BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “capital gains”+ Section 45clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai2,717Delhi2,363Bangalore948Chennai742Kolkata484Ahmedabad415Jaipur360Hyderabad308Chandigarh177Pune159Indore128Cochin94Raipur91Surat65Nagpur63Rajkot58Visakhapatnam45Lucknow43SC41Amritsar38Patna34Karnataka28Guwahati27Calcutta25Cuttack21Jodhpur16Dehradun13Kerala11Agra9Jabalpur7Telangana7Orissa5Rajasthan5Ranchi5Allahabad5Varanasi5Panaji3A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN2Andhra Pradesh2ANIL R. DAVE SHIVA KIRTI SINGH1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1

Key Topics

Section 2608Section 260A6Section 54F5Capital Gains3Section 22Exemption2Long Term Capital Gains2Addition to Income2

M/S.R.S.RANGADAS vs. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Appeals are disposed of, with no order as to costs

ITTA/406/2005HC Telangana19 Oct 2022

Bench: C.V. BHASKAR REDDY,UJJAL BHUYAN

Section 2(47)Section 271(1)(c)Section 45(1)Section 48Section 54F

capital assets as defined in Section 2(47) of the Act and Section 45(1) of the Act which states that profits and gains

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, HYD vs. M/S. SUJANA METALS LTD, HYD

ITTA/549/2011HC Telangana21 Apr 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 260Section 28

capital gain by virtue of section 55 (2) (a) read with clause (i) of the proviso to Section 28 (va). The AR has also relied on the provisions of section 45

The Commissioner of Income Tax-IV vs. M/s Pokarna Limited

The appeals are dismissed

ITTA/273/2012HC Telangana18 Feb 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 260A

capital gains. This classification under distinct heads of income profits and gains is made having regard to the sources from which income is derived. Income-tax is undoubtedly levied on the total taxable income of the taxpayer and the tax levied is a single tax on the aggregate taxable receipts from all the sources; it is not a collection

SMT. SHANTHA VIDYASAGAR ANNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2) HYDERABAD

In the result, the orders dated 09

ITTA/527/2006HC Telangana07 Jan 2025

Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO,ALOK ARADHE

Section 144Section 148Section 2Section 260Section 260ASection 53Section 54F

capital asset in the assessment year lgg7 _gg and consequently no profit or gain accrued to the assessee in order to attra(:t Sections 45

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III, vs. M/S. SAVIJANA SEA FOODS PVT. LTD.,

Appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITTA/55/2010HC Telangana20 Dec 2024

Bench: J SREENIVAS RAO,ALOK ARADHE

Section 260

capital gains‟ in their hands in their returns would not be relevant in deciding the issue whether the payment by the Assessee should be treated as „business expenditure.‟ As explained by the Madras High Court in CIT v. Sarda Binding Works 102 ITR 187 (Mad), it is the point of view of the payer which is relevant. 37. The decision

M/S.P.SATYANARAYANA AND SONS vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1[9], HYDERABAD

Appeals are allowed

ITTA/209/2008HC Telangana08 Sept 2025

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA

Section 260

Capital gains") for- (i) the transfer of all or any rights (including the granting of a licence) in respect of a patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade mark or similar property; (ii) the imparting of any information concerning the working of, or the use of, a patent, invention, model, design, secret formula or process or trade

M/s Durga Granites, vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 1,

ITTA/30/2023HC Telangana04 Sept 2023

Bench: P.SAM KOSHY,LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

45 years, son of Hafijulla Ansari, resident of Bada Madansahi, P.O. & P.S. Bada Madansahi, District Sahibganj, PIN- 816190, Jharkhand. .........Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand, through its Secretary, Department of Industries, Mines and Geology, having its office at Yojna Bhawan, P.O. and P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi- 834 002. 2. The Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Jharkhand, having