ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(4), CHENNAI vs. CHANDINI SRINIVASAN, CHENNAI

All the appeals filed by the Revenue are delayed by four days for which, the Revenue has filed a petition for condonation of delay, to which: the learned Counsel for the Assessee has not raised any serious

It is stated before us that the tax effect in the above appeals is less than Rs. 50 lakhs and therefore, the Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in exercise of its power vested under section 268A(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 comes into play wherein, the monetary limit for filing the appeal by the Revenue before the ITAT and various High Courts as well as Apex Court are revised with an object of the reducing the tax litigation. In the said circular, it is stated that in cases where the tax effect in the appeals to be filed before the Appellate Tribunal does not exceed Rs.50 lakhs appeals should not be filed. Thus, taking note of CBDT Circular No. 17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019 and considering the fact that the tax effect in the instant appeal is less than Rs. 50 lakhs, the present appeals deserves to be dismissed as not pressed / not maintainable. However, we make it clear that the issues raised in the instant appeal is left open to be examined in the appropriate proceedings, if arises, in future. At the same time, we also make it clear that if the appeals fall in any of the exceptions referred to in the above said CBDT Circular, the Revenue is at liberty to move an application for

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue for the relevant assessment years are dismissed. Order pronounced on 2nd December, 2020 in Chennai.