Section 12A of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: ss.332–355

Section 12A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 corresponds to sections 332 to 355 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, the provisions on registered non-profit organisations.

Read the 2025 provisions

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 12A is CIT v. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection (264 ITR 110), cited in 398 of the 6,064 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 12A

CIT v. Institute of Banking Personnel Selection
264 ITR 110 · 2003 · High Court
398
citing judgments

Depreciation is allowable on assets for which the cost has been fully allowed as an application of income under Section 11 in previous years, when computing the income of a charitable trust. Charitable trusts are also entitled to carry forward their deficit.

ACIT v. Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority
143 Taxmann.com 278 · 2022 · Supreme Court
390
citing judgments

If activities for the advancement of general public utility are carried on as a business, income from such activities is not exempt under Section 11, even if the profits are utilized for the main charitable object. The argument that profits from general public utility activities can be ploughed back to charity to maintain exemption is not a good law.

Addl. CIT v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association
121 ITR 1 · 1980 · Supreme Court
328
citing judgments

A charitable institution, whose predominant object is general public utility, can engage in non-charitable activities yielding incidental profits, provided these profits are deployed to achieve the dominant charitable object. A subsidiary object, if ancillary to the primary charitable purpose, does not negate the institution's charitable character.

Sole Trustee, Loka Shikshana Trust v. CIT
101 ITR 234 · 1975 · Supreme Court
323
citing judgments

This case defines 'education' under Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act as systematic instruction, schooling, or training given to the young for preparation for the work of life. It clarifies that 'education' in this context has a narrow meaning, not extending to every acquisition of further knowledge.

Exide Industries Ltd. v. Union of India
292 ITR 470 · 2007 · High Court
320
citing judgments

The Calcutta High Court held that restricting deduction for leave encashment via Section 43B(f) was arbitrary and contrary to Supreme Court decisions. However, this judgment was later stayed by the Supreme Court.

Escorts Ltd. v. UOI
199 ITR 43 · 1993 · Supreme Court
267
citing judgments

A statute should not be construed to permit double deduction for the same expenditure unless specifically provided by law.

1. AIR 1951 SC 467: HARLA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN. 2
2 SCC 453 · 1997 · Reported
222
citing judgments

When an appeal or revision is filed against an order passed by a subordinate forum, and a superior forum modifies, reverses, or affirms that decision, the order of the subordinate forum merges into the superior forum's decision, which then becomes the sole operative and enforceable order.

CIT v. Shri Plot Swetamber Murti Pujak Jain Mandal
211 ITR 293 · 1995 · High Court
204
citing judgments

A charitable trust can carry forward its excess expenditure from previous years and adjust it against the income of subsequent years, which qualifies as an application of income under Section 11. Additionally, voluntary contributions received for a specific purpose are treated as corpus funds and are not taxable.

CIT v. Gujarat Oil & Allied Industries
201 ITR 325 · 1993 · High Court
195
citing judgments

The requirement to file an audit report along with the income tax return, as specified in provisions like Section 80J(6A) or 80-IA(7), is directory and not mandatory. Substantial compliance is achieved if the audit report is submitted at any time before the assessment is framed or completed, and benefits should not be denied merely due to a delay in furnishing it.

CIT v. Society of the Sisters of St. Anne
146 ITR 28 · 1984 · High Court
195
citing judgments

Depreciation claimed by a charitable trust on its assets is an allowable application of income for computing exemption under Section 11, and this does not constitute a double deduction.

Judgments on Section 12A

M/S. Master Jaswant Singh Educational Society, Ludhiana vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 575/ASR/2018[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Jun 2020AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri L.P. Sahu, Am & Shri Ravish Sood, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.575/Asr/2018 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2017-2018) िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष" M/S Master Jaswant Singh Vs. Cit(E), Chandigarh Educational Society, Village Balala, Tehsil: Samrala, Dist : Ludhiana (Punjab) "थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aagam 0541 H .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (" यथ" / Respondent) : Shri Sudhir Sehgal, Advocate िनधा"!रती क" क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By : Shri M.P.Singh, Cit-Dr राज"व क" क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सुनवाई क" तार'ख / Date Of Hearing : 06/02/2020 घोषणा क" तार'ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30/06/2020 आदेश आदेश / O R D E R आदेश आदेश Per L.P.Sahu, Am: This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(E), Chandigarh, Dated 26.03.2018. 2. As Per The Office Note, There Is A Delay Of 175 Days In Filing The Appeal. In This Regard, Ld. Ar Of The Assessee Has Filed An Application Dated 23.11.2018 Along With Affidavit For Condonation Of Delay, Copies Of Which Are Placed On Record. Ld. Dr Has Also Not Objected To Condone The Delay In Filing The Appeal By The Assessee. Considering The Application Of The Assessee, Wherein The Assessee Has Stated Sufficient Reason For Condonation Of Delay, We Condone The Delay Of 175 Days In Filing The Present Appeal By The Assessee & Appeal Is Heard Finally.

For Respondent: Shri M.P.Singh, CIT-DR
Section 12A

Sumitra Devi Arya Sr.Sec.School, Dinanagar vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 546/ASR/2018[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar30 Jun 2020AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri L.P. Sahu, Am & Shri Ravish Sood, Jm आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.546/Asr/2018 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :2018-2019) वष" Sumitra Devi Arya Sr. Secondary Vs. Cit(E), Chandigarh School, G.T.Road, Dinanagar, Punjab "थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aahas 4715 J .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (" यथ" / Respondent) : Shri Ashwani Kalia, Ca िनधा"!रती क" क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By : Shri M.P.Singh, Cit-Dr राज"व क" क" क" ओर क" ओर ओर : 06/02/2020 सुनवाई क" तार'ख / Date Of Hearing घोषणा क" तार'ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30/06/2020 आदेश आदेश / O R D E R आदेश आदेश Per L.P.Sahu, Am: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(E), Chandigarh, Dated 31.08.2018. 2. Though The Assessee Has Raised As Many As Nine Grounds Of Appeal, However, The Sole & Substantive Issue Involved In The Present Appeal Of The Assessee Is With Regard To Rejection Of Application Of Assessee For Grant Of Registration U/S.12A Of The Act By The Cit(E). 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed An Application In Form No.10A Before The Cit(E) Seeking Registration U/S.12A Of The Act, 1961. However, The Cit(E) Rejected The Application Of The Assessee Observing That The Assessee Society Does Not Fulfill The Conditions Laid Down For Grant Of Registration U/S.12A Of The Act.

For Respondent: Shri M.P.Singh, CIT-DR
Section 12A

Krishiv Rama Foundation, Jammu vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chandigarh

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 648/ASR/2019[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Amritsar29 Jun 2020AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri L.P. Sahu, Am & Shri Ravish Sood, Jm आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.648/Asr/2019 आयकर अपील सं आयकर अपील सं (िनधा"रण िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष" वष" / Assessment Year :Na) वष" Krishiv Rama Foundation, Vs. Cit(E), Chandigarh House No.83, Ward No.1, R.S.Pura, Jammu-181102 "थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aadtk 8135 H .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (" यथ" / Respondent) िनधा"!रती क" क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Assessee By : Shri P.N.Arora, Advocate क" क" ओर ओर राज"व क" क" ओर ओर सेसेसेसे /Revenue By : Shri M.P.Singh, Cit-Dr क" क" ओर ओर सुनवाई क" तार'ख / Date Of Hearing : 06/02/2020 घोषणा क" तार'ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30/06/2020 आदेश आदेश / O R D E R आदेश आदेश Per L.P.Sahu, Am: The Assessee Has Filed This Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(E), Chandigarh, Dated 25.09.2019. 2. The Sole Issue Involved In The Present Appeal Of The Assessee Is With Regard To Rejection Of Application Of Assessee For Grant Of Registration U/S.12A Of The Act By The Cit(E). 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed Application Electronically In Form No.10A The Act On 10.03.2019 Seeking Registration U/S.12A Of The Act, 1961. However, The Cit(E) Rejected The Application Of The Assessee Holding That The Assessee Trust Does Not Exist For The Purpose Of Charity, Rather It Is Working Commercially, Which Is Defeating Its Own Aims & Objectives.

For Appellant: Shri P.N.Arora, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri M.P.Singh, CIT-DR
Section 12A