KRUPA VILAS GAU SEVA TRUST,KUTCH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal considered the arguments from both sides and the reliance on Supreme Court judgments regarding the genuineness of activities and the scope of inquiry by the Commissioner. The Tribunal's decision is not fully detailed in the provided excerpt, but it addresses the principles of condonation of delay and perversity of findings.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12A and approval under Section 80G. The CIT(Exemption) rejected the applications, finding that the trust's objectives and expenditures were not in consonance, particularly regarding the Gaushala operations and blanket distribution.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemption) was justified in rejecting the trust's application for registration and approval based on the perceived mismatch between objectives and activities, and whether the tribunal erred in condoning delay or making perverse findings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(10)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji3,926 citing167 ITR 471 · 1987 · SC
- Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy368 citing7 SCC 123 · 1998 · SC
- Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax137 citing31 ITR 28 · 1957 · SC
- CIT v. Daulatram Rawatmull97 citing53 ITR 574 · 1964 · SC
- CIT v. Parma Nand81 citing135 Taxmann 100 · 2004 · HC
- Udhavdas Kewalram v. CIT59 citing66 ITR 462 · 1967 · SC
- Ram Nath Sahu & Others v. Gobardhan Sao and Others43 citing3 SCC 195 · 2002
- Esthuri Aswathiah v. CIT, Mysore29 citing66 ITR 478 · 1967 · SC · Read judgment
- DCIT(Exemption) v. Vishwa Jagriti Mission17 citing30 Taxmann.com 41 · 2013 · HC · Read judgment
- 266 ITR 255/135 Taxman 100 (Delhi) and (ii) CIT v. ITOCHU Corpn11 citing139 Taxmann 348 · 2004 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI & SHRI DINESH MOHAN SINHA
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
Per, Dr. A. L. Saini, AM Captioned two appeals filed by the assessee, are directed against the separate orders passed
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- D vs Welfare Foundation, Thanevs.Income Tax…ITA 6191/MUM/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Chandan Kumar Bathual vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Cuttack-Iii Range, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Manoranjan Sadangi vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, Gopalpur Range, GanjamOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Bijaya Kumar Parekh vs. State Tax Officer, CT And GST Balangir Circle, BalangirOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Puspanjali Bhuyan vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026