BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

10 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 268Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka43Kolkata20Chennai10Lucknow10Telangana2Hyderabad2Jaipur2Calcutta2Mumbai1Pune1SC1Indore1

Key Topics

Condonation of Delay10Section 268A(1)8Section 14A8Limitation/Time-bar4Section 14A(2)2Disallowance2

ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 2, MADURAI vs. TVS LOGISTICS SERVICES LTD., MADURAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as

ITA 1927/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.2906/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Tvs Logistics Services Ltd. Income Tax, 10, Jawahar Road, Chokkikulam, Corporate Circle-2 Madurai-625 002. Madurai. Pan: Aacct 1412E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.1927/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Vs M/S. Tvs Logistics Services The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ltd. Corporate Circle-2 10,Jawahar Road, Madurai. Chokkikulam, Madurai-625 002. Pan: Aacct 1412E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.G.Johnson, Addl.CIT
Section 14ASection 14A(2)

delay in filing of appeal is condoned and appeal filed by the assessee is admitted for adjudication. 6. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in providing logistic service filed its return of income for the assessment year 2013-14 on 29.11.2013 declaring total income of Rs. 1,75,71,40,470/-. The case

T vs. LOGISTICS SERVICES LIMITED,MADURAIVS.DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 2, MADURAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as

ITA 2906/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.2906/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Tvs Logistics Services Ltd. Income Tax, 10, Jawahar Road, Chokkikulam, Corporate Circle-2 Madurai-625 002. Madurai. Pan: Aacct 1412E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.1927/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Vs M/S. Tvs Logistics Services The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ltd. Corporate Circle-2 10,Jawahar Road, Madurai. Chokkikulam, Madurai-625 002. Pan: Aacct 1412E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.G.Johnson, Addl.CIT
Section 14ASection 14A(2)

delay in filing of appeal is condoned and appeal filed by the assessee is admitted for adjudication. 6. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in providing logistic service filed its return of income for the assessment year 2013-14 on 29.11.2013 declaring total income of Rs. 1,75,71,40,470/-. The case

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI vs. CONSUL NEOWATT POWER SOLUTION PVT. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue and the cross

ITA 1291/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Mar 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 268A(1)

delay in filing of cross 3 & C.O.No.103/Chny/2018 objection is condoned and cross objection filed by the assessee is admitted for adjudication. 5. It is stated before us that the tax effect in the above appeal is less than Rs. 50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(4), CHENNAI vs. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for the relevant

ITA 1766/CHNY/2017[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai02 Dec 2020AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos. 1764, 1766 & 1767/Chny/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2006-07 & 2009-10) The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs Mr. Arvind Srinivasan Income Tax, Central Circle-3(4), 61, Oliver Road, Mylapore, Chennai-600 034. Chennai-600 004. Pan: Adcpa0371R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) ""यथ"/Respondent/

For Appellant: Mr. B.S.Purushotham, CAFor Respondent: 02.12.2020
Section 268A(1)

delay in filing of appeal is condoned and appeals filed by the assessee are admitted for adjudication. 3. It is stated before us that the tax effect in the above appeals is less than Rs. 50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(4), CHENNAI vs. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for the relevant

ITA 1764/CHNY/2017[Arvind Srinivasan]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai02 Dec 2020

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos. 1764, 1766 & 1767/Chny/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2006-07 & 2009-10) The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs Mr. Arvind Srinivasan Income Tax, Central Circle-3(4), 61, Oliver Road, Mylapore, Chennai-600 034. Chennai-600 004. Pan: Adcpa0371R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) ""यथ"/Respondent/

For Appellant: Mr. B.S.Purushotham, CAFor Respondent: 02.12.2020
Section 268A(1)

delay in filing of appeal is condoned and appeals filed by the assessee are admitted for adjudication. 3. It is stated before us that the tax effect in the above appeals is less than Rs. 50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(4), CHENNAI vs. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for the relevant

ITA 1767/CHNY/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai02 Dec 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos. 1764, 1766 & 1767/Chny/2017 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08, 2006-07 & 2009-10) The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs Mr. Arvind Srinivasan Income Tax, Central Circle-3(4), 61, Oliver Road, Mylapore, Chennai-600 034. Chennai-600 004. Pan: Adcpa0371R (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) ""यथ"/Respondent/

For Appellant: Mr. B.S.Purushotham, CAFor Respondent: 02.12.2020
Section 268A(1)

delay in filing of appeal is condoned and appeals filed by the assessee are admitted for adjudication. 3. It is stated before us that the tax effect in the above appeals is less than Rs. 50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2, MADURAI vs. ADSORBENT CARBONS PRIVATE LIMITED, TUTICORIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue and Cross

ITA 2998/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Sept 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.2998/Chny/2018 & C.O.No.8/ Chny/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs M/S. Adsorbent Carbons Pvt. Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Ltd., Madurai. C-92, Sipcot Industrial Complex, Tuticorin-628 008. Pan:Aabcv 0223A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) ""यथ"/Respondent/ Cross Objector : Mr. J.Pavithran Kumar , Jcit अपीलाथ" क" ओरसे/ Appellant By : Mr. H.Yeshwanth Kumar, C.A ""यथ" क" ओरसे/Respondent By : 29.09.2020 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 29.09.2020 घोषणा क"तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R

For Appellant: Mr. H.Yeshwanth Kumar, C.A ""For Respondent: 29.09.2020
Section 268A(1)

section 268A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 comes into play wherein, the monetary limit for filing C.O.No.8/Chny/2019 the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of the reducing the tax litigation. In the said circular, it is stated that in cases where

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(4), CHENNAI vs. CHANDINI SRINIVASAN, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for the relevant assessment years are dismissed

ITA 1771/CHNY/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai02 Dec 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Mr. S.Bharath, CITFor Respondent: Mr. B.S. Purushotham, C.A
Section 268A(1)

delay of four days in filing of the appeal stands condoned and all the appeals are admitted for adjudication. 3. It is stated before us that the tax effect in the above appeals is less than Rs. 50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(4), CHENNAI vs. CHANDINI SRINIVASAN, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for the relevant assessment years are dismissed

ITA 1772/CHNY/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai02 Dec 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Mr. S.Bharath, CITFor Respondent: Mr. B.S. Purushotham, C.A
Section 268A(1)

delay of four days in filing of the appeal stands condoned and all the appeals are admitted for adjudication. 3. It is stated before us that the tax effect in the above appeals is less than Rs. 50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(4), CHENNAI vs. CHANDINI SRINIVASAN, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for the relevant assessment years are dismissed

ITA 1773/CHNY/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai02 Dec 2020AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

For Appellant: Mr. S.Bharath, CITFor Respondent: Mr. B.S. Purushotham, C.A
Section 268A(1)

delay of four days in filing of the appeal stands condoned and all the appeals are admitted for adjudication. 3. It is stated before us that the tax effect in the above appeals is less than Rs. 50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise