Section 13(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: ss.332–355

Section 13(2)(b) falls under section 13 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to sections 332 to 355 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, the provisions on registered non-profit organisations.

Read the 2025 provisions

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 13(2)(b) is Sudhir Kumar Shah (HUF) v. CIT-III, Ludhiana) (224 Taxmann 178), cited in 38 of the 38 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 13(2)(b)

Sudhir Kumar Shah (HUF) v. CIT-III, Ludhiana)
224 Taxmann 178 · 2014 · High Court
38
citing judgments

The addition of cash deposits to an assessee's income is justified under Section 68 if the assessee fails to explain the nature and source of these deposits. The onus is on the assessee to provide such an explanation.

Sudhir Kumar Shah (HUF) v. CIT-III, Ludhiana)
239 Taxmann 264 · 2016 · Supreme Court
36
citing judgments

Unexplained cash deposits in a bank account can be added to income under Section 68, even if the assessee does not maintain formal books of account, and a passbook can be considered a book of account.

Agappa Child Centre v. CIT
226 ITR 211 · 1997 · High Court
33
citing judgments

For the purposes of Section 13(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, the term 'benefit' extends beyond pecuniary advantages to include any intangible and indirect benefit.

DIT (Exemption) v. Girdharilal Shewnarain Tantia Trust
199 ITR 215 · 1993 · High Court
24
citing judgments

The real income of a trust, not deemed income, is to be considered for accumulation. Deductions allowable in a normal commercial manner should be applied before determining the income to be excluded.

Trib.) 9. DCIT v. Sushil Kumar Jain
15 ITD 1 · 1986 · ITAT
10
citing judgments

Rent received from specified concerns is considered adequate if it is legally sufficient and reasonably so, not necessarily what is determined as market value by another party, unless the price is unconscionable.

8 Commissioner of Gift-Tax v. Indo Traders and Agencies (P.) Ltd.
131 ITR 313 · 1981 · High Court
4
citing judgments
Banerjee v. CIT
9 ITR 137 · 1941 · Reported
3
citing judgments
Page 14 of 24 20.2.1. In Reva Investment Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Gift Tax, Gujarat II
9 SCC 111 · 2001 · Reported
3
citing judgments

Judgments on Section 13(2)(b)