BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

53 results for “bogus purchases”+ Section 56(2)(vii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi567Mumbai401Jaipur175Karnataka100Chandigarh70Ahmedabad67Bangalore62Chennai62Cochin57Kolkata53Indore40Calcutta35Amritsar34Surat29Hyderabad26Guwahati25Rajkot21Jodhpur16Cuttack16Pune14Nagpur13Visakhapatnam12Lucknow7Raipur5Orissa2Panaji2Ranchi2Allahabad2Agra1Patna1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 14890Section 14773Addition to Income49Section 26342Section 6841Section 143(3)27Section 13216Section 143(2)14Section 25013

SATYAM SUREKA ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIR-3(3), KOLKATA

In the result, all the appeals of the different assessees are partly allowed

ITA 152/KOL/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Rajesh Kumar&Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey] I.T.(S.S).A. No. 13 /Kol/2025 Assessment Years: 2013-14 Satyam Sureka Vs. Dcit, Central Circle-3(3), Kolkata

Section 115BSection 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 56(2)Section 68

vii) as income from other sources. iii) That the Hon’ble CIT(A) erred in law and on facts in confirming Rs. 6,31,000/- as unexplained money u/s 68 of the Act despite the said amount having already been considered in the total income of the appellant, and further erred in upholding the application of section 115BBE

Showing 1–20 of 53 · Page 1 of 3

Unexplained Cash Credit12
Disallowance11
Revision u/s 2639

ITO, WARD - 23(2) , HOOGHLY vs. SHRI NAVARATAN DUGAR , HOOGHLY

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2255/KOL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata05 Feb 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S.Godara, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.2255/Kol/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year:2014-15)

For Appellant: Shri Baij Nath Singh, JCITFor Respondent: Shri Manish Tiwari, FCA
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 56(2)(vii)Section 64Section 68

56(2)(vii)(b) read with section 64(1A) of the I.T. Act, 1961. 3. That the appellant reserves the right to amend, alter or add to any ground(s) of appeal before or at the time of hearing of the appeal. 3. Ground no. 1 raised by the Revenue relates to addition of Rs. 2

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-4(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA vs. MIRA BIBI, MURSHIDABAD

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 727/KOL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata20 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Rajesh Kumar Mishra &For Respondent: Shri S.B. Chakraborthy, DR
Section 139(1)Section 148Section 68

bogus\nand the assessee's own money. Hence, the said amount was added back to the total\nincome of the assessee u/s 68 of the Act.\n5.2.2. In the Income Tax Act, 1961, the section deals with taxability of gifts is section\n56(2). More specifically, if the gift was given in the period 01.10.2009 to 31.03.2017,\nthe striking section

M/S EVAN VINIMAY PVT. LTD.,AGRA vs. PR, C.I.T.-4, KOLKATA

ITA 235/KOL/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 68

vii) List of shareholders viii) Details of bank accounts 21. The Second AO acknowledges in his order sheet as on 19.5.2016 that he had issued summons u/s 131 of the Act and pursuant to which thirteen (9) share subscribing companies respective Directors had appeared before him on 1.06.2016, and they were examined along with their respective books of accounts

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1560/KOL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2019-20
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

2 & 3 in respect of alleged transaction of purchase of\ncoal with Anup Majhee and addition made thereto for different\n assessment years as follows:-\n Assessment Year\n2016-17\n2017-18\n2018-19\n2019-20\n2020-21\n2021-22\nAmount

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CC - 3(3),, KOLKATA

ITA 1195/KOL/2025[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2017-2018
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

2 & 3 in respect of alleged transaction of purchase of\ncoal with Anup Majhee and addition made thereto for different\n assessment years as follows:-\n Assessment Year\n2016-17\n2017-18\n2018-19\n2019-20\n2020-21\n2021-22\nAmount

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), , KOLKATA

ITA 1197/KOL/2025[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2020-2021
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

2 & 3 in respect of alleged transaction of purchase of\ncoal with Anup Majhee and addition made thereto for different\n assessment years as follows:-\n Assessment Year\nAmount (in Rs.)\n2016-17\n2,02,84,550/-\n2017-18\n3,70,00,000/-\n2018-19\n25,14,67,500/-\n2019-20\n29,93,22,967/-\n2020

M/S BRIDHI DISTRIBUTORS PVT. LTD.,AGRA vs. PR.CIT-4, KOLKATA

ITA 234/KOL/2020[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata07 Jan 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 68

vii) List of shareholders viii) Details of bank accounts 21. The Second AO acknowledges in his order sheet as on 19.5.2016 that he had issued summons u/s 131 of the Act and pursuant to which thirteen (13) share subscribing companies respective Directors had appeared before him on 30/31.05.2016, and they were examined along with their respective books of 18 Bridhi

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), , KOLKATA

ITA 1194/KOL/2025[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2016-2017
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

2 & 3 in respect of alleged transaction of purchase of\ncoal with Anup Majhee and addition made thereto for different\n assessment years as follows:-\n Assessment Year\nAmount (in Rs.)\n2016-17\n2,02,84,550/-\n2017-18\n3,70,00,000/-\n2018-19\n25,14,67,500/-\n2019-20\n29,93,22,967/\n2020

D.C.I.T., CC - 3(1),, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1541/KOL/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2018-19
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

2 & 3 in respect of alleged transaction of purchase of\ncoal with Anup Majhee and addition made thereto for different\n assessment years as follows:-\n Assessment Year\nAmount (in Rs.)\n2016-17\n2,02,84,550/-\n2017-18\n3,70,00,000/-\n2018-19\n25,14,67,500/-\n2019-20\n29,93,22,967/\n22,00,38,030/-\n2020

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD.,,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), , KOLKATA

ITA 931/KOL/2025[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2019-2020
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

2 & 3 in respect of alleged transaction of purchase of\ncoal with Anup Majhee and addition made thereto for different\n assessment years as follows:-\n Assessment Year\nAmount (in Rs.)\n2016-17\n2,02,84,550/-\n2017-18\n3,70,00,000/-\n2018-19\n25,14,67,500/-\n2019-20\n29,93,22,967/\n22,00,38,030/-\n2020

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1515/KOL/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2017-18
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

2 & 3 in respect of alleged transaction of purchase of\ncoal with Anup Majhee and addition made thereto for different\n assessment years as follows:-\n Assessment Year\n2016-17\n2017-18\n2018-19\n2019-20\n2020-21\n2021-22\nAmount

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), , KOLKATA

ITA 1198/KOL/2025[2021-2022]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2021-2022
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

2 & 3 in respect of alleged transaction of purchase of\ncoal with Anup Majhee and addition made thereto for different\n assessment years as follows:-\n Assessment Year\nAmount (in Rs.)\n2016-17\n2,02,84,550/-\n2017-18\n3,70,00,000/-\n2018-19\n25,14,67,500/-\n2019-20\n29,93,22,967/\n2020

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3.1, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1436/KOL/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2016-17
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

2 & 3 in respect of alleged transaction of purchase of\ncoal with Anup Majhee and addition made thereto for different\n assessment years as follows:-\n Assessment Year\nAmount (in Rs.)\n2016-17\n2,02,84,550/-\n2017-18\n3,70,00,000/-\n2018-19\n25,14,67,500/-\n2019-20\n29,93,22,967/\n2020

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(1),, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1591/KOL/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2021-22
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

2 & 3 in respect of alleged transaction of purchase of\ncoal with Anup Majhee and addition made thereto for different\n assessment years as follows:-\n Assessment Year\nAmount (in Rs.)\n2016-17\n2,02,84,550/-\n2017-18\n3,70,00,000/-\n2018-19\n25,14,67,500/-\n2019-20\n29,93,22,967/\n22,00,38,030/-\n2020

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA vs. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LIMITED, KOLKATA

ITA 1561/KOL/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2020-21
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

2 & 3 in respect of alleged transaction of purchase of\ncoal with Anup Majhee and addition made thereto for different\n assessment years as follows:-\n Assessment Year\nAmount (in Rs.)\n2016-17\n2,02,84,550/-\n2017-18\n3,70,00,000/-\n2018-19\n25,14,67,500/-\n2019-20\n29,93,22,967/\n2020

M/S. SHAKAMBHARI ISPAT & POWER LTD., ,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), KOLKATA

Appeals of the assessee are partly allowed and\nappeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 1196/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata02 Jan 2026AY 2018-2019
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 147Section 148

2 & 3 in respect of alleged transaction of purchase of\ncoal with Anup Majhee and addition made thereto for different\n assessment years as follows:-\n Assessment Year\nAmount (in Rs.)\n2016-17\n2,02,84,550/-\n2017-18\n3,70,00,000/-\n2018-19\n25,14,67,500/-\n2019-20\n29,93,22,967/-\n2020

AMRITRASHI INFRA(P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. PR.C.I.T.-4, KOLKATA

ITA 838/KOL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 Aug 2020AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap(Kz) &Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm] Assessment Year: 2012-13 Amritrashi Infra Private Ltd. Vs. Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax- (Pan: Aakca2544E) 4, Kolkata.

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 68

vii) List of shareholders viii) Details of bank accounts 26. The AO also acknowledges in his re-assessment / second assessment order that he has examined the aforesaid details and thereafter issued notices u/s. 133(6) of the Act to all 18 Amritrashi Infra Private Limited,AY- 2012-13 the shareholders and directed them to prove their identity, genuineness and creditworthiness

M/S GOODPOINT STOCKIST PVT LTD,KOLKATA vs. PCIT-4, KOLKATA

ITA 263/KOL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata11 Mar 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm &Shrigirishagrawal, Am]

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 68

vii) share holders list (viii) Bank account details. The second AO has acknowledged in his reassessment order that he has examined the details furnished before him. And that he has verified the identity, creditworthiness &genuinety of share subscribers as well as the source of fund. And he has recorded in his re-assessment/second assessment order that ShriVinay Kumar Singh

SMT. SUCHARITA KAR,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WARD-55(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2239/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata14 Dec 2016AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri M.Balaganesh & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Ravi

Section 143(2)Section 37(1)Section 40Section 41Section 41(1)Section 56(2)(vii)

56(2)(vii) of the Act is unjust and uncalled for .The contention of the assessing officer is opposed to requirement of law and bad in law. 5. For that disallowance of 50% expenses under the head Sales Promotion amounting to Rs.88,245/- u/s 37(1) of the Act is without having any basis, unjustified and uncalled