← All Phrases

“Section 97(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 97Section 97(1)1 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 97(1) is CIT v. Corrtech Energy (P.) Ltd. (223 Taxmann 130), cited in 579 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 97(1)

CIT v. Corrtech Energy (P.) Ltd.
223 Taxmann 130 · 2014 · High Court
579
citing judgments

Disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D is not warranted if the assessee has not earned any exempt income in the relevant assessment year.

CIT v. Bankipur Club Ltd.
226 ITR 97 · 1997 · Supreme Court
125
citing judgments

The doctrine of mutuality applies only when there is complete identity between the contributors to a common fund and the participants in its surplus. Income received from non-members or distinct classes of members who do not share this identity is not covered by mutuality and is taxable.

Kailash Moudgil v. DCIT
72 ITD 97 · 2000 · ITAT
79
citing judgments

A mere irregularity in granting approval under Section 158BG of the Income-tax Act does not render the resulting assessment order invalid or fatal.

ITO v. Nawab Mir Barkat Ali Khan Bahadur
97 ITR 239 · 1974 · Supreme Court
43
citing judgments

Reassessment proceedings under Section 147 cannot be initiated based on a mere change of opinion or having second thoughts on the same material that was available during the original assessment. The Assessing Officer's omission to draw a correct legal presumption or inference from disclosed facts, without any failure to disclose fully and truly all material facts, does not warrant reopening.

ONGC Videsh Ltd. v. DCIT
37 SOT 97 · 2010 · ITAT
23
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred on the purchase and evaluation of seismic data of foreign blocks for the purpose of exploration and production of hydrocarbons is allowable as business expenditure under section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Additional CIT v. Tulip Star Hotels Limited
21 Taxmann.com 97 · 2012 · Supreme Court
17
citing judgments

Interest paid on borrowed funds used to acquire equity in a subsidiary is deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) if the holding company has a deep interest in the subsidiary's business and the investment is for commercial expediency. The Supreme Court noted that the S.A. Builders Ltd. case may need reconsideration in this context.

Subramania Iyer v. Union of India
97 ITR 228 · 1974 · High Court
16
citing judgments

A penalty notice is not automatically invalid for failure to strike off inappropriate grounds if no prejudice is caused to the assessee. Prejudice must be demonstrated.

ABN AMRO Bank NV v. ADIT
97 ITD 89 · 2005 · ITAT
15
citing judgments

Interest paid by an Indian branch of a bank to its overseas head office is not allowable as a deduction. This is because the payment is not considered chargeable to tax in India, and therefore, Section 195 TDS provisions are not attracted.

Judgments citing Section 97(1)