DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were initiated based on invalid notices and that the additions for alleged undisclosed purchases were made on mere surmises and conjectures without independent verification. The Tribunal also found that the addition for bogus purchases from Reeja Trading Private Ltd. was made without proper inquiry.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, engaged in manufacturing and trading of iron and steel products, faced reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 based on a search operation. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for alleged undisclosed purchases of coal from the 'Anup Majee Group' and bogus purchases from 'Reeja Trading Private Ltd.', relying on seized documents and third-party reports.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147 and Section 148, and the validity of additions made for alleged undisclosed and bogus purchases without sufficient independent evidence and verification by the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- (Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd.696 citing11 SCC 312 · 2019
- PCIT v. Swati Bajaj443 citing288 Taxmann 403 · 2022 · HC · Read judgment
- Vijay Trading Co. v. ITO119 citing388 ITR 377 · 2016 · HC
- Koteshwara Rao v. DCIT63 citing64 Taxmann.com 159 · 2015 · ITAT
- PCIT v. Batliboi Environmental Engineering Ltd.47 citing446 ITR 238 · 2022 · HC
- PCIT v. Subarna Rice Mill30 citing96 Taxmann.com 286 · 2018 · HC
- Tirupati Construction Co. v. ITO25 citing165 Taxmann.com 165 · 2024 · HC
- Jagjit Singh v. DCIT19 citing164 Taxmann.com 324 · 2024 · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY
Per Bench: These are the cross appeals filed by the assessee and revenue against the separate orders passed by the CIT(A), Kolkata-21, 28.02.2025
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026