Section 115JA of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 115JA is ACG Associated Capsules (P) Ltd. v. CIT (343 ITR 89), cited in 144 of the 209 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 115JA

ACG Associated Capsules (P) Ltd. v. CIT
343 ITR 89 · 2012 · Supreme Court
144
citing judgments

For calculation of deduction under Section 80HHC, if total interest is netted off after adjusting interest paid and received, the 90% reduction specified in Explanation (baa) is not applicable.

Topman Exports v. CIT
342 ITR 49 · 2012 · Supreme Court
121
citing judgments

Export incentives, such as DEPB (Duty Entitlement Pass Book) and advance license benefits, constitute income taxable on an accrual basis under Section 28 of the Income-tax Act. Profit arising on the transfer of DEPB is not eligible for deduction under Section 80HHC.

CIT v. HCL Comnet Systems & Services Ltd.
305 ITR 409 · 2008 · Supreme Court
118
citing judgments

For computing book profits under Section 115JB, an Assessing Officer's power is limited to examining duly certified books and making adjustments only as per the Explanation. A provision for bad and doubtful debts, being a diminution in the value of an asset (receivable), does not constitute a 'provision for liability' under Clause (c) of the Explanation and therefore cannot be added back.

CIT v. Veekay Lal Investments Co. Pvt. Ltd.
249 ITR 597 · 2001 · High Court
99
citing judgments

Book profits under Section 115JB must include income by way of capital gains, similar to how total income is calculated under Section 45.

ACIT v. Sh. Ramesh Kumar Mantri
64 Taxmann.com 34 · 2015 · Supreme Court
77
citing judgments

Leave to appeal was granted by the Supreme Court in this case. The case concerns reassessment proceedings following a search.

Commissioner of Income Tax, Madras v. Ponni Sugars and Chemicals Ltd.
9 SCC 337 · 2008 · Reported
48
citing judgments

The classification of a government subsidy as either a revenue or capital receipt depends on its object and purpose. If the subsidy is given to enable the assessee to set up a new unit or expand an existing one, it is a capital receipt; if it is to meet recurring expenses, it is a revenue receipt.

JCIT v. Rolta India Ltd.
330 ITR 470 · 2011 · Supreme Court
44
citing judgments

Interest under sections 234B and 234C is leviable for failure to pay advance tax, even when the income tax is ultimately computed under Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) provisions, specifically sections 115JA or 115JB. This ruling clarified the law, overturning previous interpretations.

LAWS(DLH) 2015 4 47: AJANTA MERCHANTS PVT. LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT
3 SCC 151 · 1989 · Reported
39
citing judgments

Courts cannot substitute their own views for those of the Directorate of Enforcement when assessing whether actions were taken arbitrarily or without jurisdiction. The court must consider the substance of the matter, not just the form.

18.07. 2017. 2. CIT v. Akshay Textile Trading & Agencies Pvt Ltd.
304 ITR 401 · 2008 · High Court
37
citing judgments

Exempt capital gains must be considered when computing book profits under Section 115JB. Book profits cannot be arbitrarily adjusted.

Rain Commodities Ltd. v. Dy. CIT
40 SOT 265 · 2010 · ITAT
35
citing judgments

Transfer pricing adjustments cannot be added back to book profits under section 115JB of the Income-tax Act, as they are not among the permissible adjustments listed in Explanation I to section 115JB(2). Exempt capital gains must be considered when computing book profits under section 115JB.

Judgments on Section 115JA

The DCIT Cir 3(1), Mumbai vs. M/S. Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd, Mumbai

Appeal stand partly allowed to the extent indicated in the order

ITA 7486/MUM/2007[2004-2005]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai06 Jan 2020AY 2004-2005

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.7486/Mum/2007 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2004-05) Acit-(Ltu)-1 Ambuja Cements Limited बनाम/ World Trade Centre [Earlier Known As Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd.] Elegant Business Park Centre-1, 29Th Floor, Vs. Midc Cross Road “B”, Off Andheri-Kurla Road Cuffe Parade, Mumbai-05. Andheri (E), Mumbai-400 059. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacg-0569-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : & आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.7494/Mum/2007 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2004-05) Ambuja Cements Limited Dcit–Range-3(1) [Earlier Known As Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd] बनाम/ Aaykar Bhavan, M.K. Road Elegant Business Park Mumbai-400 020. Vs. Midc Cross Road “B”, Off Andheri-Kurla Road Andheri (E), Mumbai-400 059. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacg 0569 P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) : & C.O. No.222/Mum/2017 [Arising Out Of Ita No. 7494/Mum/2007] (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2004-05) Acit-(Ltu)-1 Ambuja Cements Limited बनाम/ [Earlier Known As Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd.] World Trade Centre Elegant Business Park Centre-1, 29Th Floor, Vs. Midc Cross Road “B”, Off Andheri-Kurla Road Cuffe Parade, Mumbai-05. Andheri (E), Mumbai-400 059. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacg-0569-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ" / Respondent) :

For Appellant: S/Shri Yogesh Thar, Hardik Nirmal &For Respondent: Shri Anadi Varma-Ld.CIT-DR & Shri
Section 115JSection 143(3)

M/S.Kamdar Private Limited, Mumbai vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 1(2), Mumbai

In the result appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 6589/MUM/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai03 Jun 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Amarjit Singhआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.6589/Mum/2017 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2006-07) बिाम/ M/S. Kamdar Private Ltd., Dcit 1(2), Ground Floor, Industrial 5Th Floor, Ayakar Assurance Building, J Tata Bhavan, Mumbai V. Road, Churchgate, Mumbai 400020 400020 स्थायी ऱेखा सं./ Pan: Aaack3308G (अपीऱाथी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri. J.P Vairagi Revenue By: Shri. Manoj Kumar Singh (Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख /Date Of Hearing : 27.03.2019 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 03.06.2019 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shamim Yahya: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against Order Of Learned Cit-A Dated 21.09.2017 & Pertains To Assessment Year 2006-07. 2. The Grounds For Appeal Is That The Learned Cit-A Erred In Sustaining The Penalty Of Rs. 7,83,991/- Under Section 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act. 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Leading To The Levy Of Penalty Are That Penalty Was Levied On Two Counts. One Issue Was The Claim Of Deprecation On The Premises Which Was Let Out. Assessee’S Submission

For Appellant: Shri. J.P VairagiFor Respondent: Shri. Manoj Kumar Singh (DR)
Section 115Section 115JSection 271(1)(c)