AP State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited vs. The Income Tax Officer

In the result, the Appeals are partly allowed

Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO,ALOK ARADHE

260-4 of the lncome tax Act, 1961, against the order of the lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench "B" Hyderabad in l.T.A No. 326 lHydl 2000 ( Assessment Year 1,996 - 1997 ) dated 31-10-2007 preferred against the order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals) -lV , Hyderabad dated 04-02-2000 in Appeal No. 333/lTO.4

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) vs. Sri.G.Sanjay Chowdary

Bench: RAMESH RANGANATHAN,M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY

260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’, for the sake of brevity) by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Hubli, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Revenue’ for the sake of convenience), assailing the legality and correctness of order dated 15.05.2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ‘A’ Bench, Bangalore (hereinafter referred

M/S NATIONAL ACADEMY OF CONSTRUCTION vs. ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

trust?,,. He further stressed upon the ^,,^-.;^_ ^a r^--. _ qucsiloil oi iaii as iu -wirElher fhe Tritrunal shoulci have helci iirat, in any errent ancl without prejudice to the clairn of the appellants the denia! cf exemption on the u'hole of the receipt -itu-as illcgal at least the amount to be taxed should have been conflned to the amount

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III vs. M/S. SOMA ENTERPRISES LTD

The appeal is disposed off accordingly

Bench: The Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Ravi Malimath

TRUST, ADICHUNCHANAGIRI KSHETRA, 2 NAGAMANGALA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A. SHANKAR, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI. M. LAVA, ADVOCATE) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO (1) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN; (2) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME

Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Dr. T.Ravi Kumar

The appeal is disposed of

260-A OF I.T. ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT F ORDER DATED 29.06.2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.146/BANG/2012 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10, PRAYING TO: (I) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN. 2 (I) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.146/BANG/2012 DATED 29/06/2012 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE

M/s. Canara Securities Ltd vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Bench: M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO,T.AMARNATH GOUD

Charitable societies and trusts are not part of the estate of the testatrix which are managed by the respective managing committees and trustees of the societies or trusts. The companies are separate legal entities controlled by their Board of Directors and the affairs of the estate of the testatrix do not include the right to control the affairs

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S NUZIVEEDU SEEDS LTD.,

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

TRUST 103/1, BASAVANPUR OFF. BANNERGATTA ROAD BANGALORE ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI UDAY SHANKAR R.M, ADVOCATE) THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 30.09.2015 PASSED BY THE ITAT ‘C’ BENCH, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.1023/BANG/2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR

The Pr. Commissioner of Income tax (Central), vs. Sri Vaishnavi Educational Society,

Bench: The Hon’Ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar W.P. No.51929/2014 C/W W.P.Nos.42063/2012, 30494/2013, 42671/2013, 638/2014, 797/2014, 1089/2014, 3211/2014, 3389/2014, 6180/2014, 10356/2014, 12014/2014, 12015/2014, 13043/2014, 13045/2014, 13206/2014, 13207/2014, 13398/2014, 13774/2014, 14149/2014, 14161/2014, 14494/2014, 14502/2014, 14521/2014, 14689/2014, 16646/2014, 17051/2014, 17594/2014, 19729/2014, 21158/2014, 23897/2014, 28861/2014, 30731/2014, 31723/2014, 33774/2014, 33777/2014, 34084/2014, 34259/2014, 34272/2014, 34391/2014, 35204/2014, 35243/2014, 35247/2014, 35305/2014, 35609/2014, 36164/2014, 36166/2014, 36489/2014, 36525/2014, 36971/2014, 37446/2014, 38055/2014, 38463/2014, 38471/2014, 38472/2014, 38661/2014, 38753/2014, 39383/2014, 39633/2014, 39832/2014, 40204/2014, 40379/2014, 41394/2014, 41422/2014, 41427/2014, 41428/2014, 41858/2014, 43815/2014, 43963/2014, 44306/2014, 44527/2014, 44742/2014, 44835/2014, 45486/2014, 46766/2014, 47103/2014, 47105/2014, 47106/2014, 47107/2014, 47608/2014, 47731/2014, 47821/2014, 47860/2014, 47913/2014, 48577/2014, 48880/2014, 49567/2014, 50260/2014, 50533/2014, 51294/2014, 51930/2014, 51931/2014, 51932/2014, 52760/2014, 53854/2014, 54059/2014, 54083/2014, 54236/2014

TRUST, (REGD.) NO.33, CHALAKERE, K.R.PURAM HOBLI, BANASWADI POST, 42 BANGALORE-560 043, REPTD. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE-CUM-SECRETARY, V.VENKATARAMA REDDY ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. P. KRISHNAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BANGLAORE-560 001, REPTD. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T.CHOWDAIAH ROAD KUMARA PARK WEST BANGALORE