BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “depreciation”+ Charitable Trustclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai421Delhi318Chennai316Bangalore275Karnataka86Jaipur61Kolkata46Ahmedabad33Lucknow32Pune29Hyderabad20Visakhapatnam18Chandigarh17Cochin16Amritsar14Surat10Rajkot7Indore7Telangana7Kerala5Nagpur4Jodhpur4Cuttack4Patna3Ranchi2Calcutta2SC2Dehradun2Orissa1Rajasthan1Raipur1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 80I7Exemption6Section 13(8)5Charitable Trust5Section 114Section 2604Section 2634Section 12A4Depreciation4Section 2(15)

The Commissioner of Income Tax-I vs. Ascend Telecom Infrastructure Private Limited

ITTA/346/2015HC Telangana06 Apr 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 11Section 260Section 32

Charitable Trust. It was also registered with the Commissioner, Pune. The assessee derived income from the temple property which was a Trust property. During the course of assessment proceedings for assessment years 1977-78, 1978-79 and 1979-80, the assessee claimed depreciation

The Commissioner of Income Tax - IV vs. M/s. Mekins Agro Product (P) Ltd.

ITTA/449/2013HC Telangana25 Sept 2013
Section 11(1)Section 29
3
Section 403
Deduction3
Section 32

depreciation under section 32, the assessee is entitled is the case pressed before us by the senior counsel appearing for the assessee. We have no doubt in our mind that business income of charitable trust

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2 vs. M/s Indur Green Power Private Limited

In the result, all the appeals fail and are hereby

ITTA/627/2015HC Telangana02 Jun 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 2(15)Section 25Section 260Section 80G(5)

trust, certain details including the nature of activities were called for vide this office letter no. DIT(E)/12AA/2005-06/624 dated Page 5 of 96 C/TAXAP/627/2015 JUDGMENT 13/6/2006, there was no compliance, thereafter, another letter dated 27/7/2006 was issued and served calling for the details by 10/8/2006, in response to which the assessee failed to furnish the required details, which

The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs. M/s.Mold-Tek Technologies Ltd

ITTA/273/2011HC Telangana29 Feb 2016

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

Section 12Section 2(15)Section 260A

depreciation exceeds the surplus as generated from holding coaching classes. In addition, the petitioner institute provides study material and other academic support such as facilities of a library without any material additional costs. The Supreme Court in the case of State of Andhra Pradesh v. H. Abdul Bakhi and Bros. (supra) held as under: The expression "business" though extensively used

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S. SOMA ENTERPRISES LTD

The appeal is disposed off accordingly

ITTA/209/2010HC Telangana16 Jul 2025

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

Section 11Section 12ASection 133ASection 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 194JSection 260Section 40

charitable trust having its office at Nagamangala Taluk, Tumakuru District. It has been in existence since 1973. 2. The Trust has got registered under Section 12A of the Act on 17.07.1974. It is running various educational institutions throughout the State of 3 Karnataka. During the financial year 2006-07, the Trust was also running a hospital by the name

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Dr. T.Ravi Kumar

The appeal is disposed of

ITTA/382/2012HC Telangana24 Jul 2013
Section 12ASection 13(8)Section 260Section 260ASection 263Section 80I

trust. It is also argued that the Tribunal has rightly set aside the order passed under Section 263 of the Act. It is also urged that decision relied upon by the revenue in the case of AMITABH BACHAN supra does not support the case of the revenue as in the aforesaid case, the assessee had withdrawn the claim

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II vs. M/S.TRANSPORT CORPORATION OF INDIA

In the result, we set aside the assessment orders, except to

ITTA/133/2014HC Telangana03 Aug 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

For Appellant: --------------------------------------------------------For Respondent: ------------------------------------------------------
Section 11Section 132Section 44Section 44A

CHARITABLE TRUST CHANDANATHOPE, KOLLAM. BY ADV. SRI.S.ARUN RAJ RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/REVENUE: ------------------------------------------------------ COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. SRI P.K.R.MENON(SR.) SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19-09-2014, ALONG WITH ITA. 134/2014, ITA. 135/2014, ITA. 136/2014, ITA. 137/2014, ITA. 139/2014, ITA. 140/2014 & ITA. 142/2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME