifies as a charitable entity under Section 2(15) if its dominant object is general public utility and it is legally obligated to apply its income solely for that purpose, even if the activities appear to be in the nature of trade or business. Such an entity is entitled to registration under Section 12A and exemptions under Section 11.

Pradeep Kumar Biswas v. Indian Institute of Chemical Biology
5 SCC 111 · 2002 · Reported
93
citing judgments

The legal form or ostensible autonomy of an entity does not prevent it from being classified as 'State' or 'authority' under Article 12 if it functions as an instrumentality of the Government, thereby attracting constitutional accountability under Part III.

CIT v. Ahmedabad Rana Caste Association
140 ITR 1 · 1983 · Supreme Court
82
citing judgments

An object beneficial to a section of the public, as distinguished from an individual or group of individuals, qualifies as an object of general public utility under Section 2(15) and hence a charitable purpose. This applies even if the benefits are restricted to a specific caste, community, or professional group.

Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) v. DGIT (Exemptions)
358 ITR 91 · 2013 · High Court
80
citing judgments

An institution carrying out charitable objects, such as education or advancement of general public utility, does not lose its Section 11 exemption merely by collecting fees for activities like campus placements or educational guidance, as this does not constitute carrying on a business.

Judgments on Section 13(8)

Avvai Village Welfare Society, Nagapattinam vs. ITO, Trichy

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 9/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 09/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 M/S. Avvai Village Welfare Society, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 260, Public Office Road, Velipalayam, Exemptions Ward, Nagapattinam – 611 001. Thiruchirapalli. [Pan: Aaata3067H] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 36/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. Avvai Village Welfare Society, Vs. Exemptions Ward, 260, Public Office Road, Velipalayam, Thiruchirapalli. Nagapattinam – 611 001. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Shri S. Senthamarai Kannan, Advocate अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Assessee By : ""थ" की ओर से/ Department By : Mrs. Ruby George, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 16.08.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.10.2018 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: Both The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee As Well As Revenue Are Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 2, Tiruchirappalli Dated 04.11.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Assessee Has Raised Two Effective Grounds Viz., (I) The 2

For Respondent: Mrs. Ruby George, CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)

ITO, Trichy vs. Avvai Village Welfare Society, Nagapattinam

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 36/CHNY/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Oct 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Abraham P. George & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 09/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 M/S. Avvai Village Welfare Society, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 260, Public Office Road, Velipalayam, Exemptions Ward, Nagapattinam – 611 001. Thiruchirapalli. [Pan: Aaata3067H] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 36/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 The Income Tax Officer, M/S. Avvai Village Welfare Society, Vs. Exemptions Ward, 260, Public Office Road, Velipalayam, Thiruchirapalli. Nagapattinam – 611 001. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Shri S. Senthamarai Kannan, Advocate अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Assessee By : ""थ" की ओर से/ Department By : Mrs. Ruby George, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 16.08.2018 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08.10.2018 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: Both The Cross Appeals Filed By The Assessee As Well As Revenue Are Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 2, Tiruchirappalli Dated 04.11.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. The Assessee Has Raised Two Effective Grounds Viz., (I) The 2

For Respondent: Mrs. Ruby George, CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)