Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. The Sind Coop. Urban Bank Ltd.,

The appeal of the State is allowed and the appeal of the applicants

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

condonation of delay. The factum of the notification under the EFL Act having been published subsequent to the dismissal of the appeal by this Court, is not at all relevant since the exemption

Maheswara Educational Society, vs. Director of Income Tax (Exemptions)

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Exemptions) as also the ITAT ought to have allowed the appeal and condoned the delay considering the bona fide and reasonable

The Commissioner of Income Tax-V, vs. Sri. P.Krishna

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

delay can be condoned, the claimant can only be enti ed for interest on the enhanced compensation from the date of the order passed by this Court. He submits that the Tribunal ought to have seen that there is conkibutory negligence on the part of the driver of the car i.e., deceased. He further submits that the compensation that

The Commissioner of Income Tax [Central] vs. Smt P Sujana

The appeal stands disposed of as indicated above

Bench: CHALLA KODANDA RAM,G.CHANDRAIAH

exemption, deduction, after the expiry of the period prescribed by or under the Act, in any case or class of cases. Accordingly, the CIT (Appeals) rejected the claim of carry forward of the loss, further observing that the assessee had not moved any application to CBDT for condonation of delay

Sri Natakari Gopal vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and 2 Others

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 3Rd January, 2023. Appearance : Mr. Tilak Mita, Adv. ..For Appellant Mr. Pranit Bag , Adv. Mr. A. K. Mishra, Adv. Mr. Debdatta Saha, Adv. …For Respondent Re: Ga/1/2022 The Court:- Heard Mr. Tilak Mitra, Learned Advocate For The Appellant & Mr. Pranit Bag, Learned Advocate For The Respondent. There Is A Delay Of 1126 Days In Filing The Appeal. Though The Reasons Given In The Affidavit Are Not Convincing The Issues Involved In The Appeal Had Been Decided By This Court In Earlier Matters, This Court Exercises Discretion & Condone The Delay In Filing The Appeal. Accordingly, The Application Is Allowed.

condone the delay in filing the appeal. Accordingly, the application is allowed. ITAT/238/2022 This appeal filed by the revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] is directed against the order dated 15.2.2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal “B” Bench, Kolkata [Tribunal] in ITA No.2467/Kol/2017 for the assessment year 2014-15 the revenue

THE COMMISSIONER OF I.T.-I, HYDERABAD. vs. M/S. AKASH CABLE TV NETWORK PVT.LTD., HYDERABAD.

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. Application is allowed. CM No.6953/2012 in ITA 252/2012 CM No.6956/2012 in ITA 253/2012 CM No.6972/2012 in ITA 258/2012 ITA Nos.252/12, 253/12 & 258/12 Page 2 of 8 This is an application for condonation of delay

THE COMMIR.OF INCOME-TAX A.P.-II.HYD. vs. MOHD.SIDDIQ PROP.M/S.HUMA ATCHANDRADIO.

In the result, Question No

condonation of such delay. In the above set of facts and circumstances, the assessee has sought the above referred questions of law for opinion of this Court. The learned counsel for the assessee contends that the reasoning recorded by the Tribunal for reversing the order of the first appellate authority and coming to a different conclusion is erroneous and unsustainable

M/s. Vodafone Mobile Services Limited, vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

Bench: SUJOY PAUL,NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

exemption) Allowed subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. No. 49433/2018 & CM APPL. No. 49435/2018 These applications for condonation of delay

PRINCIPLE COMMISSIONER INCOME TAX-2 vs. JEEVAN SHAKTHI CHIT FUND PVT LTD.,

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions. The applications are disposed of. C.M. Nos.1788/2015. 3937/2015. 3939/2015. 3940/2015 and 3942/2015 For the reasons stated in the applications the delay in re-filing the appeals is condoned

Commissioner of Income Tax- IT and TP vs. M/s. Louis Berger International Inc.,

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

delay in the clearance of the imported consignments, the appellants and its sister concern had been compelled to pay excess duty of over Rs 25 crores from August 2013 onwards. It is unfortunate and has to be accepted that the respondent authorities had compelled and forced the appellant to furnish the letter dated 6- 3-2017 thereby waiving

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. M/s. Andhra Pradesh Mineral Development Corporation Ltd.

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

delay in the clearance of the imported consignments, the appellants and its sister concern had been compelled to pay excess duty of over Rs 25 crores from August 2013 onwards. It is unfortunate and has to be accepted that the respondent authorities had compelled and forced the appellant to furnish the letter dated 6- 3-2017 thereby waiving