28 judgments on BharatTax turn on Section 11B.
Bench: Shri R. K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandra
Bench: SHRI RAHUL CHAUDHARY, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL (Accountant Member)
Bench: This Court Is Whether The Separate Notice Under Section 11A Of The Central Excise Act Is Necessary For The Recovery Of The Amount When An Erroneous Refund Is Granted Through The Speaking Order Is Reviewed Under Section 35E Of The Act? 2.1 The Facts Leading To The Present Appeal In Nutshell Are As Under: 2.2 The Respondent Herein Was At The Relevant Time A Manufacturer Of Cotton Yarn Which It Consumed Captively In Its Composite Mills For Weaving Of Fabric. In October, 1980 Vide Judgment In The Case Of M/S. J.K. Cotton 2
Bench: ARAVIND KUMAR,E.S.INDIRESH
Appeal stands allowed in terms of the above
Bench: S.SUJATHA,N.K.SUDHINDRARAO
Bench: MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI,MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI
Bench: A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN
The appeal is allowed in the above terms
Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR
Showing 1–20 of 28 · Page 1 of 2