Section 10A of the Income Tax Act

The decision most relied on for Section 10A is CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. (349 ITR 98), cited in 818 of the 2,147 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 10A

CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd.
349 ITR 98 · 2012 · High Court
818
citing judgments

When computing deduction under Section 10A, if communication or telecommunication expenses are excluded from export turnover, they must also be excluded from total turnover to maintain consistency and apply the ordinary meaning of 'turnover' in context.

CIT v. Yokogawa India Ltd.
391 ITR 274 · 2017 · Supreme Court
290
citing judgments

Deduction under Section 10A or 10AA of the Income-tax Act is computed on the profits of the eligible unit without first setting off losses from other units or non-eligible units. Conversely, losses incurred by an eligible unit are allowed to be set off against the assessee's other taxable business profits.

CIT v. Taikisha Engineering India Ltd.
370 ITR 338 · 2015 · High Court
252
citing judgments

The disallowance under Section 14A of the Income-tax Act, read with Rule 8D, cannot exceed the actual exempt income earned by the assessee in the relevant previous year. If no exempt income is earned, no disallowance under Section 14A can be made.

III v. HCL Technologies Ltd.
93 Taxmann.com 33 · 2018 · Supreme Court
245
citing judgments

When computing the deduction available under Section 10A of the Income-tax Act, communication expenses must be excluded from the total turnover for the purpose of calculating the eligible relief.

CIT v. Gem Plus Jewellery India Ltd.
330 ITR 175 · 2011 · High Court
207
citing judgments

Disallowances made under various sections, such as for PF/ESIC contributions, result in an increase in business profits, and these enhanced profits are eligible for deduction under Sections 10A and 10AA. Similarly, gains from foreign exchange fluctuations directly linked to export sales are also eligible for deduction under Section 10A.

Rampgreen Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT
377 ITR 533 · 2015 · High Court
196
citing judgments

Knowledge Process Outsourcing (KPO) service providers are functionally dissimilar to Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) or Information Technology Enabled Services (ITeS) providers and cannot be compared for transfer pricing purposes, even under the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM). Further, companies with significantly different business models, such as those with extensive subcontracting, should be excluded as comparables.

ITO v. TechSpan India (P) Ltd.
92 Taxmann.com 361 · 2018 · Supreme Court
194
citing judgments

Reassessment under Section 147/148 is invalid if it constitutes a mere change of opinion by the Assessing Officer without any fresh tangible material, especially after the assessee made a full and truthful disclosure during the original scrutiny assessment under Section 143(3).

CIT v. HCL Technologies Ltd.
404 ITR 719 · 2018 · Supreme Court
174
citing judgments

When calculating deductions under sections like 10A or 10AA, any expenses or items reduced from 'export turnover' in the numerator must also be reduced from 'total turnover' in the denominator to ensure consistent application of the deduction formula.

CIT v. S.K. Tekriwal
361 ITR 432 · 2014 · High Court
150
citing judgments

Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act does not apply to disallow expenses when there is a short deduction of tax at source. This includes situations where TDS is deducted at a lower rate than required or under an incorrect section.

Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT
194 Taxmann 203 · 2010 · High Court
144
citing judgments

Section 14A(2) and (3) read with Rule 8D are constitutionally valid. Rule 8D applies prospectively from Assessment Year 2008-09, and for prior assessment years, the Assessing Officer must determine the expenditure related to exempt income under Section 14A(1) using a reasonable basis.

Judgments on Section 10A

Classic Linens International Pvt. Ltd., Chennai vs. ACIT (OSD), Company Range-I, Chennai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 3341/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Nov 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.3341/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Classic Linens International Pvt. The Assistant Commissioner Of Ltd., Unit 13 & 14, Sdf, Ii Phase Vs. Income Tax, Osd, Company Range-I, Mepz, Tambaram, Chennai 600 045. Nungambakkam High Road, Chennai 600 034. [Pan: Aabcc3510F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Raghunathan & Shri S. Sankar Narayanan, Advocates ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G. Johnson, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 09.11.2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 23.11.2021 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 4, Chennai, Dated 30.09.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2014-15. The Effective Ground Raised In The Appeal Of The Assessee Relates To Confirmation Of Disallowance Of Deduction Of ₹.52,61,428/- Claimed Under Section 10Aa Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short].

For Appellant: Shri S. Raghunathan &For Respondent: Shri G. Johnson, Addl. CIT
Section 10ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)

Tcs-E-Serve Ltd ( Earlier Known As E-Sereve Internaiontal Ltd), Mumbai vs. DCIT RG 9(1), Mumbai

Appeal stand dismissed since the only issue in revenue’s appeal is deduction u/s 10A

ITA 5089/MUM/2010[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai15 Nov 2021AY 2003-04

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Saktijit Dey, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) 1. आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.5089/Mum/2010 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 2. आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.5090/Mum/2010 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2004-05) Tata Consultancy Services Limited Dcit- 9(1) / 9(3) (Upon Merger Of Tcs E-Serve Ltd Aaykar Bhawan बिाम With Tata Consultancy Services Ltd) M.K.Road / Vs. 9Th Floor, Nirmal Building Mumbai-400 020 Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacc-4480-F (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : & 3. आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.4928/Mum/2010 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 4. आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.4929/Mum/2010 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2004-05) & 5. आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.5478/Mum/2014 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & 6. आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.7446/Mum/2010 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2003-04) & 7. आयकरअपील सं./ I.T.A. No.7447/Mum/2010 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2004-05) Acit, Range-9(3) / Circle-9(3) Tata Consultancy Services Limited Aaykar Bhawan, M.K.Road (Upon Merger Of Tcs E-Serve Ltd बिाम Mumbai-400 020 With Tata Consultancy Services Ltd) / Vs. 9Th Floor, Nirmal Building Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacc-4480-F (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) :

For Appellant: Shri P.J. Pardiwalla-Ld. Sr.CounselFor Respondent: Shri Vinay Sinha – Ld. CIT-DR & Shri
Section 10ASection 143(3)Section 234DSection 271(1)(c)Section 80H

M/S. I-Flex Solutions Ltd, Mumbai vs. The ACIT Cir 8(2), Mumbai

In the result, appeal is dismissed

ITA 5023/MUM/2007[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Oct 2021AY 2003-2004

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2003-04 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax- M/S Oracle Financial Services 8(2), Software Ltd. Room No. 209/216A, 2Nd Floor, (Formerly Known As M/S I-Flex Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Vs. Solutions Ltd.), Mumbai - 400020 1,Oracle Park, Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon (E), Mumbai - 400063 Pan: Aaacc1448B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2003-04 M/S Oracle Financial Services Assistant Commissioner Of Software Ltd. Income Tax, (Formerly Known As I-Flex Range- 8(2), Solutions Ltd.), Vs. Mumbai Oracle Park, Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon (East), Mumbai - 400063 Pan: Aaacc1448B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2004-05 M/S Oracle Financial Services Additional Commissioner Of Software Ltd. Income Tax, (Formerly Known As I-Flex Range- 8(2), Solutions Ltd.), Vs. Mumbai Oracle Park, Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon (East), Mumbai - 400063 Pan: Aaacc1448B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Years: 2003-04 & 2004-05 Assessment Year: 2004-05 D.C.I.T. 8(2), M/S Oracle Financial Services Room No. 216-A, Aayakar Software Ltd. Bhavan, M.K. Road, (Formerly Known As I-Flex Mumbai - 400020 Vs. Solutions Ltd.), 399, Subhash Road, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai - 400057 Pan: Aaacc1448B (Appellant) (Respondent) Revenue By : Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra (Dr)

For Appellant: S/Shri Ajit Kumar Jain/For Respondent: Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra (DR)
Section 10A

The DCIT 8(2), Mumbai vs. M/S. Iflex Solutions Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeal is dismissed

ITA 4888/MUM/2007[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Oct 2021AY 2003-2004

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri Saktijit Dey, Hon’Bleassessment Year: 2003-04 Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax- M/S Oracle Financial Services 8(2), Software Ltd. Room No. 209/216A, 2Nd Floor, (Formerly Known As M/S I-Flex Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road, Vs. Solutions Ltd.), Mumbai - 400020 1,Oracle Park, Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon (E), Mumbai - 400063 Pan: Aaacc1448B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2003-04 M/S Oracle Financial Services Assistant Commissioner Of Software Ltd. Income Tax, (Formerly Known As I-Flex Range- 8(2), Solutions Ltd.), Vs. Mumbai Oracle Park, Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon (East), Mumbai - 400063 Pan: Aaacc1448B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year: 2004-05 M/S Oracle Financial Services Additional Commissioner Of Software Ltd. Income Tax, (Formerly Known As I-Flex Range- 8(2), Solutions Ltd.), Vs. Mumbai Oracle Park, Off Western Express Highway, Goregaon (East), Mumbai - 400063 Pan: Aaacc1448B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Years: 2003-04 & 2004-05 Assessment Year: 2004-05 D.C.I.T. 8(2), M/S Oracle Financial Services Room No. 216-A, Aayakar Software Ltd. Bhavan, M.K. Road, (Formerly Known As I-Flex Mumbai - 400020 Vs. Solutions Ltd.), 399, Subhash Road, Vile Parle (East), Mumbai - 400057 Pan: Aaacc1448B (Appellant) (Respondent) Revenue By : Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra (Dr)

For Appellant: S/Shri Ajit Kumar Jain/For Respondent: Shri Sushil Kumar Mishra (DR)
Section 10A