← All Phrases

“Section 143(1)”

Section References (mined)Section 143Section 143(1)13,466 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 143(1) is Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji (167 ITR 471), cited in 3,926 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 143(1)

Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji
167 ITR 471 · 1987 · Supreme Court
3,926
citing judgments

Delay in filing appeals, when supported by sufficient or justifiable cause, should be condoned with a liberal approach to ensure substantial justice. This principle prioritizes the cause of justice over mere technicalities.

CIT v. Kabul Chawla
380 ITR 573 · 2016 · High Court
3,235
citing judgments

In a search assessment under Section 153A, additions can only be made for completed or non-abated assessment years if incriminating material relevant to those years is found during the search, although notice under Section 153A(1) is mandatorily issued for six assessment years preceding the search.

Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT
243 ITR 83 · 2000 · Supreme Court
2,943
citing judgments

For revision under Section 263, the Assessing Officer's order must be both erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the revenue; if either condition is not met, the revisionary jurisdiction cannot be invoked. An order is not erroneous merely because the Assessing Officer did not record the details of enquiries conducted, provided due enquiries were made.

CIT v. Manjunatha Cotton & Ginning Factory
359 ITR 565 · 2013 · High Court
2,590
citing judgments

A penalty notice issued under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c) is invalid if it fails to specify whether the penalty proceedings are initiated for concealment of income or for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. This non-specification vitiates the penalty proceedings.

CIT v. Multiplan India Ltd.
38 ITD 320 · 1991 · ITAT
2,267
citing judgments

An appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal can be dismissed for non-prosecution or treated as unadmitted when the appellant fails to appear, cooperate, or show diligence, in accordance with Rule 19(2) of the Income-tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules. The law aids the vigilant, not those who sleep on their rights.

CIT v. Reliance Petroproducts Pvt. Ltd.
322 ITR 158 · 2010 · Supreme Court
2,228
citing judgments

Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars or concealment of income is not automatically leviable if the assessee has made a full disclosure of all particulars and the addition or disallowance arises from a difference of opinion.

CIT v. Reliance Utilities & Power Ltd.
313 ITR 340 · 2009 · High Court
2,118
citing judgments

Where an assessee claims that investments were made out of own funds, interest disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D may not apply if the assessee demonstrates the availability of sufficient interest-free funds to cover such investments.

Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar v. CWT
223 ITR 480 · 1997 · High Court
2,040
citing judgments

A court or tribunal is not bound to answer a reference or adjudicate an appeal on its merits if the party at whose instance the proceeding is made fails to appear at the hearing or take necessary steps for its proper conduct.

Judgments citing Section 143(1)

Vijaya Credit Co Operative Society Limited, Dakshina Kannada vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Puttur

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2496/BANG/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Shri Soundararajan K.Assessment Year : 2020-21 Vijaya Credit Co-Operative Society Limited, The Income Tax Officer, Bantara Bhawana Building, Vs. Ward 1, Guruvayanakere, Belthangady Taluk, Puttur. Dakshina Kannada. 574 217. Pan: Aaajv 0583D Appellant Respondent Appellant By : Shri Tharun Kothari, Ca Respondent By : Shri Swaroop Mannava, Addl.Cit(Dr)(Itat), Bengaluru. Date Of Hearing : 05.08.2025 Date Of Pronouncement : 20.08.2025 O R D E R Per Soundararajan Kthis Appeal Of The Assessee Is Filed Challenging The Order Of The Ld. Cit(Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (Nfac) Dated 23.10.2024 In Respect Of Assessment Year 2020-21. 2. The Brief Facts Are That The Assessee Is A Co-Operative Society Registered Under The Provisions Of Karnataka Co-Operative Societies Act. The Assessee Filed Return Of Income On 15.01.2021 Declaring An Income Of Rs.25,80,940. Thereafter Return Was Processed U/S. 143(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [The Act] By The Cpc. The Return Was Page 2 Of 3

For Appellant: Shri Tharun Kothari, CAFor Respondent: Shri Swaroop Mannava, Addl.CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru
Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)(a)

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SOUNDARARAJAN K