← All Phrases

“Section 24(1)(b)”

Section References (mined)Section 24Section 24(1)(b)4 judgments

The decision most relied on for Section 24(1)(b) is Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Udaipur DugdhUtpadakSahakari Sangh Ltd. (366 ITR 163), cited in 326 judgments on BharatTax.

Leading authorities on Section 24(1)(b)

Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Udaipur DugdhUtpadakSahakari Sangh Ltd.
366 ITR 163 · 2014 · High Court
326
citing judgments

Deduction for employee contributions to provident fund and other funds is disallowed if not paid by the due date of filing the return of income, particularly when Section 2(24)(x) and Section 36(1)(va) are considered. The omission of the second proviso to Section 43B(b) does not negate this disallowance.

CIT v. Malayalam Plantations Ltd.
53 ITR 140 · 1964 · Supreme Court
201
citing judgments

The expression "for the purpose of business" is wider in scope than "for the purpose of earning profits" and encompasses expenditures made for commercial expediency, business preservation, administration, and modernization.

CIT v. Mithilesh Kumari
92 ITR 9 · 1973 · High Court
54
citing judgments

Interest on borrowed capital used to acquire an asset, paid year after year until the date of sale, must be capitalized and included in the cost of acquisition for computing capital gains.

Phaltan Sugar Works Ltd. v. CIT
215 ITR 582 · 1995 · High Court
49
citing judgments

Interest on borrowed capital used for purposes not directly related to the assessee's immediate business, such as providing interest-free advances or investing in a subsidiary's shares, is not deductible under Section 36(1)(iii) due to a restrictive interpretation of "for the purposes of business."

L.RS. AND ORS. (2016)10 SCC 315 and PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BANGALORE & ORS. v. SOFTBRANDS INDIA P. LTD.
406 ITR 513 · 2018 · High Court
48
citing judgments

For comparability analysis in transfer pricing, giant companies with significantly higher turnover and brand value cannot be compared with small-sized companies, and such companies should be excluded from the comparable set.

CIT v. Cocanada Radhaswami Bank Ltd.
57 ITR 306 · 1965 · Supreme Court
46
citing judgments

The nature of the activity giving rise to income is fundamental in determining the deductibility of expenses. Interest on loans for acquiring properties held as current assets is a deductible business expenditure if incurred for business purposes.

CIT v. Mythreyi Pai
152 ITR 247 · 1985 · High Court
44
citing judgments

Expenditure incurred towards the purchase of shares is a capital expenditure and therefore, interest expenditure incurred on such purchases is not eligible for deduction under Section 36(1)(iii) of the Income Tax Act.

ITA Nos.162, 164, 165, 167 & 168 of 2002 Page 24 of 51 in CIT v. SS Ahluwalia
138 ITR 391 · 1982 · High Court
34
citing judgments

An appellate tribunal ought to remand a matter rather than set aside assessments entirely when jurisdiction is in question.

Judgments citing Section 24(1)(b)