Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act

Income-tax Act, 2025: s.11

Section 10(23C)(vi) falls under section 10 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which corresponds to section 11 (Incomes not included in total income) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

Read section 11 of the 2025 Act

Correspondence checked against the ICAI tabular mapping of the two Acts and the BharatTax.co section commentary.

The decision most relied on for Section 10(23C)(vi) is CIT v. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona (402 ITR 441), cited in 187 of the 517 judgments on BharatTax that turn on this section.

Leading authorities on Section 10(23C)(vi)

CIT v. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona
402 ITR 441 · 2018 · Supreme Court
187
citing judgments

Depreciation is allowable as a deduction even if the expenditure for acquiring the capital asset was treated as application of income for charitable purposes. This does not constitute a double benefit.

Pinegrove International Charitable Trust v. UOI
327 ITR 73 · 2010 · High Court
56
citing judgments

An educational institution qualifies for exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) if its predominant object is solely education and not to earn profit. The mere generation of a surplus or profit from imparting education does not, by itself, disentitle it from the exemption, provided the income is applied for its educational objects.

CIT v. Children’s Education Society
358 ITR 373 · 2013 · High Court
42
citing judgments

When an assessee society runs multiple educational institutions, the exemption under Section 10(23C)(iiiad) applies to each institution individually, meaning the specified monetary limit is considered per institution and not for the aggregate annual receipts of the entire society.

Oxford Academy for Career Development v. Chief CIT
315 ITR 382 · 2009 · High Court
37
citing judgments

The Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) has no power to cancel registration granted under Section 12A of the Income Tax Act retrospectively, especially when there is no express provision in the Act for such cancellation and the order is quasi-judicial in nature.

Surat City Gymkhana v. Dy.CIT
254 ITR 733 · 2002 · High Court
37
citing judgments

The burden of proof lies on the Assessing Officer (AO) to establish that a trust or charitable institution is hit by the provisions of Section 13. General allegations or mere transactions with interested persons are insufficient unless concrete benefit is proven.

CRL.A. 124/2013 & ORS. Page 344 of 400 State of Madhya Pradesh v. Sheetla Sahai and Ors.
8 SCC 47 · 2015 · Reported
35
citing judgments

Sanction for prosecution under Section 197 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is required for public servants who were or are in service, distinguishing it from Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, which does not require sanction for those who have ceased to be public servants.

Tribune Trist v. CIT
390 ITR 547 · 2017 · High Court
33
citing judgments

The proviso to Section 2(15) of the Income Tax Act cannot be invoked against city improvement trusts if their activities are not in the nature of trade, commerce, or business, even if they generate surplus or sell developed plots.

Aurora Educational Society v. CCIT
20 Taxmann.com 46 · 2012 · Reported
31
citing judgments

The scope and amplitude of Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and its applicable provisos, rules, and forms are the subject of examination in relation to applications for approval.

CIT v. Indian Jute Mills Association
134 ITR 68 · 1982 · High Court
30
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred includes depreciation claims. Necessary provisions required by statute, such as for gratuity and leave encashment, can be considered as applied for the objects of a trust.

New Noble Educational Society v. Chief CIT
334 ITR 303 · 2011 · High Court
22
citing judgments

In Andhra Pradesh, only societies, associations, or trusts can establish educational institutions, as individuals are prohibited from doing so under Section 20A of the AP Education Act.

Judgments on Section 10(23C)(vi)

Rahul Shikshan Sansthan, Jaipur vs. CIT(E), Jaipur

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 308/JPR/2020[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur04 Oct 2021AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Vikram Singh Yadav, Am Vk;Dj Vihy La-@Ita No. 308/Jp/2020 Fu/Kzkj.K O"Kz@Assessment Year: 2019-20 Rahul Shikshan Sansthan, Cuke C.I.T.(Exemptions), Vs. Gayatri Nagar-Ii, Tonk Road, Kailash Height, Lal Sanganer, Jaipur-302029. Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur-302015. Lfkk;H Ys[Kk La-@Thvkbzvkj La-@Pan/Gir No.: Aabtr 5477 R Vihykfkhz@Appellant Izr;Fkhz@Respondent Fu/Kzkfjrh Dh Vksj Ls@ Assessee By : Shri K.L. Chaudhary (Ca) Jktlo Dh Vksj Ls@ Revenue By: Shri B.K. Gupta (Pcit) Lquokbz Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Hearing : 04/10/2021 Mn?Kks"K.Kk Dh Rkjh[K@ Date Of Pronouncement : 04/10/2021 Vkns'K@ Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(E), Jaipur Dated 15/09/2020 For The A.Y. 2019-20, Wherein Following Grounds Have Been Taken: “1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case The Ld. Cit Has Grossly Erred In Rejecting The Ground Of Exemption Under Section 10(23C(Vi) Of The Income Act, 1961 Arbitrarily. 2. The Society Registered Under The Rajasthan Society Registration Act, 1958 On Dated 19/08/2000 With Name M/S Rahul Shikshan Sansthan Registration Number 486/Jaipur/2000-2001. The Society'S Registered Office Address Is Gyatri Nagar-Ii, Tonk Road, Sanganer, Jaipur, Rajasthan With Educational Object. The Society Have Pan Aabtr5477R. The Society Running Sr.

For Appellant: Shri K.L. Chaudhary (CA)For Respondent: Shri B.K. Gupta (PCIT)
Section 10