M/s. PLL-PCL Joint Venture vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

In the result, all the three appeals are allowed, the delay of one year

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,SANJAY KUMAR

condonation of delay?” 3. The relevant facts may be noticed first. The appellant-assessee was an individual and had been

The Commissioner of Income TAx-IV, vs. M/s. Mahaveer Enterprises (India) Limited

The Appeal is dismissed

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

delay in filing the appeal then fairly exercising such discretion either to condone or not to condone

The Commissioner of Income Tax- IV vs. M/s. Prabhat Agri Bio Tech P Ltd.

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

condonation of delay in filing the present appeal) ASHOK LEYLAND FINANCE LTD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Avi Singh with

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Sri Nama Nageshwar Rao

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

Condonation of Delay) PCIT (CENTRAL) - 3 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Ajit Sharma, Senior Standing Counsel versus ANAND KUMAR JAIN

North East Securities Ltd, vs. The Deputy Commissioner,

Bench: A RAMALINGESWARA RAO,DILIP B. BHOSALE

Delay in preferring the appeal has been condoned vide order of the date passed on delay condonation

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3 vs. Smt.Y.Uma Rani

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam A N D The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : February 3, 2022. [Via Video Conference] Appearance : Mr. Asok Bhowmik, Adv. … For The Appellant Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Soumya Kejriwal, Adv. Mr. Anand Agarwal, Adv. ..For The Respondent The Court : We Have Heard Mr. Asok Bhowmik, Learned Standing Counsel Appearing For The Appellant/Revenue & Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Learned Senior Counsel Duly Assisted By Mr. Soumya Kejriwal & Mr. Anand Agarwal, Learned Counsel For The Respondent/Assessee.

condone delay petition. Accordingly, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned The petition for condonation

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Agricultural Market Committee

Accordingly, the appeal (ITAT/11/2011) stands dismissed

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

condone the delay so that the appeal can be disposed of. Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay

SLS Developers vs. The Income Tax Officer

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

delay and the authorities have also been vested with the' powers to condone the delay on sufficient

The Commissioner of Income Tax - II, vs. Sri Shikari Vishwanatam

delay of 1807 days in preferring this appeal. Hence, an application is filed to condone the - 3 - delay

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I vs. M/S. AVINEON INDIA PVT. LTD.,

The appeal is dismissed

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

condonation of delay in re-filing the appeal) & ITA 48/2016 1. There is an inordinate delay of 1531 days

Commissioner of Income Tax-II vs. The Sind Coop. Urban Bank Ltd.,

The appeal of the State is allowed and the appeal of the applicants

Bench: V.V.S.RAO,RAMESH RANGANATHAN

delay condonation sought. The land was purchased by the applicants 1 to 3 in 2005, after which Ext.A9

The Commissioner of Income Tax -I, vs. M/s. Bhagyanagar Studios

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

condonation of delay is allowed and the delay of 642 days is hereby condoned. RA-CR-133-CII-2016 1. This

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Agricultural Market Committee

The appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 3Rd February, 2022 Appearance :- Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv.

condone the delay in filing the appeal. The application for condonation of delay is allowed. This

Commissioner of Income Tax-I, vs. Agriculturl Market Committee

The appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect

Bench: : The Hon’Ble Justice T.S. Sivagnanam & The Hon’Ble Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya Date : 11Th May, 2022. Appearance : Ms. Smita Das De, Adv. ….For Appellant Ms. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, Adv. …For Respondent The Court : We Have Heard Ms. Smita Das Dey, Learned Standing Counsel Appearing For The Appellant/Revenue & Ms. Nilanjana Banerjee Pal, Learned Advocate Appearing For The Respondent/Assessee. There Is A Delay In Filing The Appeal & This Application Being Ga/1/2011 (Old No. Ga/1658/2011) Has Been Filed For Condonation Of Delay. There Was A Condition Imposed By The Division Bench Of This Court On 17Th August, 2011 That The Appellant Shall Pay A Cost Of Rs.10,000/- To The Counsel For The Respondent. This Condition Has Not Been Complied With.

condone the delay in filing the appeal. The petition for condonation of delay stands allowed. ITAT/154/2011

The Commissioner of Income Tax IV, vs. Parnika Constructions P. Ltd.,

Appeal is allowed in the aforesaid terms

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

delay of 66 days in preferring the appeal, as such, this Court should not condone the delay

COMMR OF INCOME TAX-II, HYDERABAD vs. M/S TCI HI-WAYS PVT LTD., SECUDERABAD

Bench: Entering Into The Merit Of The Main Petition

condoning the delay of 266 days in each case in all the aforesaid Civil Miscellaneous Petitions, therefore, this

The Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. K.C.P Limited

Bench: Entering Into The Merit Of The Main Petition

condoning the delay of 266 days in each case in all the aforesaid Civil Miscellaneous Petitions, therefore, this

Commissioner of Income Tax, vs. M/s. Best India Tobacco Suppliers Private Limited,

Appeals are dismissed

Bench: GODA RAGHURAM,M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO

condonation of delay, of 170 days in W.A.353/12 and 2661 days in W.A.2267/18. Delay of 2661 has been