SHRI PANCHTALAVADA SEVA SAHKARI MANDLI LIMITED,AMRELI vs. THE ITO WARD-3(1)(4), RAJKOT-AMRELI., AMRELI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The assessee requested to withdraw the appeal because the condonation of delay for filing the income tax return under Section 119(2)(b) of the Act was granted. The Revenue's representative had no objection to the withdrawal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) concerning Assessment Year 2019-20. The appeal arose from an assessment order passed by the CPC/Assessing Officer. The assessee's counsel stated that they wished to withdraw the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal should be allowed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI & SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA
Assessment Year: 2019-20 Shri Panchtalavada Seva Sahkari Income Tax Officer, Ward – बनाम Mandali Ltd. 3(1)(4), Rajkot-Amreli, Panchtalavada, Amreli–3650220, Ganga Bhauvan, Keriya /Vs. Gujarat Road, Amreli–365 560 �थायीलेखासं /.जीआइआरसं . / PAN/GIR No.: AAXAS 4713 J (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (��यथ�/Respondent) �नधा�रती क� ओर से/Assessee by : Ms. Devina Patel, Ld.AR राज�व क� ओर से/Revenue by : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाई क� तार�ख /Date of Hearing : 23/07/2025 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement : 23/07/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Dr. ARJUN LAL SAINI, AM: Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to Assessment Year 2019-20, is directed against the order passed, under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) Addl/JCIT(A)-2, Hyderabad dated 06.01.2025, which in turn arises, out of an assessment order passed by the Centralized Processing Centre (CPC)/Assessing Officer, u/s 143(1) of the Act dated 08.02.2021.
At the outset, Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee has stated that the assessee wants to withdraw the present appeal because condonation of delay for filing income tax return u/s 119(2)(b) of the Act has been condoned by the Ld. Chief Commissioner of Income-tax, CCIT, Rajkot. The Ld. Senior Departmental Representative for the revenue submits that he has no objection, if the Bench permits the assessee to withdraw the present appeal.
Considering the request of the ld. AR, the appeal of assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
In the result, this appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.
More judgments on Section 119(2)(b)
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Pushpa Chandra Raj Singhvi Charitable… vs CIT(Exemption), Income Tax Appellate TribunaITA 8820/MUM/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Pratik Deepak Agarwal, Lonavla vs Assessing Officer, Ward 9(3), Akurdi, PuneITA 2227/PUN/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2025-2026
- Pushpa Bitan Friendship Society, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 1(4), Exemption, KolkataITA 2607/KOL/2026[2018-2019]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
- Tiong Woon Project & Contracting Pte Ltd… vs ACIT, Intl. Taxn. Circle-2(2), ChennaiITA 1883/CHNY/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed25 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jai Ram Gupta vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026
- Maa Baglamukhi Construction Thr Propriter Aryan Dhingra vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 22 Oct 2026
- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026