Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.11

Section 10(23C)(vi) falls under section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 11 (Incomes not included in total income) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 11 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 10(23C)(vi) is CIT v. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona (402 ITR 441), cited in 187 of the 517 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 10(23C)(vi)

CIT v. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona
402 ITR 441 · 2018 · Supreme Court
187
citing judgments

Depreciation is allowable as a deduction even if the expenditure for acquiring the capital asset was treated as application of income for charitable purposes. This does not constitute a double benefit.

Pinegrove International Charitable Trust v. UOI
327 ITR 73 · 2010 · High Court
56
citing judgments

An educational institution qualifies for exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) if its predominant object is solely education and not to earn profit. The mere generation of a surplus or profit from imparting education does not, by itself, disentitle it from the exemption, provided the income is applied for its educational objects.

CIT v. Children’s Education Society
358 ITR 373 · 2013 · High Court
42
citing judgments

When an assessee society runs multiple educational institutions, the exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) applies to each institution individually, meaning the specified monetary limit is considered per institution and not for the aggregate annual receipts of the entire society.

Oxford Academy for Career Development v. Chief CIT
315 ITR 382 · 2009 · High Court
37
citing judgments

The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) has no power to cancel registration granted under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act retrospectively, especially when there is no express provision in the Act for such cancellation and the order is quasi-judicial in nature.

Surat City Gymkhana v. Dy.CIT
254 ITR 733 · 2002 · High Court
37
citing judgments

The burden of proof lies on the Assessing Officer (AO) to establish that a trust or charitable institution is hit by the provisions of Section 13. General allegations or mere transactions with interested persons are insufficient unless concrete benefit is proven.

CRL.A. 124/2013 & ORS. Page 344 of 400 State of Madhya Pradesh v. Sheetla Sahai and Ors.
8 SCC 47 · 2015 · Reported
35
citing judgments

Sanction for prosecution under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is required for public servants who were or are in service, distinguishing it from Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, which does not require sanction for those who have ceased to be public servants.

Tribune Trist v. CIT
390 ITR 547 · 2017 · High Court
33
citing judgments

The proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act cannot be invoked against city improvement trusts if their activities are not in the nature of trade, commerce, or business, even if they generate surplus or sell developed plots.

Aurora Educational Society v. CCIT
20 Taxmann.com 46 · 2012 · Reported
31
citing judgments

The scope and amplitude of Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and its applicable provisos, rules, and forms are the subject of examination in relation to applications for approval.

CIT v. Indian Jute Mills Association
134 ITR 68 · 1982 · High Court
30
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred includes depreciation claims. Necessary provisions required by statute, such as for gratuity and leave encashment, can be considered as applied for the objects of a trust.

New Noble Educational Society v. Chief CIT
334 ITR 303 · 2011 · High Court
22
citing judgments

In Andhra Pradesh, only societies, associations, or trusts can establish educational institutions, as individuals are prohibited from doing so under Section 20A of the AP Education Act.

Judgments on Section 10(23C)(vi)

ACIT, Circle-2(1), Sambalpur vs. M/S. Gayatri College of Pharmacy, Sambalpur

Appeal of the revenue is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 467/CTK/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack27 Jul 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.S.Saini, Am & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.467/Ctk/2015 (धनधाारण वषा / Assessment Year :2010-201) Acit, Circle-2(1), Sambalpur Vs. M/S Gayatri College Of Pharmacy, At-Jamadarpalli, Po-Ainthapalli, District-Sambalpur स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./ Pan/Gir No. : Aaatg 7115 L (अपीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Subhendu Dutta, Citdr धनधााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : None सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 25/07/2017 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement 27/07/2017 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, Jm: The Revenue Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of Cit(A)-Ii, Bhubaneswar, Passed In Appeal Reference No.0511/2013-14, Dated 18.09.2014. 2. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal :- “01. Whether In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Is Correct In Law & Facts In Giving Full Relief To The Assessee Trust Though The Activities Of The Assessee Did Not Qualify To Claim Exemption U/S.10(23C)(Vi) Of The I.T.Act. 02. Whether In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case, The Ld. Cit(A) Is Correct In Law & Facts In Giving Full Relief To The Assessee Trust Though The Accumulated Profit Is More Than 15% Of Total Income.” 3. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Is A Society Registered Under The Society Registration Act, 1860 On 9-9-1986 & Runs Educational Institution & Imparting Education Of Pharmacy At Graduation & Post Graduation Levels & Filed The Return Of Income On 13.09.2010 Declaring Total Income Of Rs.Nil & The Sources Of Income Of The Assessee Mainly From Admission Fees, Sale Of Application Form, Hostel

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Subhendu Dutta, CITDR
Section 10Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)