BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “depreciation”+ Section 10Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai309Bangalore297Delhi281Chennai128Kolkata62Karnataka31Jaipur21Surat16Pune15Ahmedabad13Hyderabad13Telangana9Cochin8Lucknow8Guwahati5SC3Patna3Chandigarh2Varanasi2Nagpur2Visakhapatnam1Calcutta1Indore1Rajkot1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 26015Section 10A11Section 115J8Section 10B7Depreciation7Deduction5Section 2634Set Off of Losses4Section 260A3Section 10

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. M/s Matrix Power Pvt Ltd.,

ITTA/386/2013HC Telangana03 Sept 2013
Section 10BSection 143(3)Section 260A

depreciation etc. came into force. 14. The rationale behind both sub-section (4) and sub-section (6) is not far to seek. The legislature obviously wanted to ensure that if the profits from the eligible undertaking are allowed to enjoy the benefits of Section 10A

The Pr. Commissioner of Income-tax vs. D.L.V. Sridhar

ITTA/365/2018HC Telangana22 Oct 2018

Bench: D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 10Section 10A
3
Section 234D3
Addition to Income3
Section 115
Section 260

Section 10A of the Act. The Assessing Officer, though unable to point out any defect, deficiency or wrong entry in the books for the exempt and non- exempt unit, drew a table of income earned and expenses incurred under different heads as per the books relatable to the exempt and non-exempt unit. He observed that there was substantial difference

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Mohan Milk Line Pvt Ltd

The appeals are allowed only to the aforesaid

ITTA/253/2014HC Telangana06 Apr 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 10ASection 234DSection 260

Section 10A as well as depreciation and the adjustment against the income of the respective assessment year, was at large

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV vs. M/s. Nav Bharat Enterprises Limited

ITTA/169/2013HC Telangana02 Jul 2013
Section 10ASection 10A(3)Section 195Section 260Section 260ASection 40

depreciation of Rs.17.06,58,039/- on software imported even though the assessing authority had rightly disallowed the expenditure under section 40(a)(i) of IT Act as the assessee had failed to comply with the provisions of section 195 while making payments to the vendors? (3) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the tribunal is right

THE PRL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX [CENTRAL] HYDERABAD vs. M/S SREE NAGENDRA CONSTRUCTIONS, KHAMMAM

In the result, appeal stands dismissed

ITTA/490/2016HC Telangana21 Aug 2018

Bench: This

Section 10Section 260Section 260ASection 35Section 43

depreciation to be allowed with reference to such increased/decreased cost. .…… The section mandates that at any time there is change in the rate of exchange, the same may be given effect to by way of - 8 - adjustment of the carrying cost of the fixed assets acquired in foreign currency.” In the light of the said decision, this substantial question

M/s. CCL Products (India) Ltd., vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax -1

In the result, the appeals are dismissed

ITTA/279/2012HC Telangana20 Aug 2013
Section 10ASection 260Section 263

depreciation against the total income for computing deduction u/s.10A of the Act, was contrary to the provisions of section 10A

Commissioner of IncomeTax-II, vs. M/S RK Hair Products Pvt Limited,

In the result, the appeals are dismissed

ITTA/280/2012HC Telangana16 Jul 2013
Section 10ASection 260Section 263

depreciation against the total income for computing deduction u/s.10A of the Act, was contrary to the provisions of section 10A

The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Smt.Anitha Sanghi

ITTA/97/2010HC Telangana21 Mar 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 14ASection 260

depreciation on securities (iv) floating rate notes of London branch (v) DICGC loans (vi) suits filed accounts (vii) miscellaneous provision cannot be added back in accordance with Explanation of Section 115JA of the Act in the light of the judgment of the Apex court in H.C.L. Comnet when there is diminution in the value of assets as contended

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs. M/s Indur Green Power Private Limited

In the result, all the appeals fail and are hereby

ITTA/627/2015HC Telangana02 Jun 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 2(15)Section 25Section 260Section 80G(5)

Depreciation 1,05,72,696 1,10,86,334 1,26,18,427 1,39,66,450 Total Expenditure 4,81,29,896 4,75,41,722 5,01,63,902 3,88,21,912 Profit for the year 2,53,21,438 2,09,87,242 62,58,319 836236 Add Balance brought forward