← All Phrases

“Section 10(54)”

Section References (mined)Section 10Section 10(54)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 10(54) is CIT v. Shyam R. Pawar (54 Taxmann.com 108), cited in 279 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 10(54)

CIT v. Shyam R. Pawar
54 Taxmann.com 108 · 2015 · High Court
279
citing judgments

Transactions involving the purchase and sale of shares cannot be considered bogus where the assessee provides documentary evidence, unless the revenue brings substantial evidence on record to reject such proof. This principle is consistently applied in cases concerning claims of bogus long-term capital gains arising from penny stock transactions.

CIT v. Rajesh Kumar Jalan
286 ITR 274 · 2006 · High Court
66
citing judgments

Section 139(4) of the Income-tax Act, which allows for filing a belated return, acts as a proviso to Section 139(1). Consequently, the time limit for depositing amounts or utilizing funds to claim exemptions, such as under Section 54, extends up to the due date for filing a return under Section 139(4).

CIT v. Ms. Jagriti Aggarwal
339 ITR 610 · 2011 · High Court
66
citing judgments

A return of income filed within the period allowed under Section 139(4) is valid for claiming exemptions and deductions, including those under Sections 54, 54F, and 80AC. However, depositing the unutilized capital gains in the Capital Gains Account Scheme is a statutory and mandatory requirement for claiming exemption under Section 54F.

Multi Screen Media P. Ltd. v. Union of India and Another
324 ITR 54 · 2010 · High Court
39
citing judgments

An assessment for an earlier year can be reopened based on a finding of fact made from fresh material discovered during the assessment for a subsequent year. This is permissible even if the earlier assessment involved a full and true disclosure.

Judgments citing Section 10(54)