BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “depreciation”+ Long Term Capital Gainsclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,239Delhi843Bangalore365Chennai346Kolkata206Ahmedabad134Jaipur101Hyderabad67Chandigarh49Indore47Raipur42Pune40Karnataka29Lucknow27Cochin27Visakhapatnam18Surat17Nagpur16SC14Guwahati8Panaji7Telangana7Jodhpur6Rajkot5Calcutta5Kerala4Amritsar4Cuttack3Agra3Varanasi2Allahabad1Punjab & Haryana1Himachal Pradesh1Patna1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 2605Section 260A2Section 2(15)2Section 36(1)(viii)2Section 14A2Disallowance2Capital Gains2Business Income2Addition to Income2

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, HYD vs. M/S. SUJANA METALS LTD, HYD

ITTA/549/2011HC Telangana21 Apr 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 260Section 28

depreciation is prescribed”. 8. It can also be said that the „right to carry on any business‟ has been recognized by the legislature as capital asset for the purposes of assessing and computing the capital gains as is clear from the reading of Section 55 (2) (a) of the Act, which is in the following terms:- (2) For the purposes

Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajahmundry vs. M/s. Kakinada Coop. Town Bank LTd., Kakinada

ITTA/485/2012HC Telangana15 Nov 2012

Bench: The Court Is: “Whether, The Shares Invested Through A Portfolio Management

Section 271(1)(c)
Section 88E

capital gains. The assessee also attempted to produce evidence to show that the intention had not been to earn trading profit: first, the investment was undertaken by the assessee with its own surplus funds, and not borrowed funds, and second, that the holding period for a majority of the transactions was substantial. Moreover, the assessee sought to show that

COMM OF INCOME TAX, HYD vs. M/S. BALAN NATURAL FOOD PRIVATE LTD., HYD

ITTA/140/2016HC Telangana12 Oct 2018

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,KONGARA VIJAYA LAKSHMI

Section 10Section 115Section 115JSection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 260Section 36Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viii)

depreciation claimed on securities classified as ‘Held to Maturity’ and further held that the assessee had earned aggregate sum of Rs.68,65,73,177/-, which is exempt under various sub-Sections of Section 10 of the Act and disallowed the aforesaid amount in terms of Section 14A of the Act. A sum of Rs.3,43,28,658/- being 5% thereof

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III, vs. M/S. SAVIJANA SEA FOODS PVT. LTD.,

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITTA/55/2010HC Telangana20 Dec 2024

Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO,ALOK ARADHE

Section 260

terms of the completion certificate issued by the NDMC, the LGF was sanctioned as „storage.‟ It was for this reason that the buyers lost interest. The Assessee then decided to return the advance received and also compensate the buyers since the buyers‟ funds had remained with the Assessee for some time. The Assessee had sought to explain that this compensation

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Kokivenkateswara Reddy AND others,

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITTA/210/2003HC Telangana21 Jun 2011

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

Section 260

terms of the completion certificate issued by the NDMC, the LGF was sanctioned as „storage.‟ It was for this reason that the buyers lost interest. The Assessee then decided to return the advance received and also compensate the buyers since the buyers‟ funds had remained with the Assessee for some time. The Assessee had sought to explain that this compensation

The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs. M/s.Mold-Tek Technologies Ltd

ITTA/273/2011HC Telangana29 Feb 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 12Section 2(15)Section 260A

depreciation exceeds the surplus as generated from holding coaching classes. In addition, the petitioner institute provides study material and other academic support such as facilities of a library without any material additional costs. The Supreme Court in the case of State of Andhra Pradesh v. H. Abdul Bakhi and Bros. (supra) held as under: The expression "business" though extensively used

Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS), vs. M/s Country Club Inda Limited

ITTA/667/2014HC Telangana29 Jan 2015
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 260A

depreciation or any other indirect costs in its accounts. Further, the Assessee had also not showed any source of funds. The AO noted that the equipment stated to have been supplied by the Assessee to Reliance was purchased from other group companies, namely, Nortel Canada and Nortel Ireland and were supplied to Reliance at almost half the price