Section 11(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: ss.332–355

Section 11(1)(c) falls under section 11 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to sections 332 to 355 of the Income-tax Act, 2025, the provisions on registered non-profit organisations.

Read the 2025 provisions

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 11(1)(c) is CIT v. Shri Plot Swetamber Murti Pujak Jain Mandal (211 ITR 293), cited in 204 of the 66 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 11(1)(c)

CIT v. Shri Plot Swetamber Murti Pujak Jain Mandal
211 ITR 293 · 1995 · High Court
204
citing judgments

A charitable trust can carry forward its excess expenditure from previous years and adjust it against the income of subsequent years, which qualifies as an application of income under Section 11. Additionally, voluntary contributions received for a specific purpose are treated as corpus funds and are not taxable.

CIT v. Maharana of Mewar Charitable Foundation
164 ITR 439 · 1987 · High Court
153
citing judgments

For charitable trusts, the set-off of excess expenditure from prior years against the income of a subsequent year is considered an application of income for charitable purposes. Similarly, the repayment of loans borrowed for legitimate charitable activities is also treated as an application of income.

CIT v. Matriseva Trust
242 ITR 20 · 2000 · High Court
91
citing judgments

An excess of expenditure incurred by a charitable trust in previous years can be adjusted against the income of a subsequent year, and this adjustment is considered an application of income for charitable purposes under Section 11.

Govindu Naicker Estate v. ADIT
248 ITR 368 · 2001 · High Court
89
citing judgments

A charitable trust may adjust expenditure incurred for religious or charitable purposes in an earlier year against the income of a subsequent year, which is considered an application of income for the subsequent year under Section 11. This principle is guided by commercial considerations and the benevolent intent of Section 11.

CIT v. National Association of Software & Services Companies
345 ITR 362 · 2012 · High Court
40
citing judgments

A one-time fee paid by members, with the understanding that it can only be used for capital purposes, is considered a corpus donation and is not taxable as income. This is especially true when separate fees are collected for services rendered.

CIT v. Calcutta Stock Exchange Association Ltd.
36 ITR 222 · 1959 · Supreme Court
37
citing judgments

Receipts derived from services rendered by an association to its members, which fall outside the scope of its primary mutual purpose, can be charged to income tax. Such services might otherwise be considered business income, but taxability depends on whether the assessee is brought within the specific terms of the relevant tax provision.

DIT v. Raghuvanshi Charitable Trust
197 Taxmann 170 · 2011 · High Court
32
citing judgments

A trust can carry forward a deficit from the current year and set it off against the income of a subsequent year, which is considered an application of income for charitable purposes within the meaning of Section 11(1)(a).

Deputy Director of Income-tax v. Jyothy Charitable Trust
60 Taxmann.com 165 · 2015 · ITAT
20
citing judgments

Income arising to a charitable trust need not be applied in the year it arises; application in subsequent years is permissible under Section 11(1)(a).

Govindu Naicker Estate v. Asstt. DIT
105 Taxmann 719 · 1999 · High Court
12
citing judgments
Jamsetji Tata Trust v. Joint Director of Income-tax (Exemption) Range-II
44 Taxmann.com 447 · 2014 · ITAT
11
citing judgments

Granting scholarships to Indian students for education abroad, where the funds are released in India, constitutes application of income for charitable purposes in India. The application of income is completed when the grant is released.

Judgments on Section 11(1)(c)

M/S. Indian Institute of Engg. Technology, Chennai vs. DDIT, Chennai

ITA 2092/CHNY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 Oct 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 2092/Chny/2016 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2011-12 M/S. Indian Institute Of Engineering The Deputy Commissioner Of Technology, No. 363, Arcot Road, Vs. Income Tax (Exemption)-Iii, Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024. Chennai 600 034. [Pan:Aaatt2768C] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G. Johnson, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 02.09.2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 05.10.2021 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 17, Chennai, Dated 30.03.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2011-12. Vide Common Order In M.P. Nos. 219 & 220/Chny/2018 In I.T.A. Nos. 2092 & 2093/Chny/2016 Dated 28.06.2019, The Order Passed By The Tribunal In I.T.A. No. 2092/Chny/2016 Dated 22.06.2018 For The Assessment 2011-12 Alone Has Been Recalled For Limited Purpose & Relevant Portion Of The Order Is Extracted As Under: “6. For Ay 2011-12, The Exemption U/S.11 Was Denied Only For The Reason Or Issue That Honorarium Was Paid. This Issue Was Decided In Favour Of The Assessee By The Itat In The Earlier Year & By Following That Order This Issue Was Allowed In This Year As Well In Favour Of The Assessee. The Ao Did Not 2

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G. Johnson, Addl. CIT
Section 11Section 11(1)(c)Section 11(5)Section 2(15)