← All Phrases

“block assessment”

Search & SeizureSection 158BCSection 158BC4,282 judgments

The decision most relied on for block assessment is CIT v. RRJ Securities Ltd. (380 ITR 612), cited in 689 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on block assessment

CIT v. RRJ Securities Ltd.
380 ITR 612 · 2016 · High Court
689
citing judgments

Completed assessments can be interfered with under Section 153A or 153C only on the basis of incriminating material unearthed during the search, necessitating a direct correlation between the discovered material and the power to assess or reopen concluded assessments.

SSP Aviation Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
346 ITR 177 · 2012 · High Court
308
citing judgments

For a non-searched person under Section 153C, the relevant six assessment years are counted backward from the assessment year in which the search was conducted, as prescribed by the first proviso to Section 153C(1).

PCIT v. Ojjus Medicare (P) Ltd.
465 ITR 101 · 2024 · High Court
277
citing judgments

For assessments under Section 153C, the commencement point for calculating the six or ten assessment year block period is the date of issuing the Section 153C notice, or the date of the satisfaction note/handing over of books, as clarified by the first proviso to Section 153C(1).

Manish Maheshwari v. ACIT
289 ITR 341 · 2007 · Supreme Court
237
citing judgments

A block assessment under Chapter XIV-B of the Income-tax Act requires a prior search conducted under Section 132 or a requisition of documents/assets under Section 132A. This fundamental condition precedent applies to block assessments, including those concerning other persons under Section 158BD.

CIT v. Jasjit Singh
155 Taxmann.com 155 · 2023 · Supreme Court
235
citing judgments

For assessments under Section 153C concerning a non-searched person, the relevant date for calculating the block of assessment years is the date on which the jurisdictional Assessing Officer of that person assumes possession of the seized material, not the date of the original search. This date determines the look-back period for reopening assessments under Section 153A read with 153C.

Rishabchand Bhansali v. Dy. CIT
267 ITR 577 · 2004 · High Court
202
citing judgments

The previous approval required for assessment orders under provisions like Section 158BG or Section 153D is an administrative power and an internal matter, not deciding the assessee's rights. A mere irregularity in granting such administrative approval does not vitiate the assessment order.

P.R. Metrani v. CIT
287 ITR 209 · 2006 · Supreme Court
187
citing judgments

Section 132 of the Income Tax Act is a self-contained code governing search and seizure operations. The books of accounts, documents, valuables, or statements recorded during a search can be used as evidence in any subsequent proceedings under the Act, and the section outlines the conditions for issuing warrants of authorization.

CIT (Central) v. Kabul Chawla
2015 SCC OnLine DEL 11555 · 2015 · Reported
186
citing judgments

No addition can be made in respect of a completed assessment in the absence of incriminating material, especially when considering the object and purpose of Section 153-A.

Judgments citing block assessment

Tanish Projects P. Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cen Cir 2(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of Revenue are dismissed and the appeals of assessee are dismissed as infructuous

ITA 2118/MUM/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Aug 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri G Manjunatha, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita Nos. 2117 & 2118 /Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) Tanish Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. & …… (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) Tanish Projects Pvt. Ltd. 61/62, Gaya Buildings, 4Th Floor, 109, Y.M. Road, Masjid (West), Mumbai-400 003 Vs. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …… (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) Central Circle-2(2), Mumbai स्थायी लेखा िं./Pan No. Aacct8448C Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 1921 & 1928/Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …… (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) Central Circle-2(2), Pratishtha Bhavan, 8 Th Floor, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 020 Vs. Tanish Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. & …… (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) Tanish Projects Pvt. Ltd. 61/62, Gaya Buildings, 4Th Floor, 109, Y.M. Road, Masjid (West), Mumbai-400 003 अपीलाथी की ओर े / Appellant By : Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, Ar प्रत्यथी की ओर े / Respondent By : Shri R Manjunatha Swamy, Cit-Dr ुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 08-08-2018 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 24-08-2018

For Appellant: Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, ARFor Respondent: Shri
Section 131Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

returns which were the subject-matter of regular assessment. The same ought to have been assessed in the regular assessment and not in the block assessment." 10.8 The Hon'ble Mumbai ITAT in the case of Deepak Agarwal vs. ACIT (2014) 40 CCH 0311 Mum. Trib. decided that "the assessment ... decided that "Bank account having been disclosed to the Department, addition on account of entries appearing in this account cannot be made in the block assessment'. In view of the above stated judicial decisions, it is held that the regular books of accounts found and seized during search cannot

Tanish Estate Developers P. Ltd, Mumbai vs. DCIT Cen Cir 2(2), Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of Revenue are dismissed and the appeals of assessee are dismissed as infructuous

ITA 2117/MUM/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Aug 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri G Manjunatha, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita Nos. 2117 & 2118 /Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) Tanish Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. & …… (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) Tanish Projects Pvt. Ltd. 61/62, Gaya Buildings, 4Th Floor, 109, Y.M. Road, Masjid (West), Mumbai-400 003 Vs. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …… (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) Central Circle-2(2), Mumbai स्थायी लेखा िं./Pan No. Aacct8448C Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 1921 & 1928/Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …… (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) Central Circle-2(2), Pratishtha Bhavan, 8 Th Floor, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 020 Vs. Tanish Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. & …… (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) Tanish Projects Pvt. Ltd. 61/62, Gaya Buildings, 4Th Floor, 109, Y.M. Road, Masjid (West), Mumbai-400 003 अपीलाथी की ओर े / Appellant By : Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, Ar प्रत्यथी की ओर े / Respondent By : Shri R Manjunatha Swamy, Cit-Dr ुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 08-08-2018 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 24-08-2018

For Appellant: Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, ARFor Respondent: Shri
Section 131Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

returns which were the subject-matter of regular assessment. The same ought to have been assessed in the regular assessment and not in the block assessment." 10.8 The Hon'ble Mumbai ITAT in the case of Deepak Agarwal vs. ACIT (2014) 40 CCH 0311 Mum. Trib. decided that "the assessment ... decided that "Bank account having been disclosed to the Department, addition on account of entries appearing in this account cannot be made in the block assessment'. In view of the above stated judicial decisions, it is held that the regular books of accounts found and seized during search cannot

DCIT CC 2(2), Mumbai vs. Tanish Projects P.Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of Revenue are dismissed and the appeals of assessee are dismissed as infructuous

ITA 1928/MUM/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Aug 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri G Manjunatha, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita Nos. 2117 & 2118 /Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) Tanish Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. & …… (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) Tanish Projects Pvt. Ltd. 61/62, Gaya Buildings, 4Th Floor, 109, Y.M. Road, Masjid (West), Mumbai-400 003 Vs. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …… (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) Central Circle-2(2), Mumbai स्थायी लेखा िं./Pan No. Aacct8448C Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 1921 & 1928/Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …… (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) Central Circle-2(2), Pratishtha Bhavan, 8 Th Floor, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 020 Vs. Tanish Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. & …… (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) Tanish Projects Pvt. Ltd. 61/62, Gaya Buildings, 4Th Floor, 109, Y.M. Road, Masjid (West), Mumbai-400 003 अपीलाथी की ओर े / Appellant By : Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, Ar प्रत्यथी की ओर े / Respondent By : Shri R Manjunatha Swamy, Cit-Dr ुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 08-08-2018 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 24-08-2018

For Appellant: Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, ARFor Respondent: Shri
Section 131Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

returns which were the subject-matter of regular assessment. The same ought to have been assessed in the regular assessment and not in the block assessment." 10.8 The Hon'ble Mumbai ITAT in the case of Deepak Agarwal vs. ACIT (2014) 40 CCH 0311 Mum. Trib. decided that "the assessment ... decided that "Bank account having been disclosed to the Department, addition on account of entries appearing in this account cannot be made in the block assessment'. In view of the above stated judicial decisions, it is held that the regular books of accounts found and seized during search cannot

DCIT CC 2(2), Mumbai vs. Tanish Estate Developers P. Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeals of Revenue are dismissed and the appeals of assessee are dismissed as infructuous

ITA 1921/MUM/2017[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai24 Aug 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Sri Mahavir Singh, Jm & Sri G Manjunatha, Am Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita Nos. 2117 & 2118 /Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) Tanish Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. & …… (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) Tanish Projects Pvt. Ltd. 61/62, Gaya Buildings, 4Th Floor, 109, Y.M. Road, Masjid (West), Mumbai-400 003 Vs. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …… (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) Central Circle-2(2), Mumbai स्थायी लेखा िं./Pan No. Aacct8448C Aayakr Apila Sam./ Ita No. 1921 & 1928/Mum/2017 (Inaqa-Arna Baya- / Assessment Year 2011-12) The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, …… (Apilaaqai- / Appellant) Central Circle-2(2), Pratishtha Bhavan, 8 Th Floor, M.K. Road, Mumbai-400 020 Vs. Tanish Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. & …… (P`%Yaqaai- / Respondent) Tanish Projects Pvt. Ltd. 61/62, Gaya Buildings, 4Th Floor, 109, Y.M. Road, Masjid (West), Mumbai-400 003 अपीलाथी की ओर े / Appellant By : Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, Ar प्रत्यथी की ओर े / Respondent By : Shri R Manjunatha Swamy, Cit-Dr ुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing: 08-08-2018 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 24-08-2018

For Appellant: Shri Prakash Jhunjhunwala, ARFor Respondent: Shri
Section 131Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 68

returns which were the subject-matter of regular assessment. The same ought to have been assessed in the regular assessment and not in the block assessment." 10.8 The Hon'ble Mumbai ITAT in the case of Deepak Agarwal vs. ACIT (2014) 40 CCH 0311 Mum. Trib. decided that "the assessment ... decided that "Bank account having been disclosed to the Department, addition on account of entries appearing in this account cannot be made in the block assessment'. In view of the above stated judicial decisions, it is held that the regular books of accounts found and seized during search cannot