Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s.Jayalakshmi Chits

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

250/­ only.” 8.6. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the order  of the CIT (A), revenue as well as assessee  filed   appeals   before   the   Tribunal.   The  Tribunal   after   considering   the   submissions  and material on record held that the CIT has  committed an error by allowing the short term  loss   claimed   by   the   assessee,   though   the  assessee   could  not  establish   the  factum

The Commissioner of Income Tax - VI vs. M/s. Manikanta Iron AND Hardware

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

250/­ only.” 8.6. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the order  of the CIT (A), revenue as well as assessee  filed   appeals   before   the   Tribunal.   The  Tribunal   after   considering   the   submissions  and material on record held that the CIT has  committed an error by allowing the short term  loss   claimed   by   the   assessee,   though   the  assessee   could  not  establish   the  factum

Commissioner of Income tax-VI vs. M/s. Narpat Girji Constructions,

The appeal is allowed

Section 457 of the Companies Act r/w Rule 9 of the Companies (Court) Rules. In Paragraph 11 of the said application, KIAMS submitted that the it would be constrained to get the property transferred into their name immediately, failing which, the Institution would not be recognized. It was also said that they were willing

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7, HYD vs. M/S. DECCAN GRAMEENA BANK, HYD

Appeals are dismissed on withdrawal

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Transfer Pricing), 6th floor, B Block, lT Towers, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad, in PAN No.AAACF2723N dated 28.0'1.2013 preferred against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 1 (2), Hyderabad PANiGIR No. AAACF2723N dated 21.01 .2O14. (Appeals)-1, Hyderab, rd, Appeal No.0134/ClT (A)-llHyd/2O13 '14, 2015-16 dated 17.02.2016 preferred rgainst the Order of the Deputy Commiss oner

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HYD vs. M/S CONEXANT SYSTEMS PRIVATE LTD., HYD

Appeals are dismissed on withdrawal

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Transfer Pricing), 6th floor, B Block, lT Towers, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad, in PAN No.AAACF2723N dated 28.0'1.2013 preferred against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 1 (2), Hyderabad PANiGIR No. AAACF2723N dated 21.01 .2O14. (Appeals)-1, Hyderab, rd, Appeal No.0134/ClT (A)-llHyd/2O13 '14, 2015-16 dated 17.02.2016 preferred rgainst the Order of the Deputy Commiss oner

THE PRINCIPAL COMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I vs. M/S.CELON LABORATOERIES PVT LTD

Appeals are dismissed on withdrawal

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Transfer Pricing), 6th floor, B Block, lT Towers, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad, in PAN No.AAACF2723N dated 28.0'1.2013 preferred against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 1 (2), Hyderabad PANiGIR No. AAACF2723N dated 21.01 .2O14. (Appeals)-1, Hyderab, rd, Appeal No.0134/ClT (A)-llHyd/2O13 '14, 2015-16 dated 17.02.2016 preferred rgainst the Order of the Deputy Commiss oner

PRINICIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7, HYD vs. M/S. DECCAN GRAMEENA BANK, HYD

Appeals are dismissed on withdrawal

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Transfer Pricing), 6th floor, B Block, lT Towers, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad, in PAN No.AAACF2723N dated 28.0'1.2013 preferred against the Order of the Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle 1 (2), Hyderabad PANiGIR No. AAACF2723N dated 21.01 .2O14. (Appeals)-1, Hyderab, rd, Appeal No.0134/ClT (A)-llHyd/2O13 '14, 2015-16 dated 17.02.2016 preferred rgainst the Order of the Deputy Commiss oner

M/s. Canara Securities Ltd vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Bench: M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO,T.AMARNATH GOUD

Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the Chairman of the company, HVL cannot arrogate unto himself the power to cause such appointment when such power ultimately rests with the Board of Directors. The observation of the two Joint APLs that the evident performance of BCrL, the flagship company of MP Birla Group is deteriorating ever since, HVL became

The Pr. Commissioner of Income tax (Central), vs. Sri Vaishnavi Educational Society,

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar W.P. No.51929/2014 C/W W.P.Nos.42063/2012, 30494/2013, 42671/2013, 638/2014, 797/2014, 1089/2014, 3211/2014, 3389/2014, 6180/2014, 10356/2014, 12014/2014, 12015/2014, 13043/2014, 13045/2014, 13206/2014, 13207/2014, 13398/2014, 13774/2014, 14149/2014, 14161/2014, 14494/2014, 14502/2014, 14521/2014, 14689/2014, 16646/2014, 17051/2014, 17594/2014, 19729/2014, 21158/2014, 23897/2014, 28861/2014, 30731/2014, 31723/2014, 33774/2014, 33777/2014, 34084/2014, 34259/2014, 34272/2014, 34391/2014, 35204/2014, 35243/2014, 35247/2014, 35305/2014, 35609/2014, 36164/2014, 36166/2014, 36489/2014, 36525/2014, 36971/2014, 37446/2014, 38055/2014, 38463/2014, 38471/2014, 38472/2014, 38661/2014, 38753/2014, 39383/2014, 39633/2014, 39832/2014, 40204/2014, 40379/2014, 41394/2014, 41422/2014, 41427/2014, 41428/2014, 41858/2014, 43815/2014, 43963/2014, 44306/2014, 44527/2014, 44742/2014, 44835/2014, 45486/2014, 46766/2014, 47103/2014, 47105/2014, 47106/2014, 47107/2014, 47608/2014, 47731/2014, 47821/2014, 47860/2014, 47913/2014, 48577/2014, 48880/2014, 49567/2014, 50260/2014, 50533/2014, 51294/2014, 51930/2014, 51931/2014, 51932/2014, 52760/2014, 53854/2014, 54059/2014, 54083/2014, 54236/2014

SECTION 19(1) OF THE BDA ACT I.E., ANNEX-P, IN SO FAR AS IT RELATES TO THE PROPERTIES OF THE PETITIONER IN SY.NO.30/6 & 30/7, K. NARAYANAPURA VILLAGE, K.R. PURAM HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, MEASURING 22 GUNTAS AND 26 GUNTAS RESPECTIVELY. IN W.P.NO.55081/2014: BETWEEN: MR N. R. VENKATESHMURTHY S/O SRI. RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT HOUSE NO.5