BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

49 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 220(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Patna468Chennai101Mumbai72Delhi71Pune57Ahmedabad56Kolkata49Jaipur37Bangalore34Panaji30Visakhapatnam27Hyderabad24Indore14Nagpur13Cochin12Guwahati11Lucknow11Chandigarh9Cuttack7Raipur7Agra6Dehradun5Surat4Rajkot3Amritsar3SC2Varanasi2Ranchi1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 14884Section 14759Addition to Income31Section 6823Limitation/Time-bar22Section 69A20Section 13218Section 143(3)18Condonation of Delay

M/S PREMIER IRRIGATION ADRITEC (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. ACIT, CIR-11(1), KOLKATA , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 387/KOL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg & Shri Girish Agrawal

Section 2(24)Section 250Section 3Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

condoned. Ground No.1 & 2 – Vide Ground Nos.1 & 2, the assessee has 4. agitated the confirmation of addition of Rs.10,10,774/- made by the Assessing Officer invoking the provisions to section 43B of the Act for delay in depositing employees contribution to provident fund and employees state insurance. 5. Heard both the sides. At the outset, we note that

Showing 1–20 of 49 · Page 1 of 3

17
Section 44A16
Section 15315
Deduction10

ACIT, CIRCLE-7.1, KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. ITC LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 745/KOL/2024[1992-1993]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 May 2025AY 1992-1993

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 151Section 153Section 80H

220/-. While framing the assessment the assessee was allowed deduction u/s 80HHD and 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) at ₹11,69,99,014/- and ₹11,73,61,242/- respectively qua which the assessee had filed audited report in form no.10CCAD and 10CCAC respectively. The assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of cigarettes

ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1), KOLKATA, AAYAKAR BHAWAN vs. ITC LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 744/KOL/2024[1993-1994]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 May 2025AY 1993-1994

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 151Section 153Section 80H

220/-. While framing the assessment the assessee was allowed deduction u/s 80HHD and 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) at ₹11,69,99,014/- and ₹11,73,61,242/- respectively qua which the assessee had filed audited report in form no.10CCAD and 10CCAC respectively. The assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of cigarettes

ITC LIMITED, KOLKATA. ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT,CIR-7(1),KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1318/KOL/2023[1993-94]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 May 2025AY 1993-94

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 151Section 153Section 80H

220/-. While framing the assessment the assessee was allowed deduction u/s 80HHD and 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) at ₹11,69,99,014/- and ₹11,73,61,242/- respectively qua which the assessee had filed audited report in form no.10CCAD and 10CCAC respectively. The assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of cigarettes

ACIT, CIRCLE-7(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. HI TECH SYSTEMS AND SERVICES LIMITED, KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and both the appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1318/KOL/2024[2022-2023]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata06 Jan 2025AY 2022-2023

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar, Am & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey, Jm

For Appellant: Shri J.P. Khaitan &For Respondent: Shri Subhendu Datta, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 151Section 153Section 80H

220/-. While framing the assessment the assessee was allowed deduction u/s 80HHD and 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) at ₹11,69,99,014/- and ₹11,73,61,242/- respectively qua which the assessee had filed audited report in form no.10CCAD and 10CCAC respectively. The assessee is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of cigarettes

ITC LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIR-7(1), KOLKATA. , KOLKATA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed and both\nthe appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1343/KOL/2023[1992-93]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 May 2025AY 1992-93
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 148(2)Section 153Section 80H

220/-. While framing the assessment the assessee was\nallowed deduction u/s 80HHD and 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961\n(the Act) at ₹11,69,99,014/- and ₹11,73,61,242/- respectively qua\nwhich the assessee had filed audited report in form no.10CCAD and\n10CCAC respectively. The assessee is engaged in the business of\nmanufacturing and trading

FARHAN AHMED,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 31(1), KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4/KOL/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 Jul 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Vice-(Kz) I.T.A. No. 4/Kol/2025 Assessment Year: 2015-2016 Farhan Ahmed,……………………………..………Appellant Tower 4, Flat 81, Sunflowers Garden, 74, Topsia Road, South Topsia, Kolkata-700046, West Bengal [Pan:Bmrpa2975G] -Vs.- Income Tax Officer,……………………………..Respondent Ward-31(1), Kolkata, 10B, Middleton Row, Kolkata-700071

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 249(2)Section 68

section 249(2) of the Act and there was no sufficient cause for condonation of the delay. He further submitted that the assessee was not aware of the date of hearing before the ld. CIT(Appeals). Therefore, the assessee was not in a position to appear before the ld. CIT(Appeals). Due to that, the ld. CIT(Appeals) dismissed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1560/KOL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

condone the respective delays in filing the\nappeals by the revenue for respective assessment years under\nconsideration and the appeals of the revenue are admitted for hearing\nalong with other appeals.\n29. First we shall decide appeal of the revenue in ITA\nNo.1560/Kol/2025 for A.Y.2019-2020 and findings of the same shall be\napplied to the other appeals. The grounds raised

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CC - 3(3),, KOLKATA

ITA 1195/KOL/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2017-2018
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

condone the respective delays in filing the\nappeals by the revenue for respective assessment years under\nconsideration and the appeals of the revenue are admitted for hearing\nalong with other appeals.\n29. First we shall decide appeal of the revenue in ITA\nNo.1560/Kol/2025 for A.Y.2019-2020 and findings of the same shall be\napplied to the other appeals. The grounds raised

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), , KOLKATA

ITA 1197/KOL/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2020-2021
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

condone the respective delays in filing the\nappeals by the revenue for respective assessment years under\nconsideration and the appeals of the revenue are admitted for hearing\nalong with other appeals.\n29. First we shall decide appeal of the revenue in ITA\nNo.1560/Kol/2025 for A.Y.2019-2020 and findings of the same shall be\napplied to the other appeals. The grounds raised

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), , KOLKATA

ITA 1194/KOL/2025[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2016-2017
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

condone the respective delays in filing the\nappeals by the revenue for respective assessment years under\nconsideration and the appeals of the revenue are admitted for hearing\nalong with other appeals.\n29. First we shall decide appeal of the revenue in ITA\nNo.1560/Kol/2025 for A.Y.2019-2020 and findings of the same shall be\napplied to the other appeals. The grounds raised

D.C.I.T., CC - 3(1),, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1541/KOL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

condone the respective delays in filing the\nappeals by the revenue for respective assessment years under\nconsideration and the appeals of the revenue are admitted for hearing\nalong with other appeals.\n29. First we shall decide appeal of the revenue in ITA\nNo.1560/Kol/2025 for A.Y.2019-2020 and findings of the same shall be\napplied to the other appeals. The grounds raised

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), , KOLKATA

ITA 1198/KOL/2025[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2021-2022
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

condone the respective delays in filing the\nappeals by the revenue for respective assessment years under\nconsideration and the appeals of the revenue are admitted for hearing\nalong with other appeals.\n29. First we shall decide appeal of the revenue in ITA\nNo.1560/Kol/2025 for A.Y.2019-2020 and findings of the same shall be\napplied to the other appeals. The grounds raised

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3.1, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1436/KOL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2016-17
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

condone the respective delays in filing the\nappeals by the revenue for respective assessment years under\nconsideration and the appeals of the revenue are admitted for hearing\nalong with other appeals.\n29. First we shall decide appeal of the revenue in ITA\nNo.1560/Kol/2025 for A.Y.2019-2020 and findings of the same shall be\napplied to the other appeals. The grounds raised

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1561/KOL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2020-21
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

condone the respective delays in filing the\nappeals by the revenue for respective assessment years under\nconsideration and the appeals of the revenue are admitted for hearing\nalong with other appeals.\n29. First we shall decide appeal of the revenue in ITA\nNo.1560/Kol/2025 for A.Y.2019-2020 and findings of the same shall be\napplied to the other appeals. The grounds raised

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), , KOLKATA

ITA 931/KOL/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2019-2020
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

condone the respective delays in filing the\nappeals by the revenue for respective assessment years under\nconsideration and the appeals of the revenue are admitted for hearing\nalong with other appeals.\n29. First we shall decide appeal of the revenue in ITA\nNo.1560/Kol/2025 for A.Y.2019-2020 and findings of the same shall be\napplied to the other appeals. The grounds raised

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(1),, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1591/KOL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2021-22
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

condone the respective delays in filing the\nappeals by the revenue for respective assessment years under\nconsideration and the appeals of the revenue are admitted for hearing\nalong with other appeals.\n29. First we shall decide appeal of the revenue in ITA\nNo.1560/Kol/2025 for A.Y.2019-2020 and findings of the same shall be\napplied to the other appeals. The grounds raised

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1515/KOL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

condone the respective delays in filing the\nappeals by the revenue for respective assessment years under\nconsideration and the appeals of the revenue are admitted for hearing\nalong with other appeals.\n29. First we shall decide appeal of the revenue in ITA\nNo.1560/Kol/2025 for A.Y.2019-2020 and findings of the same shall be\napplied to the other appeals. The grounds raised

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), KOLKATA

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and\nappeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1196/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2018-2019
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

condone the respective delays in filing the\nappeals by the revenue for respective assessment years under\nconsideration and the appeals of the revenue are admitted for hearing\nalong with other appeals.\n29. First we shall decide appeal of the revenue in ITA\nNo.1560/Kol/2025 for A.Y.2019-2020 and findings of the same shall be\napplied to the other appeals. The grounds raised

COAL EMPLOYEES COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD 36(1), , KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 302/KOL/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata22 May 2025AY 2019-2020

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey]

Section 143(1)Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(f)

delay is hereby condoned. 3 I.T.A. No. 302/Kol/2025 Assessment Year: 2019-20 Coal Employees Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. 3. Brief facts of the case of the assessee is that the assessee filed return of income declaring total income at Nil. The assessee claimed deduction u/s 80P of the Act to the tune of Rs. 97,78,220/-. The return