The Commissioner of Income Tax-III vs. Smt.Anitha Sanghi

Similar judgments

Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.

• The Commissioner of Income Tax vs Syndicate Bank
  Karnataka17 Jan 2020Dismissed

  Also relies on CIT v. Essar Tele and 3 other authorities

  The High Court held that for Section 14A to apply, there must be an actual expenditure (pay out), and not merely a return of investment. It also noted that Section 115JA does not apply to banking companies, rendering oth...

• The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -Central… vs R.J. Corp. Ltd
  Delhi12 Dec 2025Dismissed

  Also relies on CIT v. Walfort Share & Stock Brokers (P.) Ltd. and 1 other authority

  The Tribunal held that the disallowance under Section 14A should be restricted to the extent of exempt income earned (Rs. 50,000/-). The amendment brought by the Finance Act 2022 was considered prospective and not applic...

• Shri. Shankarlal Gilada vs The Income Tax Officer
  Karnataka22 Jan 2020Dismissed

  Also relies on PCIT v. State Bank of Patiala and 1 other authority

  The High Court held that the Assessing Officer, Appellate Authority, and Tribunal correctly applied Section 14A based on the Supreme Court's decision in Maxopp Investment Ltd. The disallowance of interest expenditure was...

• Technologies Ltd) vs ACIT
  Delhi5 Jul 2021Allowed

  Also relies on CIT v. Essar Tele and 1 other authority

  The Tribunal erred in disallowing the deduction under Section 35DD, as it should be allowable to the resulting company. The Tribunal also erred in applying the matching principle to spread the one-time lease rent over th...

• Technologies Ltd) vs ACIT
  Delhi5 Jul 2021Allowed

  Also relies on CIT v. Essar Tele and 1 other authority

  The Delhi High Court held that the deduction under Section 35DD was allowable to the resulting company and that the commuted/discounted one-time lease rent was a revenue expenditure deductible in the year it was incurred...