KRUPA VILAS GAU SEVA TRUST,KUTCH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 162/Rjt/2023 (Assessment Year: Na) (Hybrid Hearing)

119(1) of the Act, extends the due date for electronic filing of such Form as under: (i) The application for registration or approval under Section 10(23C), 12A or 80G of the Act in form No.10AB, for which the last date for filing falls on or before 29th September, 2022, may be filed on or before 30th September

SHRI SAJADIALI SARDAR PATEL SEVA SAHKARI MANDLI LTD. ,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO WARD-2(1)(2), RAJKOT., RAJKOT

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am. & Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.607/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Hybrid Hearing) Shri Sajadiali Sardar Patel Seva Ito Ward-2, (1) (2) Vs. Sahkari Mandali Ltd. Rajkot – 360001 At Sajadiyali – Rajkot New Aayakar Bhavan, At Sajadiyali Taluka, Race Course Ring Road, Jamkandorana, Dist, Rajkot – 360001 Sajadiyali – Rajkot 360001 Gujrat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaaas2374L (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri D.M. Rindani, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav , Ld .Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 28 / 01 /2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 22 / 04/2025

Section 119(2)(b) empowers the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) and its delegated authorities to consider applications for condonation of delay

KRUPA VILAS GAU SEVA TRUST,KUTCH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपीलसं./Ita No. 162/Rjt/2023 (Assessment Year: Na) (Hybrid Hearing) Krupa Vilas Gau Seva Trust, Vs. Cit(Exemption), Kutch. Ahmedabad. Anjar, Anjar Road, Bhimasar Taluka Anjar, Kutch-370240. स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaetk8746K (अपीलार्थी/Assessee) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपीलसं./Ita No. 163/Rjt/2023 (Assessment Year: Na) (Hybrid Hearing) Krupa Vilas Gau Seva Trust, Vs. Cit(Exemption), Kutch. Ahmedabad. Anjar, Anjar Road, Bhimasar Taluka Anjar, Kutch-370240. स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaetk8746K (अपीलार्थी/Assessee) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) निर्धारितीकीओरसे/Assessee By : Shri Kalpesh Doshi, Ar राजस्वकीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख / Date Of Hearing : 09/01/2025 घोषणाकीतारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 24/03/2025 1 | Page

119(1) of the Act, extends the due date for electronic filing of such Form as under: (i) The application for registration or approval under Section 10(23C), 12A or 80G of the Act in form No.10AB, for which the last date for filing falls on or before 29th September, 2022, may be filed on or before 30th September

LATE ARJAN KANJI PUJARA SMARK CHARITABLE TRUST BHACHAU,BHACHAU vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, INCOME TAX (CPC), BANGALORE, BANGALORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed (Accountant Member), Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar (Judicial Member)

section 139 of the Act is condoned (ii) In all other cases of belated applications in filing Form No. 10B for years prior to AY. 2018-19, The commissioner of Income-tax are authorized to admit and dispose of by 31-3-2020 such applications for condonation of delay u's 119(2

SHREE SAMARTH SWITCHGEAR AND TRANSMISSION PVT LTD,JAMNAGAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

condone the delay of 120 days in ITA No.612/RJT/2024,as also 119 days’ delay, each in filing, the appeals in ITA No.609 and 610/RJT/2024, and admit these respective appeals for hearing. 7. For the sake of convenience, the grounds as well as the facts narrated in ITA No.612/RJT/2024, for assessment Year 2018-19, have been taken into consideration for deciding

SHREE SAMARTH ELECTRICALS PVT LTD,JAMNAGAR vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JAMNAGAR

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinha

condone the delay of 120 days in ITA No.612/RJT/2024,as also 119 days’ delay, each in filing, the appeals in ITA No.609 and 610/RJT/2024, and admit these respective appeals for hearing. 7. For the sake of convenience, the grounds as well as the facts narrated in ITA No.612/RJT/2024, for assessment Year 2018-19, have been taken into consideration for deciding

SAURASTRA VIPASSANA RESEARCH CENTRE,RAJKOT vs. THE ITO, WARD-1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

delay in filing of Form 10B has now been condoned by the appropriate authority, suitable directions may be given to Assessing Officer to allow the benefit of exemption under Section 11 & 12 of the Act. 6. On going through the facts of the case and the order under Section 119(2

M/S. KUTCH MANDVI BHATIYA MAHAJAN,MANDV-KUTCH vs. THE ITO-WARD-1, RAJKOT

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

section 119(2)(b) of the Act, the CBDT has decided that where the application for condonation of delay in filing

SHRI CHINTAN KANJIBHAI KATARIYA,ANJAR-KUTCH vs. THE ITO WARD-1, , GANDHIDHAM-KUTCH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Smt. Annapurna Gupta & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyal

2. The assessing officer as well as first appellate authority has erred in law and on facts in making and confirming the addition of Rs. Chetan Kanji Katariya vs. ITO Asst.Year –2013-14 5,87,178/- by disallowing the interest payment to NBFCs. The same deserves to be deleted. 3. The assessing officer as well as first appellate authority

SHREE LILIYA LATHI TALUKA SAHAKARI KHARID VECHAN SANGH LTD.,AT. LILIYA MOTA, TALUKA LATHI, DIST. AMRELI vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3 (1) (4), AMRELI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee, is dismissed, as withdrawn

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं/.Ita No.831/Rjt/2024 "नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: (2019-20) Liliya Lathi Taluka Sahkari Income Tax Officer Ward- बनाम Kharid Vechan Sangh Ltd. 3(1)(4), Rajkot. At Liliya Mota, Vs. Amreli-365535. Pan/Gir No. Abkas8870J "थायीलेखासं /. जीआइआरसं /. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) .. (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Shri D.M. Rindani, Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Sr. Dr

2. At the outset, Learned Counsel for the assessee, begins by pointing out that assessee filed a petition for condonation of delay under section 119

SHREEJI CERAMIC INDUSTRIES,MORBI vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. A.L.Saini, Am & Diesh Mohan Sinha, Jm आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.266/Rjt/2024 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2015-16) (Hybrid Hearing) Shreeji Ceramic Industries, The Principal Commissioner Of Vs. 8/A National Highway, Lalpar Income Tax – 1, Morbi - 363642 Rajkot "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aalfs8846B (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri D. M. Rindani, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Cit (Dr) सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 17/07/2025 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 12/08/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm: This Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Learned Principle Commissioner Of Income Tax, Rajkot – 1 [In Short, “The Ld. Pcit”], Dated 30.03.2021 For The Assessment Year (Ay) 2015-16. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Follows.

delay is hereby condoned. 8. Now we proceed to adjudicate the appeal on merit. 9. That the Assessee is in appeal before us. Ld. AR of the Assessee has drown our attention to the first para of Ld. PCIT’s order in which Ld. PCIT has mentioned that the case was selected for complete scrutiny under CASS and the assessment

SHRI SHARDAGRAM ALUMNI EDUCATION AND CHARITABLE TRUST,RAJKOT vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD, AHMEDABAD

2. Brief facts qua the issue are that assessee has filed Form 10AB, u/s 80G(5) of the Act on 29/09/2023. The date of registration/incorporation in this case is 02/11/2021 as per Form No. 10AB. The assessee had been granted order for provisional approval in Form No. 10AC issued on 10/03/2022, under Clause (iv) of first proviso to sub-section

SHRI DHORAJI NAGRIK SHARAFI AND GRAHAK SAHKARI MANDALI LIMITED,DHORAJI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(2)(1), RAJKOT

In the result, the assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes, in above terms

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.478/Rjt/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2018-19) (Physical Hearing) Shri Dhoraji Nagrik Sharafi & Vs. Income Tax Officer Grahak Sahkari Mandali Ltd. Ward – 1(2)(1), C/O. Sarda & Sarda, Sakar, 1St Rajkot. Floor, Dr. Radha – Krishnan Road, Opp. Rajkumar College, Rajkot- 360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaaad7775Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

section 119(2) (b) of the Income tax Act, to file the petition for condonation of delay before the learned

SHREE CHALALA VI KA SEVA SAHAKARI MANDALI LTD. ,AMRELI vs. THE ITO WARD 3(1)(4), RAJKOT-AMRELI., RAJKOT

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, A Ccountant Member & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 358/Rjt/2025 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: (2019-20) Shree Chalala Vi Ka Seva Sahakari Vs. The Ito Ward 3(1)(4), Mandali Ltd. Aayakar Bhavan, Race Course Ring Chalala Haveli Road, Road, Dhari Amreli - 365630 Rajkot - 360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aatas2273D (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Ms. Devina Patel, Ld. Ar Respondent By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav Ld. Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 27/08/2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 17/11/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per, Dinesh Mohan Sinha, Jm; Captioned Appeal Filed By Assessee Pertaining To Assessment Year 2019-20, Is Directed Against Order Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 By National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi/Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Dated 31/03/2025, Which In Turn Arises Out Of An Order Passed By The Assessing Officer U/S 143(1) Of The Act. 2. The Grounds Of Appeal Raised By The Assessee Are As Follows: - 1. The Learned Addl/Jcit (A)-1, Kolkata Erred In Confirming Action Of Cpc, Bangalore In Disallowing Claim Of Deduction Of Rs. 3,51,828/- U/S Sop Of The Act By Failing To Appreciate That Provisions Of Sec. 143(1)(A)(V) Do Not Provide For Denial Of Deduction U/S 80P Of The Act When The Return Of Income Is Not Filed Within Time Allowed U/S 139(1) Of The Act But U/S 139(4). 2. The Learned Addl/Jcit (A)-1, Kolkata Erred In Upholding Action Of The Cpc, Bangalore In Making Adjustment To The Returned Income Of The Appellant By Way Of Shree Chalala Vikas Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd.

section; (i) 80P(2)(a)(i) - Rs.8,06,042/- (ii) 80P(2)(a)(iv) - Rs.1,06,063/- (iii) 80P(2)(d) - Rs.3,51,828/- 4. Thereafter, the appellant was in receipt of communication for not granting deduction of Rs. 1263 933/- claimed in the return of income u/s 80P of the Act, stating that the assessee not filed Return within

SHRI PANCHTALAVADA SEVA SAHKARI MANDLI LIMITED,AMRELI vs. THE ITO WARD-3(1)(4), RAJKOT-AMRELI., AMRELI

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Shri Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.118/Rjt/2025 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Shri Panchtalavada Seva Sahkari Income Tax Officer, Ward – बनाम Mandali Ltd. 3(1)(4), Rajkot-Amreli, Panchtalavada, Amreli–3650220, Ganga Bhauvan, Keriya /Vs. Gujarat Road, Amreli–365 560 "थायीलेखासं /.जीआइआरसं . / Pan/Gir No.: Aaxas 4713 J (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (""यथ"/Respondent) "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee By : Ms. Devina Patel, Ld.Ar राज"व क" ओर से/Revenue By : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख /Date Of Hearing : 23/07/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 23/07/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Dr. Arjun Lal Saini, Am: Captioned Appeal Filed By The Assessee, Pertaining To Assessment Year 2019-20, Is Directed Against The Order Passed, Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’), By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal) Addl/Jcit(A)-2, Hyderabad Dated 06.01.2025, Which In Turn Arises, Out Of An Assessment Order Passed By The Centralized Processing Centre (Cpc)/Assessing Officer, U/S 143(1) Of The Act Dated 08.02.2021. 2. At The Outset, Learned Counsel Appearing On Behalf Of The Assessee Has Stated That The Assessee Wants To Withdraw The Present Appeal Because Condonation Of Delay For Filing Income Tax Return U/S 119(2)(B) Of The Act Has Been Condoned Sh. Pssm Ltd.

Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Hyderabad dated 06.01.2025, which in turn arises, out of an assessment order passed by the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC)/Assessing Officer, u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 08.02.2021. 2. At the outset, Learned Counsel

M/S. KALPATARU CREDIT CO-OPRATIVE SOCIETY,RAJKOT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 (1)(1), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the matter is set aside to the file of the assessing officer with the above directions

Bench: The Hearing Of Appeal.

section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short “the Act”. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- I.T.A No. 178/Rjt/2019 A.Y. 2009-10 Page No 2 M/s. Kalpataru Credit Co-operative Society vs. ITO “1. The grounds of appeal mentioned hereunder are without prejudice to one another. 2. The learned Commissioner of lncome

SHRI DHIRENDRA NARBHERAM SHETH,RAJKOT vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER- WARD 2 (3) (5), RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI WASEEM AHMED (Accountant Member), MS. MADHUMITA ROY (Judicial Member)

delay. Accordingly, we condone the same in pursuance to the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Cognizance for Extension of Limitation, In re reported in 125 taxmann.com 151 and proceed to adjudicate the issue on merit. 4. The only issue raised by the assessee is that the learned CIT-A erred in confirming the order

AMRAPAR SEVA SAHKARI MANDLI LTD,AMRAPAR vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1, RAJKOT, RAJKOT

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Dr. Arjun Lal Saini & Dr. Dinesh Mohan Sinhaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No. 324/Rjt/2025 Assessment Year: (2018-19) Amrapar Seva Sahkari Mandali Ltd. Vs. The Principal Commissioner Of C/O., Sarda & Sarda, Sakar, 1St Floor, Income Tax – 1, Dr. Radha Krishna Road, Opp. Aayakar Bhavan, Race Course Rajkumar Collage, Rajkot - 360001 Ring Road, Rajkot – 360001 "ायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaaaa0819N (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By : Shri Vimal Desai, Ld. Ar : Shri Sanjay Punglia, Ld. Cit(Dr) Respondent By Date Of Hearing : 18/03/2026 : 17/04/2026 Date Of Pronouncement

2)(d) of the Act, and allow the appeal of the assessee.” 7. The Ld.PCIT passed an order that it is a fit case for invoking section 263 of the Act as the twin conditions namely, (i) the order of the assessing officer sought to be revised is erroneous, and (ii) it is prejudicial to the interests of the revenue

SHRI ARJANBHAI DAYALJIBHAI PARMAR,JAMNAGAR vs. THE PR. CIT, JAMNAGAR, JAMNAGAR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri Siddhartha Nautiyalआयकर अपील सं./Ita No. 37/Rjt/2023 िनधा"रण वष" िनधा"रण वष"/Asstt. Years: 2017-2018 िनधा"रण िनधा"रण वष" वष"

section 263 of the Act. 3. At the outset, it was noticed that there was a delay in filing the appeal by the assessee for 282 days. The assessee has filed condonation petition stating that the appeal memo in requisite form in 3 sets was inadvertently sent to the Departmental Representative. As such the appeal was filed within the time