DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the reassessment proceedings were initiated based on alleged documents and statements from third parties without independent verification by the Assessing Officer. The AO's reliance on unexamined material and lack of opportunity for cross-examination violated principles of natural justice.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, engaged in manufacturing and trading of iron and steel products, was subject to a search operation. Subsequently, the case was re-opened, and a notice under Section 148 was issued, leading to additions based on alleged undisclosed purchases. The assessee contested the validity of the notice and the additions made.
What were the issues?
The key issues were the validity of the reassessment proceedings initiated under Section 147/148 based on uncorroborated third-party information and the AO's failure to conduct independent inquiries and provide opportunities for cross-examination.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- (Central)-1 v. NRA Iron & Steel (P) Ltd.696 citing11 SCC 312 · 2019
- PCIT v. Swati Bajaj443 citing288 Taxmann 403 · 2022 · HC · Read judgment
- Vijay Trading Co. v. ITO119 citing388 ITR 377 · 2016 · HC
- Koteshwara Rao v. DCIT63 citing64 Taxmann.com 159 · 2015 · ITAT
- PCIT v. Batliboi Environmental Engineering Ltd.47 citing446 ITR 238 · 2022 · HC
- PCIT v. Subarna Rice Mill30 citing96 Taxmann.com 286 · 2018 · HC
- Tirupati Construction Co. v. ITO25 citing165 Taxmann.com 165 · 2024 · HC
- Jagjit Singh v. DCIT19 citing164 Taxmann.com 324 · 2024 · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, D BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY
Per Bench: These are the cross appeals filed by the assessee and revenue against the separate orders passed by the CIT(A), Kolkata-21, 28.02.2025 & 13.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026